Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
ASPHC Baner

Tom 18 Nr 4 (2019)

Artykuły

Pomological and phytochemical evaluation of different cherry species: mahaleb (Prunus mahaleb L.), wild sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) and wild sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.), sweet and sour cherry cultivars

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2019.4.17
Przesłane: 23 lipca 2019
Opublikowane: 2019-07-23

Abstrakt

Cherries are known as health friendly fruits due to their abundant phytochemical compositions. This study was conducted to determine phytochemical and pomological fruit properties of different cherry species including mahaleb (Prunus mahaleb L.), wild sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.), wild sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.), two sweet cherries (‘Napoleon’ and ‘Starks Gold’) and one sour cherry (‘Kütahya’) cultivars. For this aim, together with various pomological traits, total phenolics and anthocyanin contents, antioxidant capacity, organic acids, sugars, were analyzed in fruits of relevant genotypes. Results of all examined traits significantly varied between genotypes. Mahaleb showed the highest TSS (30.17%), fructose (8.71 μg/g) and glucose (20.74 μg/g) contents. Wild sour cherry gave the highest antioxidant capacity (13.25 mmol TE/kg total weight), anthocyanin (351.0 mg Pg-3-glk/kg total weight), citric acid (0.56 μg/g) and malic acid (2.96 μg/g) contents. As a rootstock, mahaleb was found to be superior in some of the traits when compared to wild sweet cherry. Significant correlations were observed between various traits. Additionally, principal component analysis (PCA) revealed different relationships among the traits and evaluated genotypes.

Bibliografia

  1. Bartolome, A.P., Ruperez, P., Fuster, C. (1995). Pineapple fruit: Morphological characteristics, chemical composition and sensory analysis of Red Spanish and Smooth Cayenne cultivars. Food Chem., 53, 75–79.
  2. Baytop, T. (1984). Therapy with medicinal plants in Turkey (past and present). Nobel Press, Istanbul, p. 353.
  3. Blando, F., Albano, C., Liu, Y., Nicoletti, I., Corradini, D., Tommasi, N., Gerardi, C., Mita, G., Kitts, D.D. (2016). Polyphenolic composition and antioxidant activity of the under‐utilised Prunus mahaleb L. fruit. J. Sci. Food Agric., 96(8), 2641–2649.
  4. Bolat, İ., Pırlak, L. (1998). Erzurum koşullarinda yetiştirilen Kütahya vişne çeşidinde bazi biyolojik özelliklerin ve meyve gelişiminin incelenmesi. Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 29(1), 1–11.
  5. Buman, G. (1977). Clonal selection in Prunus mahaleb rootstocks. Acta Hortic., 75, 139.
  6. Ercisli, S. (2004). A short review of the fruit germplasm resources of Turkey. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol., 51(4), 419–435.
  7. FAO. (2018). Food and Agriculture Organization, Crop Statistics, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC [date of acces: 21.07.2018].
  8. Girard, B., Kopp, T.G. (1998). Physicochemical characteristics of selected sweet cherry cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem., 46(2), 471–476.
  9. Giusti, M.M., Wrolstad, R.E. (2005). Characterization and measurement of anthocyanins by UV-visible spectroscopy, Unit F1.2. In: Handbook of Food Analytical Chemistry, Wrolstad, R.E., Schwartz, S.J. (eds.). Wiley, New York, 19–31.
  10. Güneyli, A., Onursal, C.E. (2014). Ilıman İklim Meyvelerinde Hasat Kriterleri. Gıda, Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı, Meyvecilik Araştırma Enstitüsü, http://arastirma.tarim.gov.tr/marem/Belgeler/Yeti%C5%9Ftiricilik%20Bilgileri/Il%C4%B1man%20%C4%B0klim%20Meyvelerinde%20Hasat%20Kriterleri.pdf [date of acces: 31.01.2019].
  11. Halilova, H., Ercisli, S. (2010). Several physico-chemical characteristics of cherry laurel (Laurocerasos officinalis Roem.) Fruits. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip., 24(3), 1970–1973.
  12. Haffner, K., Vestreheim, S. (1997). Fruit quality of strawberry cultivars. Acta Hortic., 439(1), 325–332.
  13. Hayaloglu, A.A., Demir, N. (2015). Physicochemical characteristics, antioxidant activity, organic acid and sugar contents of 12 sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars grown in Turkey. J. Food Sci., 80(3), 564–570.
  14. Jerković, I., Marijanović, Z., Staver, M.M. (2011). Screening of natural organic volatiles from Prunus mahaleb L. honey: coumarin and vomifoliol as nonspecific biomarkers. Molecules, 16(3), 2507–2518.
  15. Karlidag, H., Ercisli, S., Sengul, M., Tosun, M. (2009). Physico-chemical diversity in fruits of wild-growing sweet cherries (Prunus avium L.). Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 23(3), 1325–1329.
  16. Liu, R.H. (2003). Health benefits of fruit and vegetables are from additive and synergistic combinations of phytochemicals. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 78(Suppl.), 17–20.
  17. McGuire, R.G. (1992). Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience, 27(12), 1254–1255.
  18. Mitra, S.K., Bose, T.K., Rathore, D.S. (2003). Temperate fruits. Horticulture and Allied Publishers, Calcutta, India, p. 309.
  19. Mratinić, E., Fotirić-Akšić, M., Jovković, R. (2012). Analysis of wild sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) germplasm diversity in South-East Serbia. Genetika, 44(2), 259–268.
  20. Niklas, K.J. (1997). The evolutionary biology of plants. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  21. Nizamlıoğlu, N.M., Nas, S. (2010). Meyve ve sebzelerde bulunan fenolik bileşikler; yapıları ve önemleri. Gıda Tekn. Elek. Derg., 5(1), 20–35.
  22. Özbey, A., Öncül, N., Yildirim, Z., Yildirim, M. (2011). Mahlep ve mahlep ürünleri. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg. 28(2), 153–158.
  23. Özgen, M., Reese, R.N., Tulio, A.Z., Miller, A.R., Scheerens. J.C. (2006). Modified 2,2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) method to measure antioxidant capacity of selected small fruits and comparison to ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and 2,2’-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) methods. J. Agric. Food Chem., 54, 1151–1157.
  24. Rice-Evans, C.A., Miller, N.J., Paganga, G. (1996). Structure-antioxidant activity relationship of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free Radic. Biol. Med., 20, 933–956.
  25. Shui, G., Leong, L.P. (2002). Seperation and determination of organic acids and phenolic compounds in fruit juices and drinks by high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr., 977, 89–96.
  26. Singleton, V.L., Rossi, J.L. (1965). Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. J. Enol. Vitic., 16, 144–158.
  27. Taghizadeh, S.F., Asgharzadeh, A., Asili, J., Sahebkar, A., Shakeri, A. (2015). Evaluation of total phenolic content and antioxidant activity in ten selected mahaleb (Prunus mahaleb L.) genotypes. Int. J. Hortic. Sci. Technol., 2(2), 187–197.
  28. Wojdyło, A., Nowicka, P., Laskowski, P., Oszmiański, J. (2014). Evaluation of sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) fruits for their polyphenol content, antioxidant properties, and nutritional components. J. Agric. Food Chem. 62(51), 12332–12345.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Inne teksty tego samego autora

Podobne artykuły

<< < 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.