Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki

Tom 11 Nr 2 (2012)

Artykuły

WEED INFESTATION OF PEA (Pisum sativum L.) CROP UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF PLOUGH AND PLOUGHLESS TILLAGE

Przesłane: 23 grudnia 2020
Opublikowane: 2012-04-30

Abstrakt

Weed infestation depends on soil diaspore bank, the habitat conditions and the applied agricultural practices. Tillage constitutes one of the agrotechnical factors which significantly influence the condition and the level of weed infestation. In the conducted research, ploughless tillage practice and the application of herbicides considerably increased the number and the air-dry matter of weed populations per 1 m2 of pea crop compared to plough tillage. It was also established that the number of weeds per 1 m2 in the first term of weed infestation evaluation (in the phase of third true leaf) exceeded the number of weeds in the second term (ripening of pods and seeds). On the other hand, the air-dry matter of weeds was higher in the second term of evaluation. In addition, analyses revealed a higher number of weed species under the conditions of ploughless tillage (20–22 species) and herbicide application (20 species) than in the conventional tillage system
(14–16 species). The predominant species under the conditions of conventional tillage were: Amaranthus retroflexus L. and Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P.B. (in the first term of evaluation), and Avena fatua L. and Chenopodium album L. (in the second term). The predominant species in the ploughless tillage were: Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P.B. and Amaranthus retroflexus L. (in the first term) as well as Fallopia convolvulus (L.) A. Löve, Avena fatua L. and Galinsoga praviflora Cav. (in the second term). In case of herbicide application, the prevailing species were: Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P.B. and Matricaria inodora L. (in the first term) as well as Matricaria inodora L. and Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P.B. (in the second term). The reduced tillage increased the number of perennial weeds: Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop., Elymus repens (L.) P.B. and Convolvulus arvensis L.

Bibliografia

Blecharczyk A., Małecka I., Sawińska Z., 2010. Zachwaszczenie grochu w siewie bezpośrednim. Prog. Plant Protection / Postępy w Ochronie Roślin, 50 (2), 775–778.
Błażewicz-Woźniak M., Konopiński M., 2011. Effect of soil cultivation and intercrop plant growing upon weed infestation of Spanish salsify (Scorzonera hispanica L.). Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 10(2), 153–166.
Błażewicz-Woźniak M., Kęsik T., Wach D., Konopiński M., 2008. The influence of conservation tillage on the mineral elements content in soil and chemical composition of onion. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 7(2), 61–72.
Brandsaeter L. O., Bakken A.K., Mangerud K., Riley H., Eltun R., Fyske H., 2011. Effects of tractor weight, wheel placement and depth of ploughing on the infestation of perennial weeds in organically farmed cereals. Eur. J. Agron., 34, 4, 239–246.
Buhler D., Stoltenberg D., Becker R., Gunsolus J., 1994. Perennial weed populations after 14 years of variable tillage and cropping practices. Weed Sci., 42, 205–209.
Faltyn U., Kordas L., 2009. Wpływ uprawy roli i czynników regenerujących stanowisko na zachwaszczenie pszenicy jarej. Fragm. Agron., 26(1), 19–24.
Fykse H., Waernhus K., 1999. Weed development in cereals under different growth conditions and control intensities. Acta Agric. Scandinavica, sect. B, Soil Plant Sci., 49, 3, 134–142.
Gruber S., Claupein W., 2009. Effect of tillage intensity on weed infestation in organic farming. Soil Till. Res., 105, 1, 104–111.
Knezević M., Bolicević R., Ranogajec L., 2009. Influence of soil tillage and low herbicide doses on weed dry weigh and cereals crop yields. Herbologia 10,1, 79–88.
Konopiński M., 2011. Influence of intercrop plants and varied tillage on yield and nutritional value of scorzonera (Scorzonera hispanica L.) Roots. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 10(1), 49–59.
Kraska P., Pałys E., 2006. Zachwaszczenie łanu jęczmienia jarego w warunkach zróżnicowanych systemów uprawy roli oraz poziomów nawożenia i ochrony. Acta Agrobot. 59 (2), 323–333.
Locke M.A., Reddy K.N., Zablotowicz R.M., 2002. Weed management in conservation crop production systems. Weed Biol. Manag., 2, 123–132.
Lundkvist A., 2009. Effect of pre- and post- emergence weed harrowing on annual weeds in peas and spring cereals. Weed Res., 49, 4, 409–416.
Małecka I., Blecharczyk A., Dobrzeniecki T., 2006. Zachwaszczenie zbóż ozimych w zależności od systemu uprawy roli. Prog. Plant Protection / Postępy w Ochronie Roślin, 46 (2), 253–255.
Mas M.T., Verdu A.M.C., 2003. Tillage system effect on weed communities in 4-years crop rotation under Mediterranean dryland conditions. Soli Till. Res. 74, 15–24.
Pilipavicius V., Lazauskas P., Jasinskaite S., 2009. Weed control by two layer ploughing and post-emergence crop tillage in spring wheat and buckwheat. Agron. Res., 7, 444–450.
Tuesca D., Puricelli E., Papa J.C., 2001. A long-term study of weed flora shifts in different tillage systems. Weed Res., 41, 369–382.
Weber R., Hryńczuk B., 2005. Wpływ sposobu uprawy roli i przedplonu na zachwaszczenie pszenicy ozimej. Annales UMCS, sect. E, Agricultura, 60, 93–102.
Wesołowski M., Woźniak A., 2001. Zachwaszczenie aktualne i potencjalne zbóż jarych w różnych systemach następstwa roślin. Acta Agrobot., 54 (1), 175–190.
Woźniak A., 2011. Weed infestation of spring wheat crop under the conditions of plough and ploughless tillage. Acta Agrobot., 64 (3), 133–140.
Wrzesińska E., Dzienia S., Wereszczaka J., 2003. Wpływ systemów uprawy roli na ilość i rozmieszczenie nasion chwastów w glebie. Acta Sci. Pol., Agricultura 2 (1), 169–175.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.