Abstrakt
Ninety-seven tomato landraces collected from East Anatolian region of Turkey and North-West of Iran, along with three commercial cultivars were evaluated during two years. Experiment was carried out in an alpha lattice design at Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center of West Azerbaijan, Iran. Analysis of variance revealed significant variation (P ≤ 0.01) among genotypes for all the experimental characters. Yield showed a positive and significant correlation with length and width of cotyledon leaf, length and width of true leaf, fruit weight, fruit length and diameter, pericarp thickness and fruit peduncle length. In principal component analysis, the first three components explained for 71.6% of total variations among genotypes. Since the first component determined 50% of total variations and yield had high significant coefficient with this component, thus it might be used as s selection criteria to identify genotypes with high yield in breeding programs. Cluster analysis using Ward method classified genotypes into five groups. Groups included: early maturing genotypes in group I, genotypes with high yield
in group II, genotypes with large fruit in group III, late maturing and high total soluble solids (TSS) genotypes in group IV and genotypes with high acidity in group V.
Bibliografia
Agong, S.G., Schittenhelm, S., Friedt, W. (2001). Genotipic variation of Kenyan tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) germplasm. J. Food Technol. Africa, 6(1), 13–17.
Al-Aysh, F., Kutma, H., Al- Zouabi, A. (2012). Genetic variation, heritability and interrelationships of some important characteristics in Syrian tomato landraces (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Acad. Arena, 4(10), 1–5.
Bernousi, I., Emami, A., Tajbakhsh, M., Darvishzadeh, R., Henareh, M. (2011). Studies on genetic variability and correlation among the different traits in Solanum lycopersicum L. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj., 39(1), 152–158.
Emami, A., Eivazi, A.R. (2013). Evaluation of genetic variations of tomato genotypes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) with multivariate analysis. Internat. J. Sci. Res. Environ. Sci., 1(10), 273–284.
FAOSTAT, 2012. http://faostat.fao.org.
Foolad, M.R. (2007). Genome mapping and molecular breeding of tomato. Internat. J. Plant Genom., 2007, 1– 52.
Frankel, H., Brudon, J.J., Peacock, W.J. (1995). Landraces in transit-the threat perceived. Diversity, 11, 14–15.
Ibarbia, E.A., Lambeth, V.N. (1971). Tomato fruit size and quality inter relationships. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 94, 496–498.
Mazzucato, A., Papa, R., Bitocchi, E., Mosconi, P., Nanni, L., Negri, V., Picarella, M.E., Siligato, F., Soressi, G.P., Tiranti, B., Veronesi, F. (2008). Genetic diversity, structure and marker-trait associations in a collection of Italian tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) landraces. Theor. Appl. Genet., 116(5), 657–669.
Mazzucato, A., Ficcadenti, N., Caioni, M., Mosconi, P., Piccinini, E., Sanampudi, V.R.R., Sestili, S., Ferrari, V. (2010). Genetic diversity and distinctiveness in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) landraces: The Italian case study of ‘A pera Abruzzese’. Sci. Hortic., 125, 55–62.
Mwirigi, P.N., Kahangi, E.M., Nyende, A.B., Mamati, E.G. (2009). Morphological variability within the Kenyan yam (Dioscorea spp.). J. Appl. Biosci., 16, 894–901.
Osei, M.K., Bonsu, K.O., Agyeman, A., Choi, H.S. (2014). Genetic diversity of tomato germplasm in Ghana using morphological characters. Internat. J. Plant Soil Sci., 3(3), 220–231.
Passam, H.C., Karapanos, I.C., Bebeli, P.J., Savvas, D. (2007). A review of recent research on tomato nutrition, breeding and post-harvest technology with reference to fruit quality. Europ. J. Plant Sci. Biotech., 1(1), 1–21.
Reddy, B.R., Reddy, M.P., Begum, H., Sunil, N. (2013). Genetic diversity studies in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J. Agricult. Vet. Sci., 4, 53–55.
Shfiee, R. (2000). Study of agronomic character and grouping of tomato breeding lines. The Second Horticultural Sciences Congress of Iran. Karaj, Iran, (In Persian).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
