Abstrakt
The fact that the greenhouse has got fertigation equipment allows for taking apply of various organic materials as substrate. Organic substrata applied in greenhouse cultivations, as compared with rockwool, are biodegradable and as a post-cultivation waste not destroy the natural environment. This research was conducted in glasshouse in the years 2008–2009. The tomato of Admiro F1 cultivar in the period from February to October for 22 clusters at the density of 2.4 plants for 1 m2. The treatment consisted of four substrata: 1) rape straw, 2) rape straw + high peat (3 : 1 v : v), 3) rape straw + pine bark (3 : 1 v : v), 4) rockwool (100 × 20 × 7.5 cm = 15 dm3). Straw was cut into pieces (2–3 cm) and placed in boxes 14 cm high, width: 8 cm and capacity 15 dm3. During the growing period after 33 weeks about 60% straw has been decomposed. Drop fertigation was applied in a closed system, without nutrient solution recirculation. In the period cultivar of tomato only in the first weeks in organic substrata a decrease in mineral nitrogen content was reported (albumization), but in cannot affect the plant growth because every
day nutrient solution was supplied to plants 9–11 times. The content of N-NH4 , N-NO3, K, Ca, Mg and EC in organic substrates did not significantly differ, compared to rockwool, in both study years. This experiment suggests that the nutrient solution for tomato cultivar in organic substrates was may be similar like that in rockwool.
Bibliografia
Bassan A., Sambo P., Zanin G., Evans M.R., 2012. Use of fresh rice hulls and anaerobic digestion residues as substrates alternative to peat. Acta Hort. 927, 1003–1010.
Benko B., Borošić J., Poljak M., Osvald J., 2012. Incidence of tomato blossom-end rot at different calcium levels. Acta Hort. 927, 385–392.
Buck J.S., Kubota C., Jensen M., 2008. Effect of mid-day reduction of high electrical conductivity treatment on the yield and quality of greenhouse cherry tomato. Hort. Technol. 18(3), 460–466.
Caretto S., Parente A., Serio F., Santamaria P., 2008. Influence of potassium and genotype on vitamin E content and reducing sugar of tomato fruits. Hort. Sci. 43(7), 2048–2051.
Choi J., Ahn J., Ku J., 2007. Growth and nutrient uptake of tomato plug seedling influenced by elevated blendingrate of perlite in coir and peatmoss substrates. Hort. Envir. Biotech. 48(5), 270–276.
Domeno I., Irigoyen N., Muro J., 2009. Evolution of organic matter and drainages in wood fibre and coconut fibre substrates. Sci. Hort. 122(2), 269–274.
Dorais M., Pepin S., 2011. Soil oxygenation effects on growth, yield and nutrition of organic greenhouse tomato crops. Acta Hort. 915, 91–99
Dyśko J., Kowalczyk W., Kaniszewski S., 2009. The influence of pH of nutrient solution on field and nutritional status of tomato plants grown in soilless culture system. Veget. Crops Res. Bull. 70, 59–69.
Garcia A.L., Madrid R., Gimeno V., Rodriguez Ortega W.M., Nicolas N., Garcia-Sanchez F., 2010. Influence of amino acids in the nutrient solution on the growth and mineral content of tomato plants. Agric. Verg.: Frut. Hort. Flor. Citr. Vid, Arroz 29(337), 157–164.
Gent P.P.N., 2004. Effect of nitrogen and potassium supply on yield and tissue composition of greenhouse tomato. Acta Hort. 644, 369–375.
Gruda N., 2012. Sustainable peat alternative growing media. Acta Hort. 927, 973–979.
Huang J.S., Snapp S.S., 2009. Potassium and boron nutrition enhance fruit quality in midwest fresh market tomatoes. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 40(11/12), 1937–1952.
Kang Y.J., Park J.M., Kim S.H., Kang N.J., Park K.S., 2011. Effects of root zone pH and nutrient concentration on the growth and nutrient uptake of tomato seedlings. J. Plant Nutr. 34(5), 640–652.
Kaniszewski S., Dyśko J., Kowalczyk W., Wojtysiak J., Wrocławski Z., Moraczewski A. 2012. Assessment of the changes in the physical properties of fibrous organic substrates in soilless culture of tomato. Acta Hort. 927, 815–820.
Khoshla S., Papadopoulos A.P., 2001. Influence of K:N ratio and EC on tomato plant raising. Acta Hort. 548,149–156.
Komosa A., Piróg J., Kleiber T., 2009. Changes of macro- and micronutrient contents in the root environment of greenhouse tomato grown in fiber wood. Veget. Crop Res. Bull. 70, 71–80.
Komosa A., Kleiber T., Piróg J., 2010. Contents of macro- and microelements in root environment of greenhouse tomato grown in rockwool and wood fiber depending on nitrogen levels in nutrient solutions. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortoroum Cultus 9(3), 59–68.
Miccolis V., Candido V., Lucarelli G., Castronuovo D., 2007. Cherry tomato yield on two different solid growing media. Acta Hort. 761, 573–579.
Nurzyński J., Michałojć Z., Jarosz Z., 2001. Mineral nutrient concentration in potting media (rockwool, peat, sand) and growth of tomato. Veget. Crops Res. Bull. 55,45–48.
Nurzyński J., 2005. Effect of different fertilization levels on yielding of greenhouse tomato grown on sand, peat or rockwool growth media. Veget. Crops Res. Bull. 63, 101–107
Nurzyński J., 2006. The yielding of greenhouse tomato grown in straw and rockwool. Folia Hort. 18/2, 17–23.
Olfati J.A., Peyvast G., Qamgosar R., Sheikhtaher Z., Salimi M., 2010. Synthetic humic acid increased nutrient uptake in cucumber soilless culture. Acta Hort. 871,425–428.
Perez M.L.S., Paris J.J.C., Yasuda R.S., Lao M.T., 2009. Influence of salinity and fertilization level on the nutrient distribution in tomato plants. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 40, 498–513.
Ramirez S.L.F., Diaz S.F.R., Muro E.J., 2012, Relation between soilless tomato quality and potassium concentration in nutritive solution Acta Hort. 947, 215–221.
Segura M.L., Contveras J.I., Salinas R., Lao M.T., 2009. Influence of salinity and fertilization level on greenhouse tomato yield and quality. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 40, 485–497.
Sonneveld C., Voogt W., 2001. Chemical analysis in substrate systems and hydroponics–use and interpretation. Acta Hort. 548, 247–259.
Tuzel J.H., Tuzel Y., Sul A., Eltez R.Z., 2001. Effects of EC level on the nutrient solution on yield and fruit quality of tomato. Acta Hort. 559, 587–592.
Verhagen J.B.G.M., 2009. Stability of growing media from a physical, chemical and biological perspective. Acta Hort. 819, 135–142.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
