Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ASPHC Baner

Vol. 21 No. 6 (2022)

Articles

Comparison of the effectiveness of flaming and spraying with glufosinate-ammonium in controlling weeds in thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) sowing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2022.6.4
Submitted: 21 February 2022
Published: 30.12.2022

Abstract

The purpose of this four-year study was to compare the effectiveness of flame weeding applied on two dates to that of spraying with glufosinate ammonium in controlling weeds in common thyme grown from sowing directly into the field. Flaming (90 kg propane∙ha–1) was applied immediately before thyme emergence or 6 days later, and glufosinate-ammonium (450 g∙ha–1) was applied on the same date as the first flaming. Emergence of thyme began 15–18 days after sowing, was very uneven and in some years it was extended up to 4 weeks. Thyme seedlings were very fine and their initial growth was very slow, which made them highly sensitive to the competition of weeds. The growth rate of thyme  increased over time, reaching its greatest value in the last ten days prior to harvest, when the plants gained their average height, depending on the year, from 18.3 to 22.4 cm and developed from 17 to 21 first and second order branches. Weeds started to emerge 8–11 days after thyme was sown and about 3 weeks later their number in the control plots varied depending on the year from 175 to 541 pcs.∙m–2. All methods were very effective in controlling weeds immediately after treatment, but had no soil residual activity and soon new weeds emerged. Four weeks later, the most effective method was spraying with glufosinate-ammonium, which, depending on the year, reduced both the number and fresh weight of weeds by 43 to 85%. Flaming applied at the first or second dates controlled 33–59% and 37–68% of weeds, respectively. After first weeding, the differences between compared treatments disappeared. Essential oil content in the grated herb obtained from the control plants ranged from 2.5 to 3.4%. In the oil, a total of 39 compounds were identified, with the number ranging from 33 to 36 in individual years. More than half of the essential oil was thymol and two other important compounds were γ-terpinene and p-cymene.

