Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Agronomy Science Baner text

Vol. 79 No. 1 (2024)

Articles

The effect of different row spacing and sowing amount on the development and yielding of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Part II. Yields and chemical composition of seeds and harvest residues

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2024.5260
Submitted: August 22, 2023
Published: 2024-08-07

Abstract

In 2015–2017, in the proving grounds of the Institute of Agroecology and Plant Production of Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, field studies were carried out on the different row spacing and sowing amount on the yielding and chemical content of soybean. The test included the assessment of the impact of the varied spacing of rows (15 cm, 30 cm) and the number of sown seeds (50, 75, 90) per unit area. In both of test, the “split-plot” method was used, four repetitions, with two variable factors. The seed yield and post-harvest residues were strongly dependent on the course of weather in particular years of field experiments. The factor of differentiated row spacing (15 cm, 30 cm) did not determine the yields of seeds and harvest residues and the yields of crude fat and total protein per hectare. No significant effect of differentiated row spacing and the number of sown seeds per 1 m2 on the chemical composition of soybean seeds was noted, except for the content of crude fat.

References

  1. Assefa Y., Purcell L.C., Salmeron M., Naeve S., Casteel S.N., Kovács P., Archontoulis S., Licht M., Below F., Kandel H., Lindsey L.E., Gaska J., Conley S., Shapiro C., Orlowski J.M., Gol-den B.R., Kaur G., Singh M., Thelen K., Laurenz R., Davidson D., Ciampitti I.A., 2019. As-sessing variation in US soybean seed composition (protein and oil). Front. Plant Sci. 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00298
  2. Balcom K.S., Price A.J., Van Santen E., Delaney D.P., Boykin D.L., Arriaga F.J., Bergtold J.S., Kornecki T.S., Raper R.L., 2010. Row spacing, tillage system, and herbicide technology affects plant growth yield. Field Crops Res. 117 (2–3), 219–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.03.003
  3. Bartkowiak A., 1978. Analiza wariancji dla układów ortogonalnych. Program AWA. W: Opis mery-toryczny programów statystycznych opracowanych w Instytucie Informatyki Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, 43–60.
  4. Batista R.O., Hamawaki R.L., Sousa L.B., Nogueira A.P.O., Hamawaki O.T., 2015. Adaptability and stability of soybean genotypes in off-season cultivation. Gen. Mol. Res. 14(3), 9633–9645. https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.August.14.26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.August.14.26
  5. Beatty K.D., Eldridge I.L., Simpson A.M. Jr., 1982. Soybean response to different planting patterns and dates. Agron. J. 74, 859–862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1982.00021962007400050021x
  6. Bellaloui H., Bruns H.A., Abbas H.K, Mengistu A., Fisher D.K., Reddy N.K., 2015. Effects of row-type, row-spacing, seeding rate, soil-type, and cultivar differences on soybean seed nutri-tion under us Mississippi Delta conditions. PLoS ONE 10, 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129913
  7. Biel W., Gawęda D., Jaroszewska A., Hury G., 2018. Content of minerals in soybean seeds as influenced by farming system, variety and row spacing. J. Elementol. 23(3), 863–873. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2017.22.3.1483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2017.22.3.1483
  8. Bita C.E., Gerats T., 2013. Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops. Front. Plant Sci. 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00273
  9. Board J.E., Kahlon C.S., 2013. Morphological responses to low plant population differ between soybean genotypes. Crop Sci. 53, 1109–1119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2012.04.0255
  10. Bobrecka-Jamro D., Pałka M., Sierpińska W., 1995. Wpływ gęstości siewu i przedplonów na cechy morfologiczne nowych odmian soi. Zesz. Nauk. Akad. Rol. Krak., Rol. 32, 5–17.
