Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Agronomy Science Baner text

Vol. 77 No. 4 (2022)

Articles

Effect of foliar fertilization on the yield and chemical composition of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) seeds

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2022.4.4
Submitted: August 29, 2022
Published: 2023-01-25

Abstract

Foliar fertilization is an effective treatment increasing the size and quality of crops. A strict field experiment was carried out in the 2019/2020–2020/2021 seasons at the experimental station of the Podkarpackie Agricultural Advisory Center in Boguchwała. The aim of the research was to determine the reaction of winter oilseed rape (cultivar DK Platinium F1) to varied spring foliar fertilization (nitrogen and boron). The one-factor experiment was set up in a random block design with four replications. It was shown that the yield and quality of winter rape seeds were variable in the years of the research. In 2021, the average yield was higher by 0.2 t·ha–1 compared to 2020. The highest protein and fat content in seeds was obtained in 2021. Double and triple foliar fertilization had a positive effect on the seed yield in relation to control. The obtained significant difference was 0.21 and 0.24 t·ha–1, respectively. Triple foliar fertilization increased the protein concentration in the seeds by 8 g·kg–1 compared to the control, with a stable fat content. Therefore, this variant can be recommended for agricultural practice.

References

  1. Amiri M., Shirani Rad A.H., Valadabadi A., Sayfzadeh S., Zakerin H., 2020. Response of rapeseed fatty acid composition to foliar application of humic acid under different plant densities. Plant Soil Environ. 66, 303–308. https://doi.org/10.17221/220/2020-PSE DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/220/2020-PSE
  2. Beres J., Becka D., Tomasek J., Vasak J., 2019. Effect of autumn nitrogen fertilization on winter oilseed rape growth and yield parameters. Plant Soil Environ. 65, 435–441. https://doi.org/10.17221/444/2019-PSE DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/444/2019-PSE
  3. Blecharczyk A., Paszkowski A., Dudzińska A., 2020. Plonowanie rzepaku ozimego uprawianego w II roku wpływu następczego roślin strączkowych w zależności od uprawy roli i nawożenia azotem. Fragm. Agron. 37(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.26374/fa.2020.37.6
  4. Chmura K., Dzieżyc H., Piotrowski M., 2016. Wpływ warunków meteorologicznych na zawartość tłuszczu i białka w nasionach rzepaku ozimego. Acta Agrophys. 23(2), 163–173.
  5. Fageria N.K., Barbosa Filho M.B., Moreira A., Guimarães C.M., 2009. Foliar fertilization of crop plants. J. Plant Nutr. 32, 1044–1066. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160902872826 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160902872826
  6. Ganya S., Svotwa E., Katsaruware R.D., 2018. Performance of two rape (Brassica napus) cultivars under different fertilizer management levels in the smallholder sector of Zimbabwe. Int. J. Agron. 2351204, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2351204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2351204
  7. Gonzalez C., Zheng Y., Lovatt C.J., 2010. Properly timed foliar fertilization can and should result in a yield benefit and net increase in grower income. Acta Hortic. 868, 273–286. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.868.36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.868.36
  8. Jankowski K.J., Hulanicki P.S., Krzebietke S., Żarczyńki P., Hulanicki P., Sokólski M., 2016a. Yield and quality of winter oilseed rape in response to different systems of foliar fertilization. J. Elem. 21, 1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2016.21.1.1108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2016.21.1.1108
  9. Jankowski K.J., Sokólski M., Dubis B., Krzebietke S., Żarczyński P., Hulanicki P., Hulanicki P.S., 2016b. Yield and quality of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) seeds in response to foliar application of boron. Agr. Food Sci. 25, 164–176. https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.57413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.57413
  10. Jankowski K.J., Sokólski M., Szatkowski A., 2019. The effect of autumn foliar fertilization on the yield and quality of winter oilseed rape seeds. Agronomy 9, 849. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120849
  11. Jarecki W., Kipa J., 2019. Produkcja rzepaku w UE, Polsce i województwie podkarpackim w aspekcie rozwoju odnawialnych źródeł energii. Pol. J. Sustain. Develop. 23(2), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.15584/pjsd.2019.23.2.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15584/pjsd.2019.23.2.1
  12. Jarecki W., Bobrecka-Jamro D., 2019a. Reakcja kiłotolerancyjnych odmian rzepaku ozimego na zróżnicowaną ilość wysiewu nasion. Agron. Sci. 74(4), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2019.4.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2019.4.5
