Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
Agronomy Science Baner text

Tom 76 Nr 4 (2021)

Artykuły

Kwantyfikacja usług ekosystemowych użytków zielonych na tle innych upraw paszowych (kukurydzy) w oparciu o zawartość azotu mineralnego w warstwie gleby 60–90 cm

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2021.4.5
Przesłane: 10 grudnia 2021
Opublikowane: 30-12-2021

Abstrakt

Grasslands provide many ecosystem services. Apart from being a source of fodder for animals, grasslands regulate water and soil quality by reducing nitrogen emissions to the environment. The aim of the study was to determine the biophysical and monetary value of ecosystem services of grassland based on the “mineral nitrogen content in the soil layer 60–90 cm” indicator depending on the method of use and the type of soil, against the cultivation of maize for green fodder. The study area encompassed three provinces, different in terms of soil use, livestock population and intensity of grassland use. The investigation indicated that the value of ecosystem services provided by grasslands varied spatially and depended on the type of use and type of soil. In mineral soils, the lowest levels of this index were recorded from sites used for pasturing, while the highest levels were found under maize crops. In organic soils (without maize crops), the smallest losses of Nmin were observed in meadows while the highest losses were in pastures. Nmin losses in organic soils were higher than in mineral soils. The losses observed were highest in Opolskie Province, followed by Podlaskie Province, with the lowest losses in Lubelskie Province.

