Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Agronomy Science Baner text

Vol. 76 No. 2 (2021)

Articles

Effect of herbicides and herbicides with biostimulators on Rhizoctonia solani potato tuber infection

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2021.2.6
Submitted: May 19, 2021
Published: 2021-07-21

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the infestation of Rhizoctonia solani potato tubers depending on the herbicides and herbicides with biostimulants used. In the experiment, two factors were examined: the first order factor were potato cultivars: Bartek, Gawin, Honorata, while the second order factor was five ways of using herbicides and herbicides with biostimulators: control object - mechanical care, Harrier 295 ZC (linuron + clomazone), Harrier 295 ZC and Kelpak SL (linuron + clomazone and extract from algae), Sencor 70 WG (metribuzin) and Sencor 70 WG and Asahi SL (metribuzin and sodium p-nitrophenole, sodium o-nitrophenole, sodium 5-nitroguolacolate). The assessment of tuber rhizoctoniosis from individual experimental objects was performed using a 9-point scale. The herbicides and herbicides with biostimulators used in potato cultivation reduced the occurrence of pox on tubers and the average degree of infection of the sample and the average degree of infection of infected tubers.

References

  1. Atkinson D., Thornton M.K., Miller J.S., 2010. Development of Rhizoctonia solani on stems, stolons and tubers of potatoes. I. Effect of inoculum source. Am. J. Potato Res. 87, 374–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-010-9143-6
  2. Bulgari R., Franzoni G., Ferrante A., 2019. Biostimulants application in horticultural crops under abiotic stress conditions. Agronomy 9, 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9060306
  3. Cwalina-Ambroziak B., Bogucka B., 2012. Pathogens of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuber (Phytophtora infestans) occurring in treatments with foliar fertilization. Acta Agrobot. 65(3), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.5586/AA.2012.010
  4. Drobek M., Frąc M., Cybulska J., 2019. Plant biostimulants: importance of the quality and yield of horticultural crops and the improvement of plant tolerance to abiotic stress – a review. Agronomy 9(6), 335, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9060335
  5. Dzwonkowski W., Szczepaniak I., Zdziarska T., 2019. Popyt na ziemniaki. Rynek Ziemn. 46.
  6. Farouk S., 2015. Imroving growth and productivity of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) by some biostimulants and lithovit with or without boron. J. Plant Prod. Mansoura Univ. 6(12), 2187–2206. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/jpp.2015.52463
  7. Głosek-Sobieraj M., Cwalina-Ambroziak B., Hamouz K., 2018. The effect of growth regulators and a biostimulator on the health status, yield and yield components of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). Gesunde Pflanzen 70, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-017-0407-7
  8. Gugała M., Zarzecka K., Sikorska A., Dołęga H., 2018. Occurrence of defects of potato in conditions of application of herbicides and biostimulants. Acta Sci. Pol., Agric. 17(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.37660/aspagr
  9. Jeske M., Pańka D., Wichrowska D., 2015. Wpływ ochrony chemicznej, nawożenia organicznego oraz użyźniacza glebowego UGmax na zdrowotność bulw ziemniaka. Prog. Plant Prot. 55(1), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.14199/ppp-2015-016
  10. Krzysztofik B., 2008. Wpływ miejsca przechowywania na zmiany cech jakościowych bulw ziemniaka. Acta Agroph. 11(2), 449–456.
  11. Liu K., McInroy J.A., Hu C.H., Kloepper J.W., 2018. Mixtures of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance biological control of multiple plant diseases and plant-growth promotion in the presence of pathogens. Plant Dis. 102(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-17-0478-RE
  12. Lutomirska B., 2007. Wpływ odmiany i czynników meteorologicznych okresu wegetacji na ospowatość bulw ziemniaka. Prog. Plant Prot./Post. Ochr. Roś. 47(2), 173–177.
  13. Lutomirska B., Jankowska J., 2013. Ospowatość bulw zaawansowanych materiałów hodowlanych ziemniaka. Prog. Plant Prot./Post. Ochr. Roś. 53(4), 789–795. https://doi.org/10.14199/ppp-2013-026
  14. Lutomirska B., Jankowska J., 2014. Oddziaływanie czynników meteorologicznych na występowanie ospowatości bulw ziemniaka. Biul. Inst. Hod. Aklim. Rośl. 273, 119–128.
  15. Osowski J., Bernat E., 2010. Wpływ terminów zaprawiania i krojenia bulw na tempo wschodów i porażenie roślin rizoktoniozą ziemniaka. Prog. Plant Prot./Post. Ochr. Roś. 50(2), 687–694.
  16. Pszczółkowski P., Sawicka B., 2018. The effect of application of biopreparations and fungicides on the yield and selected parameters of seed value of seed potatoes. Acta Agroph. 25(2), 239–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.31545/aagr/93104
  17. Radtke W., Rieckmann W., Brendler F., 2000. Kartoffel: Krankheiten – Schadlinge Unkräuter. Th. Mann, Gelsenkirchen Buer, ss. 272.
  18. Roztropowicz S., Czerko Z., Głuska M., Goliszewski W., Gruczek T., Lis B., Lutomirska B., Nowacki W., Wierzejska-Bujakowska A., Zarzyńska K., Zgórska K., 1999. Metodyka obserwacji, pomiarów i pobierania prób w agrotechnicznych doświadczeniach z ziemniakiem. Praca zbiorowa. Wyd. Inst. Hod. Aklim. Rośl., Radzików, 1–50.
  19. Van Osten M.J., Pepe O., De Pascale S., Siletti S., Maggio A., 2017. The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 4, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-017-0089-5
  20. Shi W., Li M., Wei G., Tian R., Li C., Wang B., Lin R., Shi Ch., Chi X., Zhou B., 2019. The occurrence of potato common scab correlates with the community composition and function of the geocaulosphere soil microbiome. Microbiome 7, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0629-2
  21. Skowera B., Kopcińska J., Kopeć B., 2014. Changes in thermal and precipitation conditions in Poland in 1971–2010. Ann. Warsaw Univ. Life Sci. SGGW, Land Reclam., 46(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.2478/sggw-2014–0013
  22. Zarzyńska K., Pietraszko M., Barbaś P., 2020. Występowanie parcha zwykłego i ospowatości bulw w wybranych odmianach ziemniaka uprawianego w systemie ekologicznym i konwencjonalnym. Prog. Plant Prot./Post. Ochr. Roś. 60(4), 343–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.14199/ppp-2020-038

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.