  13. Jarecki W., Bobrecka-Jamro D., 2019b. Yields of oilseed rape in habitat conditions of Podkarpackie Provence. Acta Agrophys. 26(3), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.31545/aagr/113241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31545/aagr/113241
  14. Jarecki W., Buczek J., Bobrecka-Jamro D., 2019. The response of winter oilseed rape to diverse foliar fertilization. Plant Soil Environ. 65, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.17221/5/2019-PSE DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/5/2019-PSE
  15. Jo H., Asekova S., Bayat M.A., Ali L., Song J.T., Ha Y.-S., Hong D.-H., Lee J.-D., 2022. Comparison of yield and yield components of several crops grown under agro-photovoltaic system in Korea. Agriculture 12, 619. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050619 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050619
  16. Kaczmarek J., Kotecki A., Kotowicz L., Weber R., 2003. Interakcja genotypowo-środowiskowa plonowania odmian rzepaku ozimego w doświadczeniach PDO. Biuletyn IHAR 226/227(2), 395–403.
  17. Kalantar Ahmadi S.A., Ebadi A., Daneshian J., Siadat S.A., Jahanbakhsh S., 2017. Effect of drought stress and foliar application of growth regulators on photosynthetic pigments and seed yield of rapeseed (Brassica napus L. cv. Hyola 401). Iran. J. Crop Sci. 18, 196–217.
  18. Kocoń A., 2009. Efektywność dolistnego dokarmiania pszenicy i rzepaku ozimego wybranymi nawozami w warunkach optymalnego nawożenia i wilgotności gleby. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, E Agric. 64(2), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2009.2.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2009.2.4
  19. Kocoń A., 2014. Potrzeby pokarmowe roślin. Studia i Raporty IUNG–PIB Puławy 37(11), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.26114/sir.iung.2014.37.02
  20. Koohkan H., Manouchehr M., 2016. Effect of nitrogen – Boron interaction on plant growth and tissue nutrient concentration of canola (Brassica napus L.). J. Plant Nutr. 39, 922–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2016.1143492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2016.1143492
  21. Kwiatkowski C.A., 2012. Response of winter rape (Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera Metzg., Sinsk) to foliar fertilization and different seeding rates. Acta Agrobot. 65, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2012.070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2012.070
  22. Meier U. (ed.), 2001. Growth stages of mono-and dicotyledonous plants, 2nd ed. BBCH Monograph, Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Bonn.
  23. Podleśna A., 2014. Potrzeby pokarmowe i nawożenie rzepaku ozimego. Studia i Raporty IUNG–PIB Puławy 37(11), 111–125.
  24. Rios J.J., Garcia-Ibañez P., Carvajal M., 2019. The use of biovesicles to improve the efficiency of Zn foliar fertilization. Colloid. Surf. B Biointerfaces 173, 899–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.10.057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.10.057
  25. Sikorska A., Gugała M., Zarzecka K., 2020a. Winter oilseed rape yield depending on foliar fertilization. Acta Sci. Pol. Agricultura 19(1), 11–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37660/aspagr.2020.19.1.2
  26. Sikorska A., Gugała M., Zarzecka K., 2020b. The impact of foliar feeding on the yield components of three winter rape morphotypes (Brassica napus L.). Open Agric. 5, 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2020-0011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2020-0011
  27. Varga L., Ložek O., Ducsay L., Kováćik P., Lošák T., Hlušek J., 2010. Effect of topdressing with nitrogen and boron on the yield and quality of rapeseed. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendel. Brun. 58, 391–398. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201058050391 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201058050391
  28. Wenda-Piesik A., Hoppe S., 2018. Evaluation of hybrid and population cultivars on standard and high-input technology in winter oilseed rape. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 68, 678–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2018.1460864 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2018.1460864
  29. Wielebski F., 2009. Reakcja różnych typów hodowlanych odmian rzepaku ozimego na poziom stosowanej agrotechniki. II. Jakość zbieranego plonu. Rośliny Oleiste – Oilseed Crops 30(1), 91–101.
  30. Wielebski F., Wójtowicz M., 2019. Wpływ symulowanych przymrozków wiosennych na uszkodzenia kwitnących roślin rzepaku ozimego oraz straty w plonie nasion. Fragm. Agron. 36(2), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.26374/fa.2019.36.19
  31. Wójtowicz M., Jajor E., 2010. Wpływ wybranych czynników technologii produkcji na plony rzepaku ozimego. Prog. Plant Prot. 50(2), 565–569.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.