Abstrakt
Carbon farming and nutrient management, a sustainable pro-environmental and pro-climate approach to enhance soil quality and mitigate carbon losses, faces implementation challenges in the European Union. To explore potentially existing barriers, a survey involved 122 Polish farmers, representing diverse systems and land-use. Utilizing structured questionnaires, in-depth interviews,
and Principal Component Analysis, we assessed farmers’ perceptions of six pro-environmental and pro-climate measures. The survey highlighted factors influencing farmers’ willingness to adopt surveyed practices, revealing that the potential to enhance soil carbon and nitrogen stocks outweighed the impact of subsidies, bureaucracy, age, and farm size. Barriers included technical challenges and machinery limitations, notably hindering manure and slurry incorporation. Conservation tillage was considered least feasible nationally, attributed to machinery needs and a preference for conventional practices. Addressing these challenges, especially in conservation tillage, requires targeted education. Raising awareness about measures’ impact on soil carbon stock emerged as a potent means to overcome identified barriers.
Bibliografia
- Abdi H., Williams L.J., 2010. Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev., Comput. Stat. 2(4), 433–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101
- Billen G., Aguilera E., Einarsson R., Garnier J., Gingrich S., Grizzetti B., Lassaletta L., Le Noë J., Sanz-Cobena A., 2024. Beyond the farm to fork strategy. Methodology for designing a European agro-ecological future. Sci. Total Environ. 908, 168160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168160
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168160
- Bumbiere K., Diaz Sanchez F.A., Pubule J., Blumberga D., 2022. Development and assessment of carbon farming solutions. Environ. Climate Technol. 26(1), 898–916. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0068
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0068
- Chen L., Sun S., Yao B., Peng Y., Gao C., Qin T., Zhou Y., Sun C., Quan W., 2022. Effects of straw return and straw biochar on soil properties and crop growth: A review. Front. Plant Sci. 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.986763
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.986763
- Cheung A., 2020. Structuredq. In: F. Maggino (ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Springer International Publishing, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_2888-2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_2888-2
- Cuadros-Casanova I., Cristiano A., Biancolini D., Cimatti M., Sessa A.A., Mendez Angarita V.Y., Dragonetti C., Pacifici M., Rondinini C., Di Marco M., 2023. Opportunities and challenges for Common Agricultural Policy reform to support the European Green Deal. Conserv. Biol. 37(3), e14052. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14052
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14052
- Eco-scheme: Carbon Farming and Nutrient Management measures. Retrieved November 15, 2023, https://www.gov.pl/web/rolnictwo/ekoschemat-rolnictwo-weglowe-i-zarzadzanie-skladnikami-odzywczymi [access: 18.06.2023].
- Emmerling C., Krein A., Junk J., 2020. Meta-analysis of strategies to reduce NH3 emissions from slurries in European agriculture and consequences for greenhouse gas emissions. Agronomy 10(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111633
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111633
- Eppich W.J., Gormley G.J., Teunissen P.W., 2019. In-depth interviews. In: D. Nestel, J. Hui, K. Kunkler, M.W. Scerbo, A.W. Calhoun (ed.), Healthcare simulation research. A practical guide. Springer International Publishing, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26837-4_12
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26837-4_12
- European Commission, 2020. A new circular economy action plan. For a cleaner and more competitive Europe. COM(2020) 98.
- European Commission, 2021. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Sustainable Carbon Cycles. COM(2021) 800.
- European Commission, 2022. Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Establishing a Union certification framework for carbon removals. COM(2022) 672.
- EUROSTAT, 2021. Eurostat Farm Typology Glossary. Retrieved November 19, 2023, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?oldid=475630 [access: 21.06.2023].