  11. Boydak E., Alpaslan M., Hayta M., Gerçek S., Simsek M., 2002. Seed composition of soybeans grown in the Harran region of Turkey as affected by row spacing and irrigation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50(16), 4718–4720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0255331
  12. Bury M., Nawracała J., 2004. Wstępna ocena potencjału plonowania odmian soi (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) uprawianych w rejonie Szczecina. Rośl. Oleiste 25, 415–422.
  13. Clawson E.L., Cothren J.T., Blouin D.C., 2006. Nitrogen fertilization and yield of cotton in ultra-narrow and conventional row spacing. Agron. J. 98, 72–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0033
  14. Cox W.J., Orlowski J., Ditommaso A., Knoblauch W., 2012. Planting soybean with a grain drill inconsistently increases yield and profit. Agron. J. 104, 1065–1073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0109
  15. Dardanelli J.L., Balzarini M., Martínez M.J., Cuniberti M., Resnik S., Ramunda S.F., Herrero R., 2006. Soybean maturity groups, environments, and their interaction define mega‐environments for seed composition in Argentina. Crop Sci. 46(5), 1939–1947. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.12-0480 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.12-0480
  16. Dei H.K., 2011. Soybean as a feed ingredient for livestock and poultry, recent trends for enhancing the diversity and quality of soybean products. W: D. Krezhova, Recent trends for enhancing the diversity and quality of soybean products. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/17601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/17601
  17. Elandt R., 1964. Statystyka matematyczna w zastosowaniu do doświadczalnictwa rolniczego. PWN, Warszawa.
  18. Gniadzik-Zasańska M., Kozak M., Wondołowska-Grabowska A., 2024. Wpływ zróżnicowanej rozstawy rzędów i ilości wysiewu na rozwój i plonowanie soi (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Cz. I. Rozwój i cechy morfologiczne soi. Agron. Sci. 79(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2024.5259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2024.5259
  19. Harlioǧlu A.G., 2012. Effect of solvent extracted soybean meal and full-fat soya on the protein and amino acid digestibility and body amino acid composition in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Iran. J. Fish. Sci. 11(3), 504–517.
  20. Jasińska Z., Kotecki A., Malarz W., 1987. Wpływ rozstawy rzędów i ilości wysiewu na plonowanie soi na glebie brunatniej – średniej. Biul. Inst. Hod. Aklim. Rośl. 167, 117–124.
  21. Jost P.H., Cothern J.T., 2000. Growth and yield comparisons of cotton planted in conventional and ultra-narrow row spacings. Crop Sci. 40(2), 430–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.402430x
  22. Kołodziej J., Pisulewska E., 2000. Wpływ czynników meteorologicznych na plon nasion i tłuszczu oraz zawartość tłuszczu w nasionach dwóch odmian soi, Rośl. Oleiste 21, 759–773.
  23. Kozak M., Malarz W., Kotecki A., Černý I., Serafin-Andrzejewska M., 2008a. Wpływ zróżnicowa-nej ilości wysiewu i biostymulatora Asahi SL na skład chemiczny nasion i resztek pozbioro-wych soi uprawnej. Rośl. Oleiste 29, 217–230.
  24. Kozak M., Malarz W., Serafin-Andrzejewska M., Kotecki A., 2008b. The effects of sowing rate and Asahi SL biostimulator on soybean growth and yield. Biostimulators in modern agriculture – Field Crops, Warsaw, 77–84.
  25. Kozak M., Malarz W., Serafin–Andrzejewska M., Kotecki A., 2008c. The effects of different sow-ing rate and Asahi SL treatments on soybean seed sowing value. Biostimulators in modern agri-culture – Field Crops, Warsaw, 85–91.
  26. Michałek S., Borowski E., 2006. Plonowanie oraz zawartość tłuszczu, kwasów tłuszczowych i białka w nasionach krajowych odmian soi w warunkach suszy. Acta Agrophys. 8(2), 459–471.
  27. Nowak A., Wróbel J., 2010. Wpływ wybranych regulatorów wzrostu na plonowanie soi (Glycine Max L. Merr) w warunkach kontrolowanego uwilgotnienia podłoża. Rośl. Oleiste 31(1), 125–132.
