Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 15 No. 5 (2016)

Articles

RESPONSE OF GRAPEVINE (Vitis vinifera L.) LEAVES TO DIFFERENT LEAF FERTILIZERS UNDER A SEMI-ARID CONDITION

Submitted: October 29, 2020
Published: 2016-10-31

Abstract

Ever-increasing shortage in global agricultural water sources urged the re-searchers to investigate sustainable strategies for alleviating the negative effects of drought on plants in semi arid or arid regions. In this sense, foliar fertilization gained particular significance as it supports the plant to cope with water shortage. This study was conducted to investigate the leaf physiological response of the grapevine ‘Narince’ to various organic leaf fertilizers. Leaf protein content was also determined to compare treatment effects on nutritional value of grape leaves since the leaves of this cultivar are consumed in various ways. Both stomatal conductance, leaf chlorophyll and protein content increased in response to leaf fertilizers in varying degrees according to the products used. To illustrate, Herbagreen pulverization resulted in the highest stomatal conductance (gs) (324.7 mmol H2O m-2 s-1), and was followed by Cropset (323.5 mmol H2O m-2 s-1) while the lowest gs value was obtained from control vines (295.4 mmol H2O m-2 s-1). The highest chlorophyll and protein contents were obtained from ISR 2000 (32.9 mg kg-1) and Maxicrop (21.5%) treatments, respectively. Leaf chlorophyll content had a significant positive correlation with leaf protein content when all the observations were pooled. Therefore, the organic leaf fertilizers can be considered as a safe, sustainable and innovative strategies to support plants to cope with drought.

