Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ASPHC Baner

Vol. 21 No. 5 (2022)

Articles

Evaluating glufosinate-ammonium and flame weeding for weed control in sweet marjoram (Origanum majorana L.) cultivation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2022.5.7
Submitted: October 12, 2021
Published: 28.10.2022

Abstract

The objective of this four-year study was to compare the effects of flame weeding and spraying with glufosinate-ammonium on weed control in sweet marjoram field cultivation. The experiment was set up in a complete randomized four-replicate design with a plot area of 8 m2. Moreover, the content of essential oil in marjoram herb obtained from the control plants, as well as the composition of this oil were also studied. Marjoram emergence began 13–17 days after sowing, and it was very uneven and in some years it was extendend up to 5 weeks. Flaming (90 kg propane ∙ ha–1) was applied in two times: immediately after noticing the first marjoram emergence or 5 days later, while glufosinate-ammonium (600 g ∙ ha–1) was applied on the same date as the first flaming. The tested methods of weeding significantly reduced the number and fresh weight of weeds growing 3–4 weeks after the start of marjoram emergence, i.e. in the period of its greatest sensitivity to weed competition. They had no soil residual activity and their effect on weeds disappeared after the first weeding. Among weeds occurring in the experiment, only barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv.) was partially tolerant to flaming. Flaming applied at the second time did not increase the effectiveness of weed control, but significantly decreased the number of emergence and the yield of marjoram herb. Essential oil content in marjoram grated herb varied considerably depending on the year, ranging from 1.35 to 2.34%. The oil contained from 33 to 36 identified compounds, among which trans-sabinene hydrate (28–34%) and terpinen-4-ol (17–21%) were clearly dominant.

