Abstract
The aim of the research was to determine the reaction of two soybean cultivars to the different sowing date. The arrangement of weather conditions was variable in individual years and had a modifying effect on the assessed features and parameters. As a result, the seed yield ranged from 3.95 t‧ha–1 in 2017 to 4.81 t·ha–1 in 2018. Sowing seeds in the third decade of April resulted in a significant increase in the plant density before harvesting, but at the same time decreased the number of pods on the plant. The highest MTN was obtained after sowing the seeds at the latest date. Sowing seeds in the second decade of April allowed to obtain a higher seed yield by 0.37 t·ha–1 compared to sowing in the first decade of May. The May sowing date significantly increased the protein content in seeds in relation to the earliest sowing date. Protein and fat yields did not differ significantly in terms of variety and sowing date. The cultivar Alligator produced more pods on the plant, while the cultivar ‘Abelina’ produced seeds with a higher MTN. The cultivars studied did not differ significantly in seed yield, which amounted to 4.43 t·ha–1 on average.
References
- Bastidas A.M., Setiyono T.D., Dobermann A., Cassman K.G., Elmore R.W., Graef G.L., Specht J.E., 2008. Soybean sowing date: the vegetative, reproductive, and agronomic impacts. Crop Sci. 48(2), 727–740. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.05.0292
- Bateman N.R., Catchot A.L., Gore J., Cook D.R., Musser F.R., Irby J.T., 2020. Effects of planting date for soybean growth, development, and yield in the southern USA. Agronomy 10(596), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040596
- Calviño P.A., Sadras V.O., Andrade F.H., 2003a. Development, growth and yield of late-sown soybean in the southern Pampas. Eur. J. Agron. 19(2), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00050-3
- Calviño P.A., Sadras V.O., Andrade F.H., 2003b. Quantification of environmental and management effects on the yield of late-sown soybean. Field Crops Res. 83(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00062-5
- Divito G.A., Echeverría H., Andrade F.H., Sadras V.O., 2016. Soybean shows an attenuated nitrogen dilution curve irrespective of maturity group and sowing date. Field Crops Res. 186, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.11.004
- El Toum G.A., Khalifa N.M., Sid Ahmed A.M., Idris H.A., 2020. Effect of planting date and sowing method on yield and grain quality of soybean (Glycine max L.) under North Sudan conditions. Moroccan J. Agri. Sci. 1(2), 91–94.
- Faligowska A., Panasiewicz K., Szymańska G., Szukała J., Koziara W., Ratajczak K., 2019. Wpływ terminu siewu na plonowanie i wartość siewną nasion soi. Biuletyn IHAR, 285, 195–196.
- Ibrahim S.E., 2012. Agronomic studies on irrigated soybeans in central Sudan: II. Effect of sowing date on grain yield and yield components. Int. J. Agri Sci. 2(9), 766–773.
- Kessler A., Archontoulis S.V., Licht M.A., 2020. Soybean yield and crop stage response to planting date and cultivar maturity in Iowa, USA. Agron. J. 112(1), 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20053
- Khan A.Z., Shah P., Khalil S.K., Ahmed B., 2004. Yield of soybean cultivars as affected by planting date under Peshawar valley conditions. Nucleus 41, 93–95.
- Khan A.Z., Shah P., Khalil S.K., Taj F.H., 2003. Influence of planting date and plant density on morphological traits of determinate and indeterminate soybean cultivars under temperate environment. J. Agron. 2(3), 146–152. https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ja.2003.146.152
- Kotecki A., Lewandowska S. (red.) 2020. Studia na uprawą soi zwyczajnej (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) w południowo-zachodniej Polsce. Wyd. UP we Wrocławiu, 54–79.
- Kumagai E., Takahashi T., 2020. Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) yield reduction due to late sowing as a function of radiation interception and use in a cool region of northern Japan. Agronomy 10, 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010066
- Kumagai E., 2018. Effect of early sowing on growth and yield of determinate and indeterminate soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) cultivars in a cool region of northern Japan. J. Agric. Meteorol. 74(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.D-17-00009
- Kumar R., Singh K.K., Gupta B.R.D., Baxla A.K., Rathore L.S., Attri S.D., 2002. Optimum sowing dates for soybean in central India using CROPGRO and ClimProb symbiosis. Meteorol. Appl. 9(2), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482702002104
- Mourtzinis S., Specht J.E., Conley S.P., 2019. Defining optimal soybean sowing dates across the US. Sci. Rep. 9(2800), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38971-3
- Nico M., Miralles D.J., Kantolic A.G., 2019. Natural post-flowering photoperiod and photoperiod sensitivity: Roles in yield-determining processes in soybean. Field Crops Res. 231, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.10.019
- Pierozan Junior C., Kawakami J., Schwarz K., Umburanas R.C., Del Conte M.V., Müller M.M.L., 2017. Sowing dates and soybean cultivars influence seed yield, oil and protein contents in subtropical environment. J. Agric. Sci. 9(6), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v9n6p188
- Praczyk T. (red.), 2017. Instrukcja uprawy soi. Wyd. IOR-PIB w Poznaniu, 1–50.