References

AOAC (2005). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 18th ed. AOAC International, Maryland, USA.
Botha, E.J., Zebarth, B.J., Leblon, B. (2006). Non-destructive estimation of potato leaf chlorophyll and protein contents from hyperspectral measurements using the PROSPECT radiative transfer model. Can. J. Plant Sci., 86, 279–291.
Celik, H., Agaoglu, Y.S., Fidan, Y., Marasali, B., Soylemezoglu, C. (1998). General Viniculture. Sun Fidan A.S. Professional Books Series No. 1, 253, Ankara, pp, 1–253.
Clement, C.R., Chavez, W.B., Gomes, J.B.M. (1988). Considerations on peach palm (Bactris gasipaes H.B.K.) as a heart-of-palm producer. Enc. Nacion. Pesquis. Palm., 1, 225–247 (in Portoghese).
Düring, H., Loveys, B.R. (1996). Stomatal patchiness of field-grown Sultana leaves: Diurnal changes and light effects. Vitis, 35, 7–10.
Gonzalez-Dugo, M., Moran, M., Mateos, L. (2005). Canopy temperature variability as an indicator of crop water stress severity. Irrig. Sci., DOI 10.1007/s00271-005-0023-7.
Greer, D.H. (2012). Modelling leaf photosynthetic and transpiration temperature-dependent responses in Vitis vinifera cv. Semillon grapevines growing in hot, irrigated vineyard conditions. AoB Plants, DOI:10.1093/aobpla/pls009.
Hirayama, M., Wada, Y., Nemoto, H. (2006). Estimation of drought tolerance based on leaf temperature in upland rice breeding. Breed. Sci., 56, 47–54.
Hussein, M.M., Mehanna, H.M., El-Lethy, S.M. (2013). Water deficit and foliar fertilization and their effect on growth and photosynthetic pigments of Jatropha plants. World Appl. Sci. J., 27, 454–461.
Johnson, D.M., Woodruff, D.R., Mcculloh, K.A., Meinzer, F.C. (2009). Leaf hydraulic conductance, measured in situ, declines and recovers daily: leaf hydraulics, water potential and stomatal conductance in four temperate and three tropical tree species. Tree Physiol., 29, 879–887.
Kapotis, G., Zervoudakis, G., Veltsistas, T., Salahas, G. (2003). Comparison of chlorophyll meter readings with leaf chlorophyll concentration in Amaranthus vlitus: Correlation with physiological processes. Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 50, 395.
Kara, Z., Sabir, A. (2010). Effects of HerbaGreen application on vegetative developments of some grapevine rootstocks during nursery propagation in glasshouse. In 2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8–9, Sarajevo, 127–132.
Larsen, F.E., Higgins, S.S., Wir, A.A. (1989). Diurnal water relations of apple, apricot, grape, olive and peach in an arid environment (Jordan). Sci. Hort., 39, 211–222.
Liu, F., Stutzel, H. (2002). Leaf expansion, stomatal conductance, and transpiration of vegetable Amaranth (Amaranthus sp.) in response to soil drying. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 127, 878–883.
Matsumoto, K., Ohta, T., Tanaka, T. (2005). Dependence of stomatal conductance on leaf chlorophyll concentration and meteorological variables. Agr. For. Meteorol., 132, 44–57.
Miranda, T., Ebner, M., Traiser, C., Roth-Nebelsick, A. (2013). Diurnal pattern of stomatal conductance in the large-leaved temperate liana Aristolochia macrophylla depends on spatial po-sition within the leaf lamina. Ann. Bot., 111, 905–915.
Mora-Urpí, J., Weber, J.C., Clement, C.R. (1997). Peach Palm (Bactris gasipaes Kunth): Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilized Crops. – Inst. Plant Genetics Crop Plant Resorces, Rome.
Murtezaoglu, C. (2006). Physicochemical and in vitro hypoglychemic characteristics of fiber rich fractions of brinedvine leaves. Istanbul Tech. Univ., Graduate School Sci. Engin. Technol., M. Sc. Thesis, 51 p.
Papasavvas, A., Triantafyllidis, V., Zervoudakis, G., Kapotis, G., Samaras, Y., Salahas, G., (2008). Correlation of SPAD-502 meter readings with physiological parameters and leaf ni-trate content in Beta vulgaris. J. Environ. Protec. Ecol., 9, 351–356.
Paranychianakis, N.V., Chartzoulakis, K.S., Angelakis, A.N. (2004). Influence of rootstock, irrigation level and recycled water on water relations and leaf gas exchange of Soultanina grapevines. Environ. Exp. Bot., 52, 185–198.
Rogiers, S.Y., Greer, D.H., Hatfield, J.M., Hutton, R.J., Clarke, H.S. (2011). Stomatal response of an anisohydric grapevine cultivar to evaporative demand, available soil moisture and abscisic acid. Tree Physiol., 32, 249–261.
Sabir, A. (2016). Physiological and morphological responses of grapevıne (V vinifera L. cv. ‘Italiaʼ) leaf to water deficit under different rootstock effects. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 15, 135–148.
Sabir, A., Yazar, K. (2015). Diurnal dynamics of stomatal conductance and leaf temperature of grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) in response to daily climatic variables. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 14, 3–15.
Sat, I.G., Sengul, M., Keles, F. (2002). Use of grape leaves in canned food. Pak. J. Nutr., 1, 257–262.
Stavrinides, M.C., Daane, K.M., Lampinen, B.D., Mills, N.J. (2010). Plant water stress, leaf temperature, and spider mite (Acari: Tatranychidae) outbreaks in California vineyards. Envi-ron. Entomol., 39, 1232–1241.
TSMS (2016). Turkish State Meteorological Service. http://www.mgm.gov.tr.
Zsófi, Z., Villangó, Sz., Pálfi, Z., Tóth, E., Bálo, B. (2014). Texture characteristics of the grape berry skin and seed (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Kékfrankos) under postveraison water deficit. Sci. Horticult., 172, 9, 176–182.
Zufferey, V., Cochard, H., Ameglio, T., Spring, J.L., Viret, O. (2011). Diurnal cycles of embolism formation and repair in petioles of grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. Chasselas). J. Exp. Bot., DOI:10.1093/jxb/err081.
Zweifel, R., Steppe, K., Sterck, F.J. (2007). Stomatal regulation by microclimate and tree water relations: interpreting ecophysiological field data with a hydraulic plant model. J. Exp. Bot., 58, 2113–2131.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 61 62 63 64 65 66 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.