References

  1. Bina, F., Rahimi, R. (2017). Sweet marjoram: a review of ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry, and biological activities. J. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., 22(1), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156587216650793
  2. Berbeć, S. (1969). Wpływ wilgotności gleby na plonowanie i jakość surowca majeranku ogrodowego (Origanum majorana, syn. Majorana hortensis Moench.) [The influence of soil humidity on the yield and quality of raw material of marjoram (Origanum majorana, syn. Majorana hortensis Moench)]. Ann. UMCS, sec. E, 24(19), 289–297.
  3. Błażewicz-Woźniak, M., Kęsik, T., Konopiński, M. (2014). Uprawa roli i roślin z elementami herbologii [Cultivation of soil and plants with elements of herbology]. Wyd. UP w Lublinie, Lublin, 187, 207.
  4. Borowy, A., Kapłan, M. (2022a). Effects of lightless tillage, flame weeding and glufosinate-ammonium on weed suppression in summer savory (Satureja hortensis L.). Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 21(2), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2022.2.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2022.2.2
  5. Borowy, A., Kapłan, M. (2022b). Evaluating chemical and thermal weed suppression in lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) cultivation. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus, 21(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2022.1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2022.1.4
  6. Carrubba, A., Militello, M. (2013). Nonchemical weeding of medicinal and aromatic plants. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 33, 551–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0122-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0122-9
  7. Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91, Article 12, Plant production rules, 1(g), 9.
  8. Czarnecki, M., Załęcki, R. (1986). Wpływ sposobu uprawy majeranku ogrodowego (Origanum majorana L.) na plon i wartość surowca [The influence of cultivation method on the yield and value of marjoram raw material]. Herba Pol., 32(3–4), 217–223.
  9. De Souza, J.M., Filho, C.A., Carini, F., da Costa, S.L., Heinzmann, B.M., Rodrigues, P. (2021). Seasons influence on content, yield and chemical composition of Origanum majorana L. essential oil. Comun. Sci., 12, e3534. https://doi.org/10.14295/CS.v12.3534
  10. Dobrzański A. (1999). Ochrona warzyw przed chwastami [Protection of vegetables from weeds]. PWRiL, Warszawa, pp. 199.
  11. El-Masry, M.H., Charles, D.J., Simon, J.E. (1996). Bentazon and terbacil as postemergent herbicides for sweet basil and sweet marjoram. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants, 3(3), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1300/J044v03n03_04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J044v03n03_04
  12. Gregorczyk, A. (1997). Kinetyka wzrostu elongacyjnego bazylii, cząbru i majeranku [Kinetics of elongation growth of basil, savory and marjoram]. Herba Pol., 43(1), 33–39.
  13. Knežević, S.Z. (2016). Flame weeding as an alternative tool for weed management in agronomic crops: revisiting the old concept. Acta Herbol., 25(2), 69–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/ActaHerb1602069K
  14. Knezevic, S.Z. (2017). Flame weeding in corn, soybean and sunflower. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Information and Communication Technologies in Agriculture, Food and Environment, Chania, Greece, 21–24 Sept., 390–394.
  15. Kucharski, W. (2018). Majeranek ogrodowy (Origanum majorana L.) [Sweet marjoram (Origanum majorana L.)]. In: Uprawa ziół. Poradnik dla plantatorów [Cultivation of herbs. Guide for growers], Kołodziej, B. (ed.). PWRiL, Warszawa, 166–170.
  16. Kuepper, G. (2001). Pursuiting conservation tillage systems for organic crop production. ATTRA’s Organic Matters Series, USA, pp. 28.
  17. Lal, R. (2009). Soils and food sufficiency. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 29, 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008044
  18. Nurzyńska-Wierdak, R., Dzida, K. (2009). Influence of plant density and term of harvest on yield and chemical composition of sweet marjoram (Origanum majorana L.). Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus, 8(1), 51–61.
  19. Nurzyńska-Wierdak, R., Zawiślak, G., Kowalski, R. (2015). The content and composition of essential oil of Origanum majorana L. grown in Poland depending on harvest time and method of raw material preparation. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants, 18(6), 1482–1489. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060X.2013.831569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060X.2013.831569
  20. Pank, F. (1992). The influence of chemical weed control on quality characters of medicinal and aromatic plants. Acta Hortic., 306, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1992.306.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1992.306.14
  21. Postu, P.A., Gorgan, D.L., Cioanca, O., Russ, M., Mikkat, S., Glocker, M.O., Hritcu, L. (2020). Memory-enhancing effects of Origanum majorana essential oil in an Alzheimer’s amyloid beta1-42 rat model: a molecular and behavioral study. Antioxidants, 9, 919. https://doi.org/10/3390/antiox9100919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9100919
  22. Qasem, J., Foy, C. (2006). Selective weed control in Syrian marjoram (Origanum syriacum) with oxadiazon and oxyfuorfen herbicides. Weed Technol., 20(3), 670–676. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-04-1291.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-04-129R1.1
  23. Rumińska, A. (ed.). (1991). Poradnik plantatora ziół [Herb grower’s guide]. PWRiL, Poznań, 228–234.
  24. Sensemann, S.A. (ed.). (2007). Herbicide handbook. WSSA, Lawrence, pp. 458.
  25. Strażyński, P. (ed.). (2020). Zalecenia ochrony roślin rolniczych. T. 3: rośliny oleiste, okopowe, bobowate i zielarskie. Inst. Ochr. Rośl., Państw. Inst. Bad. [Recommendations for agricultural plants protection. Vol. 3. Oil, root, leguminous and herbal plants. Inst. Plant Prot. – Nat. Res. Inst.], Poznań, 446. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156587216650793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2156587216650793
  26. Suchorska-Tropiło, K., Tołwiński, P., (2001). Porównanie wzrostu, rozwoju i plonowania czterech populacji majeranku ogrodowego (Origanum majorana L.) [Comparative study of four ecotypes of marjoram (Origanum majorana L.)]. Folia Hortic., 13(1A), 425–429.
  27. Ulloa, S.M., Datta, A., Knezevic, S.Z. (2010a). Growth stage-influenced differential response of foxtail and pigweed species to broadcast flaming. Weed Technol., 24(3), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-10-00005.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-10-00005.1
  28. Ulloa, S.M., Datta, A., Knezevic, S.Z (2010b). Tolerance of selected weed species to broadcast flaming at different growth stages. Crop Prot., 29(12), 1381–1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2010.07.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2010.07.017
  29. Van den Dool, H., Kratz, P.D. (1963). A generalization of the retention index system including linear temperature programmed gas-liquid partition chromatography. J. Chromat., 11, 463–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)80947-X
  30. Wittman, S., Jüttner, I., Mempel, H. (2020). Indoor farming marjoram production-quality, resource efficiency, and potential of application. Agronomy, 10, 1769. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111769 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111769
  31. Zawiślak, G. (2008). Dependence on harvest date and yielding of marjoram (Origanum majorana L.) cv. ‘Miraż’ cultivated from a seedling. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus, 7(2), 73–81.
  32. Zawiślak, G., Dzida, K. (2010). Yield and quality of sweet marjoram herb depending on harvest time. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus, 9(1), 65–72.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.