Bibliografia

  1. Arregui L.M., Quemada M., 2006. Drainage and nitrate leaching in a crop rotation under different N-fertilizer strategies: application of capacitance probes. Plant Soil 288, 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9064-9
  2. Becla A., Czaja S., Zielinska A., 2013. Non-economic Arable Lands of Natural Environment Versus Ecosystems’ Services in the Eye of Modern Economic Calculation. Econ. Environ. 2(45), 12–17.
  3. Bojarczuk J., Księżak J., Kopiński J., Kozera P., 2015. The evaluation of production organiza-tion and effectiveness of fodder area utilization in farm specialized in dairy cattle breeding. Monografie i Rozprawy Naukowe IUNG Puławy 47, 63–89.
  4. Burzyńska I., 2014. Different meadow use and the ground water quality. Water Environ. Rural Areas 14(3), 10–15.
  5. Burzyńska I. Wesołowski P., 2015. Different utilization of meadow and nitrate nitrogen con-tent in soil and ground water. Adv. Agric. Sci. Probl. Iss. 581, 3–10.
  6. Costanza R., de Groot R., Sutton P., van der Ploeg S., Anderson S.J., Kubiszewski I., Farber S., Turner R.K., 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Change 26, 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
  7. de Groot R.S., Wilson M.A., Boumans R.M.J., 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem function, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 41, 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
  8. Fotyma M., Kęsik K., Pietruch C., 2010. Mineral nitrogen in soils of Poland as an indicator of plants nutrient requirements and soil water cleanness. Fertil. Fertil. 38, 5–83.
  9. Goliński T., Foltynowicz Z., 2018. Valuation of Ecosystem Services for Implementing Innova-tive Clean Technology. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 27(4), 1513–1521.
  10. Grzegorczyk S., 2016. The role of grassland ecosystems in environmental management. Adv. Agric. Sci. Probl. Iss. 586, 19–32.
  11. Hönigová I., Vačkář D., Lorencová E., Melichar J., Götzl M., Sonderegger G., Oušková V., Hošek M., Chobot K., 2018. Surey on grassland ecosystem services. Report of the Europe-an Topic Centre on Biological Diversity. Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Re-public, Prauge, 16–50.
  12. Ingraham M.W., Foster S.G., 2008. The value of ecosystem services provided by the U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System in the contiguous U.S. Ecol Econ. 67, 608–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.012
  13. Jankowska-Huflejt H., Barszczewski J., Moraczewski R., 2019. Grasslands management in Poland and Podlaskie Voivodship conditions and state. Wiad. Melior. Łąk. 2, 73–77.
  14. Kallis G., Gómez-Baggethun E., Zografos C., 2013. To value or not to value? That is not the question. Ecol. Econ. 94, 97–105.
  15. Kronenberg J., 2016. Ecosystem services – a new look at the value of the natural environment. In: EkoMiasto#Środowisko. Zrównoważony, inteligentny i partycypacyjny rozwój miast, 1st ed., Rzeńca A. (ed.). Wyd. UŁ, Łódź, 63–83.
  16. La Notte A., Maes J., Dalmazzone S., Neville D., Crossman N.D., Grizzetti B., Bidoglio G., 2017. Physical and monetary ecosystem service accounts for Europe: A case study for in-stream nitrogen retention. Ecosyst. Serv. 23, 18–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.002
  17. Norgaard R.B., 2013. Escaping Economism, Escaping the Econocene. In: Economy of Sufficiency, 1st ed., U. Schneidewind, T. Santarius, A. Humburg (ed.). Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Wuppertal, Germany, 34–36.
  18. Pascual U., Muradian R., Brander L., Gómez-Baggethun E., Martín-López B., Verma M., 2010. The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity. In: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations, 1st ed., P. Kumar (ed.), Earthscan, London, UK, 45–76.
  19. Pawluczuk J., Szymczuk S., 2008. Dynamics of organic nitrogen mineralisation in muck soils of Dymerskie Meadows and the content of nitrate and ammonium nitrogen in groundwaters. Water Environ. Rural Areas 8(2b), 105–115.
  20. Pietrzak S., Urbaniak M., Sapek B., 2006. The assessment of changes of the concentration and leaching of mineral forms of nitrogen in soil solutions. Water Environ. Rural Areas, 6(17), 51–63.
  21. PN-R-04028:1997. Analiza chemiczno-rolnicza gleby. Metoda pobierania próbek i oznaczanie zawartości jonów azotanowych i amonowych w glebach mineralnych.
  22. Rūsiņa S., 2017. Semi-natural grasslands in Latvia. In: Outstanding semi-natural grassland sites in Latvia: biodiversity, management, restoration, 1st ed., S. Rūsiņa (ed.), University of Latvia, Riga, 16–34.
  23. Ruskule A., Indriksone D., Gulbinas J., Morkvėnas Ž., Kuris M., Remmelgas L., 2015. Analy-sis of the policies and regulatory framework influencing maintenance of grassland ecosys-tems in the Baltic States: Synthesis Report. In: LIFE Viva Grass, 1st ed., A. Ruskule (ed.), Baltic Environmental Forum, 11–23.
  24. Ryszkowski L., Karg J., Bernacki Z., 2003. Biocenotic function of the mid-field woodlots in West Poland: study area and research assumptions. Pol. J. Ecol. 51(3), 269–281.
  25. Sapek A., Sapek B., 2007. Changes of the mineral nitrogen content in meadow soil on the background of differentiated nitrogen fertilization. Soil Sci. Ann. 58(1), 99–108.
  26. Statistics Poland. Agriculture in 2020. Available online: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/rolnictwo-lesnictwo (accessed on 22 April 2021).
  27. Tian Q., Wang X., Wang D., Wang M., Liao C., Yang X., Liu F., 2017. Decoupled linkage between soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization among soil depths in a subtropical mixed forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 109, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.02.009
  28. Villoslada M., Vinogradovs I., Ruskule A., Veidemane K., Nikodemus O., Kasparinskis R., Sepp K., Gulbinas J., 2018. A multitiered approach for grassland ecosystem services map-ping and assessment: The Viva Grass tool. In: One Ecosystem, 1st ed., F. Santos (ed.), 3, e25380, 151–200. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e25380
  29. Vooren V., Reubens L., Broekx B., Reheul S., Verheyen D., 2018. Assessing the impact of grassland management extensification in temperate areas on multiple ecosystem services and biodiversity. Agric. Ecosyst. 267, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.08.016
  30. Watros A., Lipińska H., Lipiński W., Tkaczyk P., Krzyszczak J., Baranowski P., 2018a. Mineral nitrogen content in the 60-90 cm layer of grassland soils relative to other fodder crops, way of managing agricultural lands and farming intensity. Acta Agrophys. 25(3), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.31545/aagr/97185
  31. Watros A., Lipińska H., Lipiński W., Tkaczyk P., Krzyszczak J., 2019a. Mineral nitrogen con-tent in hydrographic areas of Poland depending on land use. Int. Agrophys. 33(4), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.31545/intagr/112023
  32. Watros A., Lipińska H., Lipiński W., Tkaczyk P., Krzyszczak J., Baranowski P., 2018b. The impact of fertilization on the mineral nitrogen content in grassland and fodder crop soils. Przem. Chem. 97(11), 1899–1905. https://doi.org/10.15199/62.2018.11.17
  33. Watros A., Tkaczyk P., Lipińska H., Lipiński W., Krzyszczak J., Baranowski P., Brodowska M., 2019b. Mineral nitrogen content in soils depending on land use and agronomic category. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 17(3), 5663–5675. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1703_56635675
  34. Wieliczko B., 2016. Applying ecosystem services in natural resource management in agriculture. Studia i Prace WNEiZ US, 46(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.18276/sip.2016.46/2-12
  35. Zisenis M., Richard D., Vačkář D., Lorencová E., Melichar J., Hönigová I., Oušková V., Hošek M., Chobot K., Götzl M., Sonderegger G., 2011. Survey on grassland ecosystem services in the Czech Republic and literature review. ETC/BD report to the EEA. Available online: https://www.eionet.europa.eu/etcs/etc-bd/products/etc-bd-re-ports/survey_on_grassland_ ecosystem _services_cz/@@download/file/Survey_on_grassland_ecosystem_services_CZ.pdf (accessed on 22 April 2020).
  36. Żylicz T., 2010. Valuation of ecosystem services. An overview of world research. Econ. Envi-ron. 1(37), 31–45.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Inne teksty tego samego autora

1 2 3 > >> 

Podobne artykuły

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.