Influence of forest fragmentation on the game species population
Piotr Czyżowski
Department of Pet Breeding and Wildlife Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 LublinMirosław Karpiński
Department of Pet Breeding and Wildlife Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 LublinRyszard Rachfałowski
Department of Pet Breeding and Wildlife Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 LublinAbstrakt
The survey aimed at evaluating the influence of forest fragmentation on game species population. Borders of forest areas in forest districts in the Lublin region were measured according to the cartographic method. The coefficient of forest fragmentation (km/km2) was calculated as a total forest boundary length (km) to the total forest surface area (km2) in a given forest inspectorate
ratio. Based on the obtained data, the obtainment Pearson's correlation coefficients between forest boundaries length (km) and their fragmentation coefficient (km/km2) vs. hunting obtainment
size in the analyzed periods were calculated. The results showed that the European red deer occurrence is associated with the presence of compact forest complexes. Our results indicate the positive
influence of forest fragmentation on the wild boar, brown hare and red fox populations size.
Słowa kluczowe:
forest fragmentation, landscape structure, game density, harvestingBibliografia
White-tailed deer harvest from the chronic wasting disease eradication zone in south-central Wisconsin. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 34, 3, 725–731.
Borkowski J., Pudełko M., 2007. Forest habitat use and home-range size in radio-collared fallow deer. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 44, 107–114.
Brennan M., Moller H., Parkes J.P., 1993. Indices of density of feral goats in a grassland/forest habitat, Marlborough, New Zealand. N. Zeal. J. Zool. 17 (2), 103–106.
Csányi S., 1995. Wild boar population dynamics and management in Hungary. Ibex 3, 222–225.
Drozd L., 1988. Wpływ rozdrobnienia kompleksów leśnych na szkody wyrządzane przez dziki w uprawach polowych w makroregionie środkowo-wschodniej Polski. Sylwan 11–12, 79–84.
Fruziński B., Kałuziński J., Baksalary J., 1982. Weight and body measurements of forest and field roe deer. Act. Theriol. 27 (25–37), 479–488.
Goszczyński J., 1985. Wpływ strukturalnego zróżnicowania krajobrazu ekologicznego na przebieg interakcji drapieżnik–ofiara. Rozprawy naukowe i monografie. Wyd. SGGW-AR Warszawa, 1–80.
Haber A., Pasławski T., Zaborowski S., 1977. Gospodarstwo łowieckie. PWN, wyd. II, Warszawa, 1–374.
Harris L.D., 1984. The fragmented forest: island biogeogrpahy theory and the preservation of biotic diversity. University of Chicago Press, 1–230.
Hartl G.B., Markov G., Rubin A., Findo S., Lang G., Willing R., 1993. Allozyme diversity within and among populations of three ungulate species (Cervus elaphus, Capreolus capreolus, Sus
scrofa) of southeastern and central Europe. Z Säugetierk, 58, 352–361.
Hewison A.J.M., Vincent J.P., Joachim J., Angibault J.M., Cargnelutti B., Cibien C., 2001. The effect of woodland fragmentation and human activity on roe deer distribution in agricultural landscapes. Can. J. Zool. 79 (4), 679–689.
Hoffman R.R., Saber A.S., Pielowski Z., Fruziński B., 1988. Comparative morphological investigations of forest and field ecotypes of deer in Poland. Act. Theriol. 33 (1–11), 103–114.
Jepsen J.U., Topping C.J., 2004. Modelling roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a gradient of forest fragmentation: behavioural plasticity and choice of cover. Can. J. Zool. 82 (9), 1528–1541.
Malin H., 1989. Wald und Wild in Vorarlberg. Die Kleine Waldzeitung des Vorarlberger Waldvereins 4, 4–6.
Mysterud A., Meisingset E.L., Veiberg V., Langvatn R., Solberg E.J., Loe L.E., Stenseth N.C., 2007. Monitoring population size of red deer Cervus elaphus: an evaluation of two types of census data from Norway. Wildl. Biol. 13, 285–298.
Nyberg J.B., Janz D.W. (eds.), 1990. Deer and elk habitats in coastal forests of southern British Columbia. Special Report Series 5. B.C. Ministry of Forests, B.C. Ministry of Environment. Published by Research Branch Ministry of Forests, Victoria, B.C.
Olaczek R., 1976. Zmiany w szacie roślinnej Polski od połowy XIX wieku do lat bieżących. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 177, 369–402.
Panek M., Kamieniarz R., 1999. Relationships between density of brown hare Lepus europaeus and landscape structure in Poland in the years 1981–1995. Act. Theriol. 44 (1), 67–75.
Saϊd S., Servanty S., 2005. The influence of landscape structure on female roe deer home-range size. Landsc. Ecol. 20, 1003–1012.
Tomek A., 2002. Właściwości i struktura populacji jelenia (Cervus elaphus L.) w lasach krynickich (Karpaty). Zesz. Nauk. AR w Krakowie, ser. Rozprawy, 278, 1–100.
Virgós E., 2002. Factors affecting wild boar (Sus scrofa) occurrence in highly fragmented Mediterranean landscapes. Can. J. Zool. 80 (3), 430–435.
Department of Pet Breeding and Wildlife Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin
Department of Pet Breeding and Wildlife Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin
Department of Pet Breeding and Wildlife Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin
Licencja
Od 2022 r. artykuły są udostępniane na zasadach licencji Creative Commons uznanie autorstwa 4.0 międzynarodowa (CC BY 4.0). Artykuły opublikowane przed 2022 r. są dostępne na zasadach licencji Creative Commons uznanie autorstwa – użycie niekomercyjne – bez utworów zależnych 4.0 międzynarodowa (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Przysłanie artykułu do redakcji oznacza, że nie był on opublikowany wcześniej, nie jest rozpatrywany do publikacji w innych wydawnictwach.
Autor podpisuje oświadczenie o oryginalności dzieła i wkładzie poszczególnych osób.