- Faichuk O., Voliak L., Hutsol T., Glowacki S., Pantsyr Y., Slobodian S., Szeląg-Sikora A., Gródek-Szostak Z., 2022. European green deal. Threats assessment for agri-food exporting countries to the EU. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073712
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073712
- Firth A.G., Brooks J.P., Locke M.A., Morin D.J., Brown A., Baker B.H., 2022. Dynamics of soil organic carbon and CO2 flux under cover crop and no-till management in soybean cropping systems of the Mid-South (USA). Environments 9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/environments9090109
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/environments9090109
- Han X., Xu C., Dungait J.A.J., Bol R., Wang X., Wu W., Meng F., 2018. Straw incorporation increases crop yield and soil organic carbon sequestration but varies under different natural conditions and farming practices in China. A system analysis. Biogeosciences 15(7), 1933–1946. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1933-2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1933-2018
- Heyl K., Döring T., Garske B., Stubenrauch J., Ekardt F., 2021. The common agricultural policy beyond 2020. A critical review in light of global environmental goals. Rev. Europ. Compar. Intern. Environ. Law 30(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12351
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12351
- Hou Y., Velthof G.L., Oenema O., 2015. Mitigation of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane emissions from manure management chains. A meta-analysis and integrated assessment. Glob. Change Biol. 21(3), 1293–1312. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12767
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12767
- Ilakiya T., Swarnapriya R., Pugalendhi L., Geethalakshmi V., Lakshmanan A., Kumar M., Lorenzo J.M., 2023. Carbon accumulation, soil microbial and enzyme activities in elephant foot yambased intercropping system. Agriculture 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13010187
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13010187
- Jayaraman S., Dang Y.P., Naorem A., Page K.L., Dalal R.C., 2021. Conservation agriculture as a system to enhance ecosystem services. Agriculture 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080718
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080718
- Jayaraman S., Sahu M., Sinha N.K., Mohanty M., Chaudhary R.S., Yadav B., Srivastava L.K., Hati K.M., Patra A.K., Dalal R.C., 2022. Conservation agricultural practices impact on soil organic
- carbon, soil aggregation and greenhouse gas emission in a vertisol. Agriculture 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12071004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12071004
- Jongeneel R., Gonzalez-Martinez A., 2023. Implementing the EU eco-scheme in the Netherlands. A results-based points system approach. EuroChoices 22(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12388
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12388
- Kertész Á., Madarász B., 2014. Conservation agriculture in Europe. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 2(1), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-6339(15)30016-2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-6339(15)30016-2
- Khangura R., Ferris D., Wagg C., Bowyer J., 2023. Regenerative agriculture. A literature review on the practices and mechanisms used to improve soil health. Sustainability 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032338
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032338
- Lê S., Josse J., Husson F., 2008. FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Software 25(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01
- Leenstra F., Vellinga T., Neijenhuis F., de Buisonjé F., Gollenbeek L., 2019. Manure: a valuable resource. Wageningen: Wageningen UR Livestock Research, pp. 35. http://edepot.wur.nl/294017
- Liu Z., Wang D., Ning T., Zhang S., Yang Y., He Z., Li Z., 2017. Sustainability assessment of straw utilization circulation modes based on the emergetic ecological. Ecol. Indic. 75, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.024
- Lo Y.-L., Clark C.D., Boyer C.N., Lambert D.M., English B.C., Walker F.R., 2021. Middle and West Tennessee producer perceptions of no-till and cover crops. J. Soil Water Conserv. 76(5), 392–402. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2021.02169
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2021.02169
- Manley J., Van Kooten G.C., Moeltner K., Johnson D.W., 2005. Creating carbon offsets in agriculture through no-till cultivation: A meta-analysis of costs and carbon benefits. Climatic Change 68(1–2), 41–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-6010-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-6010-4
- Pagano M.C., Correa E.J.A., Duarte N.F., Yelikbayev B., O’Donovan A., Gupta V. K., 2017. Advances in eco-efficient agriculture. The plant-soil mycobiome. Agriculture 7(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7020014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7020014
- Petsakos A., Ciaian P., Espinosa M., Perni A., Kremmydas D., 2023. Farm-level impacts of the CAP post-2020 reform. A scenario-based analysis. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 45(2), 1168–1188. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13257
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13257
- Poláková J., Janků J., Holec J., Soukup J., 2023. Soil-water effects of good agricultural and environmental conditions should be weighed in conjunction with carbon farming. Agronomy 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041002
- Runge T., Latacz-Lohmann U., Schaller L., Todorova K., Daugbjerg C., Termansen M., Liira J., Le Gloux F., Dupraz P., Leppanen J., Prokofieva I., Velazquez F.J.B., 2022. Implementation of Eco-schemes in fifteen European Union member states. EuroChoices 21(2), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12352
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12352
- Schaefer M.V, Bogie N.A., Rath D., Marklein A.R., Garniwan A., Haensel T., Lin Y., Avila C. C., Nico P.S., Scow K.M., Brodie E.L., Riley W.J., Fogel M.L., Berhe A.A., Ghezzehei T.A., Parikh S., Keiluweit M., Ying S.C., 2020. Effect of cover crop on carbon distribution in size and density separated soil aggregates. Soil Systems 4(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems4010006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems4010006
- Sharma M., Kaushal R., Kaushik P., Ramakrishna S., 2021. Carbon farming. Prospects and challenges. Sustainability 13(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911122
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911122
- Sikora A., 2021. European Green Deal – legal and financial challenges of the climate change. ERA Forum 21(4), 681–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-020-00637-3
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-020-00637-3
- Styburski W., Kozera-Kowalska M., Uglis, J., 2023. Ecoschemes as a new tool to support agriculture. The state of implementation in Poland. Ann. Pol. Assoc. Agric. Agribus. Econ.. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:262227707
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.7749
- Su Y., Lv J.L., Yu M., Ma Z.H., Xi H., Kou C.L., He Z.C., Shen A.L., 2020. Long-term decomposed straw return positively affects the soil microbial community. J. Appl. Microbiol. 128(1), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14435
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14435
- Dz.U.2023.412 – Act of February 8, 2023 on the Strategic Plan for the Common Agricultural Policy for 2023–2027 [Ustawa z dnia 8 lutego 2023 r o Planie Strategicznym dla Wspólnej Polityki Rolnej na lata 2023–2027].