- Rao M.S.S., Mullinix B.G., Rangappa M., Cebert E., Bhagsari A.S., Sapra V.T., Joshi J.M., Dadson R.B., 2002. Genotype x environment interactions and yield stability of food grade soybean genotypes. Agron. J. 94(1), 72–80.
- Rattalino Edreira J.I., Mourtzinis S., Conley S.P., Roth A.C., Ciampitti I.A., Licht M.A., Kandel H., Kyveryga P.M., Lindsey L.E., Mueller D.S., Naeve S.L., Nafziger E., Specht J.E., Stanley J., Staton M.J., Grassini P., 2017. Assessing causes of yield gaps in agricultural areas with diversity in climate and soils. Agric. For. Meteorol. 247, 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.07.010
- Robinson A.P., Conley S.P., Volenec J.J., Santini J.B., 2009. Analysis of high yielding, early‐planted soybean in Indiana. Agron. J. 101(1), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0014x
- Sadeghi S.M., Niyaki S.A.N., 2013. Effects of planting date and cultivar on the yield and yield components of soybean in north of Iran. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 8(1), 81–85.
- Setiyono T.D., Weiss A., Specht J.E., Bastidas A.M., Cassman K.G., Dobermann A., 2007. Understanding and modeling the effect of temperature and daylength on soybean phenology under high-yield conditions. Field Crops Res. 100(2–3), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.07.011
- Specht J.E., Hume D.J., Kumudini S.V., 1999. Soybean yield potential – A genetic and physiological perspective. Crop Sci. 39, 1560–1570. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961560x
- Tyagi S.D., Khan M.H., Teixeira Da Silva J.A., 2011. Yield stability of some soybean genotypes across diverse environments. Int. J. Plant Breed. 5(1), 37–41.
- Umburanas R.C., Yokoyama A.H., Balena L., Dourado-Neto D., Teixeira W.F., Zito R.K., Reichardt K., Kawakami. J., 2019. Soybean yield in different sowing dates and seeding rates in a subtropical environment. Int. J. Plant Prod. (13), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-019-00040-0
- Umburanas R.C., Yokoyama A.H., Balena L., Lenhani G.C., Teixeira Â.M., Krüger, R.L., Reichardt K., Kawakami J., 2018. Sowing dates and seeding rates affect soybean grain composition. Int.
- J. Plant Prod. 12(3), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-018-0018-y
- Uslu N., Esendal E., 1998. Response of inoculation and sowing date of soybean under Bafra plain conditions in the Northern region of Turkey. Trop. J. Agric. For. 22, 525–531.
- Woźniak E., Twardowski T., 2018. GMO – czy w Polsce możliwa jest hodowla zwierząt gospodarskich bez pasz GM? Nauka 3, 155–173.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
-
BARBARA SYMANOWICZ,
STANISŁAW KALEMBASA,
DAWID JAREMKO,
MATEUSZ NIEDBAŁA,
Polish brown coals waste – potential source of plants nutrients
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 68 No. 4 (2013)
-
MAREK ĆWINTAL,
MIECZYSŁAW WILCZEK,
Influence of agrotechnical factors on the structure and seed yield of white clover (Trifolium repens L.)
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 67 No. 2 (2012)
-
Ryszard Weber,
Borys Hryńczuk,
Influence of forecrop and mode of tillage on weed infestation of winter wheat
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 60 (2005)
-
Jerzy Księżak,
Jan Kuś,
Faba bean yielding in varying systems of plant production
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 60 (2005)
-
SYLWIA ANDRUSZCZAK,
PIOTR KRASKA,
EWA KWIECIŃSKA-POPPE,
NATALIA GIERASIMIUK,
PAWEŁ GIERASIMIUK,
EDWARD PAŁYS,
The influence of herbicides and foliar fertilization on the yielding and weed infestation of husked (Avena sativa L.) and naked (Avena nuda L.) oat
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 72 No. 4 (2017)
-
Magdalena Serafin-Andrzejewska,
Wiesław Wojciechowski,
Marie Pichová ,
Prof. dr hab. Marcin Kozak,
Profitability of growing field beans Vicia faba var. minor L. for seeds depending on the application of symbiotic bacteria
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 79 No. 4 (2024)
-
Cezary Trawczyński,
Effect of foliar fertilization with multicomponent fertilizers in form nanoparticle on the yield and quality of potato tubers
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 77 No. 2 (2022)
-
Cezary Trawczyński,
Assess of tuber yield and quality after foliar application of silicon and microelements
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 76 No. 1 (2021)
-
Krystyna Zarzecka,
Agnieszka Ginter,
Marek Gugała,
Iwona Mystkowska,
Economic aspects of edible potato cultivation depending on the method of plantation protection against weeds
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 78 No. 2 (2023)
-
Aleksandra Głowacka,
Ewelina Flis-Olszewska,
The biodiversity of weed communities of dent maize, narrow-leaved lupin and oat in relation to cropping system and weed control
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 77 No. 3 (2022)
<< < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.