References

  1. Almanea, A., Abd El-Aziz, G.S., Ahmed, M.M.M. (2019). The potential gastrointestinal health benefits of Thymus vulgaris essential oil: a review. Biomed. Pharmacol. J., 12(4), 1793–1799. https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1810 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1810
  2. Ascard, J. (1995). Effects of flame weeding on weed species at different developmental stages. Weed Res., 35(5), 397–411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1995.tb01636.x
  3. Błażewicz-Woźniak, M., Kęsik, T., Konopiński, M. (2014). Uprawa roli i roślin z elementami herbologii [Cultivation of soil and plants with elements of herbology]. Wyd. UP w Lublinie, Lublin, 184–185, 187–189, 207 [in Polish].
  4. Borowy, A., Kapłan, M. (2022a). Evaluating glufosinate-ammonium and flame weeding for weed control in sweet marjoram (Origanum majorana L.) cultivation. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 21(5), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2022.5.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2022.5.7
  5. Borowy, A., Kapłan, M. (2022b). Evaluating chemical and thermal weed suppression in lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) cultivation. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 21(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/1024326/asphc.2022.1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2022.1.4
  6. Carrubba, A., Militello, M. (2013). Nonchemical weeding of medicinal and aromatic plants. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 33(3), 551–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0122-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0122-9
  7. Council Regulation (2007). EC Regulation No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91, Article 12, Plant production rules, 1(g), 9.
  8. Czarnecki, M., Załęcki, R. (1990). Dobór herbicydów w uprawie tymianku właściwego (Thy-mus vulgaris L.) [Selection of herbicides in the cultivation of garden thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.)]. Herba Pol., 36, 13–18 [in Polish].
  9. Dzida, K., Zawiślak, G., Karczmarz, K. (2015). Yields and biological value of three herbal species from the Lamiaceae family. J. Elem., 20(2), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2014.19.4.616 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2014.19.4.616
  10. European Pharmacopoeia, 5th ed. (2005). Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 217–218, 2205–2206.
  11. Fraser, S., Whish, J.M.P. (1997). A commercial herb industry for NSW – an Infant Enterprise. Report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Dept. Agron. Soil Sci., Univ. New Eng., Austral., RIRDC Res. Paper Series No 97/18, 32–33.
  12. James, T.K., Rahman, A., Douglas, J.A. (1991). Control of weeds in five herb crops. Proc. 44th New Zealand Weed Pest Contr. Conf., 116–120. https://doi.org/10.30843/nzpp.1991.44.10837 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30843/nzpp.1991.44.10837
  13. Knežević, S.Z. (2016). Flame weeding as an alternative tool for weed management in agronomic crops: revisiting the old concept. Acta Herb., 25(2), 69–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/ActaHerb1602069K
  14. Knezevic, S.Z. (2017). Flame weeding in corn, soybean and sunflower. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Inform. Comm. Technol. Agric., Food Environ., Chania, Greece, 21–24 Sept., 390–394.
  15. Kołodziej, B. (2009). Wpływ sposobu zakładania plantacji i nawożenia dolistnego na plon i jakość tymianku [The effect of plantation establishment method and foliar fertilization on the yields and quality of thyme]. Ann. UMCS, sec. E, Agricultura, 64(2), 1–7 [in Polish]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2009.2.1
  16. Kosakowska, O., Bączek, K., Przybył, J.L., Pawełczak, A., Rolewska, K., Węglarz, Z. (2020). Morphological and chemical traits as quality determinants of common thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.), on the example of ’Standard Winterʼ cultivar. Agronomy, 10, 909. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060909
  17. Kosakowska, O., Węglarz, Z., Bączek, K. (2021). The effect of open field and foil tunel on yield and quality of common thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.), in organic farming. Agronomy, 11, 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020197
  18. Król, B., Kiełtyka-Dadasiewicz, A. (2015). Yield and herb quality of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) depending on harvest time. Turk. J. Field Crops, 20(1), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.17557/.89347 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17557/.89347
  19. Kucharski, W.A., Mordalski, R. (2005). Ocena możliwości zastosowania preparatu Goltix 700 SC w tymianku właściwym (Thymus vulgaris L.) uprawianym na surowiec zielarski [Evaluation of the possibilities of application of Goltix 700 SC during garden thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) cultivation for raw material]. Prog. Plant Protect., 45(2), 828–830 [in Polish].
  20. Kucharski, W.A., Mordalski, R. (2007). Wpływ sposobu odchwaszczania plantacji na plonowanie wybranych gatunków roślin olejkowych [An influence of the different methods of weeding on the selected aromatic plant yielding]. Prog. Plant Protect., 47(3), 173–176 [in Polish].
  21. Kwiatkowski, C. (2007). Zachwaszczenie i plonowanie tymianku właściwego (Thymus vulgar-is L.) w zależności od sposobu pielęgnacji i przedplonu [Weed infestation and yielding of garden thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) in relation to protection method and forecrop]. Prog. Plant Protect., 47(3), 187–190 [in Polish].
  22. Kwiatkowski, C., Kołodziej, B. (2005). Wpływ przedplonu i sposobu pielęgnacji na zachwaszczenie łanu i jakość surowca tymianku właściwego (Thymus vulgaris L.) [The effect of forecrop and protection method on the canopy weed infestation and raw material quality of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.)]. Ann. UMCS, sec. E, Agricultura, 60, 175–184 [in Polish].
  23. Michaud, M.H., Gosselin, A., Tremblay, N., Benoit, D.L., Bélanger, A., Desroches, B. (1993). Effect of a herbicide and two plant densities on the yield of medicinal plants grown in Quebec (Canada). Acta Hortic., 331, 311–318. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1993.331.42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1993.331.42
  24. Moaveni, P., Farahani, H.A., Maroufi, K. (2011). Effects of sowing date and planting density on quantity and quality features in thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.). Adv. Environ. Biol., 5(7), 1706–1710.
  25. Najar, B., Pistelli, L., Ferri, B., Angelini, L.G., Tavarini, S. (2021). Crop yield and essential oil composition of two Thymus vulgaris chemotypes along three years of organic cultivation in a hilly area of central Italy. Molecules, 26, 5109. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26165109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26165109
  26. Nikolova, M., Tryakova, B., Yankova-Tsvetkova, E., Stefanova, T., Dzhurmanski, A., Aneva, I., Berkov, S. (2021). Herbicide potential of selected essential oils from plants of Lamiaceae and Asteraceae families. Acta Agrobot., 74, article 7411. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.7411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.7411
  27. Pank, F. (1992). The influence of chemical weed control on quality characters of medicinal and aromatic plants. Acta Hortic., 306, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1992.306.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1992.306.14
  28. Raal, A., Arak, E., Orav, A. (2005). Comparative chemical composition of the essential oil of Thymus vulgaris L. from different geographical sources. Herba Pol., 51(1/2), 10–16.
  29. Senseman, S.A. (ed.), (2007). Herbicide Handbook, 9th ed. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL, pp. 458.
  30. Strażyński, P. (ed.), (2020). Zalecenia ochrony roślin rolniczych. T. 3: Rośliny oleiste, okopowe, bobowate i zielarskie. Tymianek właściwy. Inst. Ochr. Rośl., Państw. Inst. Bad. [Recommendations for agricultural plants protection. Vol. 3: oil, root, leguminous and herbal plants. Common thyme. Inst. Plant Prot. – Nat. Res. Inst.], Poznań, 478–480 [in Polish]. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156587216650793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2156587216650793
  31. Van Den Dool, H., Kratz, P.D. (1963). A generalization of the retention index system including linear temperature programmed gas-liquid partition chromatography. J. Chromat., 11, 463–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)80947-X
  32. Watts, M. (2008). Glufosinate-ammonium monograph. Pesticide Action Network Asia and the Pacific., 12 Dec. Available: http://www.panap.net [date of access: 18.02.2022].
  33. Zawiślak, G. (2006). Wzrost i plonowanie szałwii lekarskiej (Salvia officinalis L.) oraz tymianku pospolitego (Thymus vulgaris L.) w południowo-wschodniej Polsce [Growth and yielding of common sage (Salvia officinalis L.) and common thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) in south-eastern Poland]. Folia Hortic., supl. 2, 213–218 [in Polish].
  34. Zawiślak, G. (2007). Analysis of chemical composition of essential oil in the herb of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) grown in south-eastern Poland. Herba Pol., 53(3), 241–244.
  35. Zawiślak, G. (2018). Tymianek pospolity (Thymus vulgaris L.) [Common thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.)]. In: Uprawa ziół. Poradnik dla plantatorów [Cultivation of herbs. Guide for growers], Kołodziej, B. (ed.). PWRiL, Warszawa, 423–426 [in Polish].
  36. Zimdahl, R.L., (2004). Weed – crop competition: a review. Wiley – Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470290224
  37. http://polishherbs.com/thyme/ [date of access: 25.03.2022].

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.