- Van Hoof S., 2023. Climate change mitigation in agriculture. Barriers to the adoption of carbon farming policies in the EU. Sustainability 15(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310452
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310452
- Velthof G.L., Kuikman P.J., Oenema O., 2003. Nitrous oxide emission from animal manures applied to soil under controlled conditions. Biol. Fertil. Soils 37(4), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-003-0589-2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-003-0589-2
- Velthof G.L., Mosquera J., 2011. The impact of slurry application technique on nitrous oxide emission from agricultural soils. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 140(1–2), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGEE.2010.12.017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.017
- Velthof, G., van Schooten, H., & van Dijk, W., 2020. Optimization of the nutrient management of silage maize cropping systems in the netherlands: A review. Agronomy, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121861
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121861
- Walczak J., Poczta W., Pomianek B., Skowrońska, M., Sadowski A., Izydorczyk K., Frątczak W., 2022. Environmental and climatic consequences of the intensification, scale and concentration of agricultural production. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. https://doi.org/10.7366/9788367450096
- Wang H., Wang S., Yu Q., Zhang Y., Wang R., Li J., Wang X., 2020. No tillage increases soil organic carbon storage and decreases carbon dioxide emission in the crop residue-returned farming system. J. Environ. Manag. 261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110261
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110261
- Wrzaszcz W., 2023. Zielona transformacja polityki rolnej w Unii Europejskiej [The green transformation of agricultural policy in the European Union]. In: Zielone finanse [Green finance].
- Komitet Prognoz „Polska 2000 Plus” przy Prezydium PAN, Warszawa, 81–112. http://publikacje.pan.pl/Content/127148/PDF/2021-ZFIN-07.pdf [access: 21.06.2023].
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
-
Tomáš Lošák,
Barbara Wiśniowska-Kielian,
Fertilization of garlic (Allium sativum L.) with nitrogen and sulphur
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 61 (2006)
-
Rafał Górski,
Anna Płaza,
The proportion of components in field pea and spring triticale mixtures and harvest stage affect crude fiber content and forage digestibility
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 78 Nr 3 (2023)
-
Dorota Gawęda,
Piotr Andrzej Kopcewicz,
Zachwaszczenie soi w zależności od odmiany i rozstawy rzędów w warunkach uprawy metodą ekologiczną i konwencjonalną
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 78 Nr 1 (2023)
-
KAROLINA DUDZIAK,
MAGDALENA SOZONIUK,
KRZYSZTOF KOWALCZYK,
MICHAŁ NOWAK,
Cisgeneza jako perspektywa dla hodowli roślin. Praca przeglądowa
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 74 Nr 2 (2019)
-
JOANNA SENDER,
MARCIN BORKOWSKI,
Wąwozy lessowe w przestrzeni rolniczej wschodniej części Wyżyny Sandomierskiej
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 67 Nr 1 (2012)
-
MAREK NIEWĘGŁOWSKI,
MARIA SZCZYGIELSKA,
KRZYSZTOF KAPELA,
ANNA SIKORSKA,
EWA KRASNODĘBSKA,
KRYSTYNA ZARZECKA,
MAREK GUGAŁA,
Ekonomiczna ocena stosowania nawożenia azotem i biostymulatorów wzrostu w produkcji kukurydzy uprawianej na ziarno
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 75 Nr 4 (2020)
-
Tibor Filep,
Changes in DOC, DON content and DOC/DON ratio of acidic arenosol during two growing periods in pot experiments
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 59 Nr 4 (2004)
-
GRZEGORZ MIKICIUK,
MAŁGORZATA MIKICIUK,
Wpływ dolistnego nawożenia potasowo-krzemowego na wybrane cechy fizjologiczne truskawki (Fragaria ananassa Duch.) odmiany Elvira
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 64 Nr 4 (2009)
-
JAN BUCZEK,
WACŁAW JARECKI,
DOROTA BOBRECKA-JAMRO,
Wpływ przedplonów i dawek herbicydów na plon oraz zachwaszczenie pszenicy ozimej
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 68 Nr 2 (2013)
-
ANNA WÓJCIKOWSKA-KAPUSTA,
HUBERT KAMIŃSKI,
Indeks troficzności gleb o zróżnicowanym wieku zalesienia
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 75 Nr 3 (2020)
<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >>
Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.