  28. Oplinger E.S., Philbrook B.D., 1992. Soybean plantin g date, row width, and seeding rate response in three tillage systems. J. Prod. Agric. 5, 94–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1992.0094
  29. Pasternakiewicz A., Dżugan M., 2009. Ocena zawartości podstawowych makroskładników w nasionach soi. Zesz. Nauk. – Płd.-Wschod. Oddz. Tow. Inż. Ekol. Siedzibą Rzesz. 1, 217–222.
  30. Pyzik J., 1982. Wpływ warunków przyrodniczych i czynników agrotechnicznych na plon i skład chemiczny nasion oraz niektóre cechy morfologiczne nowych form soi. Zesz. Nauk. Akad. Rol. Krak., Rozpr. Habilit. 87, 1–33.
  31. Pyzik J., Bobrecka-Jamro D., Rząsa B., 1987. Wpływ gęstości siewu na cechy morfologiczne wcze-snych odmian i rodów soi w południowo-wschodnim rejonie Polski. Biul. Inst. Hod. Aklim. Rośl. 164, 71–82.
  32. Rahman M., Hossain M., Anwar P., Juraimi A.S., 2011. Plant density influence on yield and nutri-tional quality of soybean seed. Asian J. Plant Sci. 10(2), 125–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2011.125.132
  33. Rodríguez M., Canales E., Borroto C.J., Carmona E, López J., Pujol M., Borrás-Hidalgo O., 2006. Identification of genes induced upon water-deficit stress in a drought-tolerant rice cultivar. J. Plant Physiol. 163(5), 577–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2005.07.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2005.07.005
  34. Salon C., Avice J.C., Larmure A., Ourry A., Prudent M., Voisin A.S., 2011. Plant N fluxes and modulation by nitrogen, heat and water stresses. A review based on comparison of legumes and non legume plants. W: A. Shanker, B. Venkateswarlu (red.), Abiotic stress in plants – mecha-nisms and adaptations. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/23474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/23474
  35. Skoufos I., 2014. Alternative protein sources to soybean meal in pig diets. J. Food Agric. Environ. 12, 655–666.
  36. Szwejkowska B., 2005. Wpływ intensywności uprawy grochu siewnego na zawartość i plon białka, Acta Sci. Pol., Agric. 4(1), 153–161.
  37. Szyrmer J., 1969. Vlijanie srokov siewa na urożajnost i chimiczeskij sostav semjon raźnych sortov soi. Izv. Timir. Seichoz. Akadem, 5, Moskwa, 73–79.
  38. Szyrmer J., 1971. Wpływ niektórych czynników środowiska i agrotechniki, na plon nasion soi oraz zawartość tłuszczu i jego jakość. Zesz. Nauk. Szk. Gł. Gosp. Wiej. Warsz., Rozpr. Nauk. 15, 99.
  39. Taylor H.M., Mason W.K., Bennie A.T.P., Rowse H.R., 1982. Responses of soybeans to two row spacings and two soil water levels. I. An analysis of biomass accumulation, canopy develop-ment. Solar radiation, interception and components of seed yield. Field Crop Res. 5, 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(82)90002-8
  40. Van Eys J., Offner A., Bach A., 2005. Manual of quality analyses for soybean products in the feed industry, USA. Am. Soybean Assoc. St. Louis, MO, 18, 47.
  41. Vargas R.L. de, Schuch L.O.B., Barros W.S., Tiago P., 2018. Macronutrients and micronutrients variability in soybean seeds. J. Agric. Sci. 10(4), 209. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v10n4p209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v10n4p209
  42. Weber C.R., Shibles R.M., Byth D.F., 1966. Effect of plant population and row spacing on soybean development and production. Agron. J. 58, 99–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1966.00021962005800010034x
  43. Worku M., Astatkie T., 2011. Row and plant spacing effects on yield and yield components of soy-bean cultivar under hot humid tropical environment of Ethiopia. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 197, 67–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00441.x
  44. Zanon A.J., Streck N.A., Grassini P., 2016. Climate and management factors influence soybean yield potential in a subtropical environment. Agron. J. 108(4), 1447–1454. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2015.0535 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2015.0535

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.