Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 16 No. 4 (2017)

Articles

VINE GROWTH AND YIELD RESPONSE OF ALPHONSE LAVALLÉE (V. vinifera L.) GRAPEVINES TO PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA UNDER ALKALINE CONDITION IN SOILLESS CULTURE

Submitted: October 20, 2020
Published: 2017-08-31

Abstract

High carbonate content in soil negatively affect plant growth, because the availability of nutrients is restricted due to high pH. The present investigations were carried out to reveal possible alleviating effects of the exogenous root inoculation PGPRs on development and physiology of soilless-grown grapevines cultivated
under alkaline stress in controlled glass house. pH of growth medium was increased from 7.5 to the values ranging from 7.9 (control) to 8.1 (A18) according to the bacterial inoculations by NaHCO3 supplementations. Bacteria inoculations did not result in statistically significant differences in pH values of growth media. The bacterial population density found in the rhizosphere of grapevines ranged from 6 × 108 CFU mL−1 (M-3) to 9 × 108 CFU mL−1 (Ca-637). The highest value of shoot thickness was obtained from Ca-637 (5.3 mm), followed by A18 (5.2 mm), while M3 did not significantly affected the shoot thickness. The greatest pruning residue per vine was obtained from A18 treatment (81.5 g), followed by Ca-637 (80.8 g) while the lowest value was determined in control. Vine yield was the greatest with A18 (1128 g) treatment and was followed by Ca 637 (1059 g). Considering the general observations, root inoculation of PGPRs A18 and Ca-637 may be recommended in enhancing bioremediation of alkali growth media.

References

Ali, B. (2015). Bacterial auxin signaling: comparative study of growth induction in Arabidopsis thaliana and Triticum aestivum. Turk. J. Bot., 39, 1–9.
Arshad, M., Shaharoona, B., Mahmood, T. (2008). Inoculation with Pseudomonas spp. containing ACC-deaminase partially eliminates the effects of drought stress on growth, yield and ripening of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Pedosphere, 18, 611–620.
Barka, E.A., Nowak, J., Clement, C. (2006). Enhancement of chilling resistance of inoculated grapevine plantlets with a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 72, 7246–7252.
Bashan, Y., Holguin, G., de-Bashan, L.E. (2004). Azospirillum plant relationships: Physiological, molecular, agricultural, and environmental advances (1997–2003). Can. J. Microbiol., 50, 521–577.
Bates, T.R., Dunst, R.M., Taft, T., Vercant, M. (2002). The vegetative response of ‘Concord’ grapevines to soil pH. HortScience, 37, 890–893.
Bates, T.R., Wolf, T.K. (2008). Nutrient management. In: Wine Grape Production Guide for Eastern North Amer-ica, Wolf, T.K. (ed.). Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service (NRAES), Cooperative Ex-tension, Ithaca, New York, 141–168.
Bavaresco, L., Poni, S. (2003). Effect of calcareous soil on photosynthesis rate, mineral nutrition and source-sink ratio of table grape. J. Plant Nutr., 26, 1451–1465.
Belimov, A.A., Dodd, I.C., Hontzeas, N., Theobald, J.C., Safronova, V.I., Davies, W.J. (2009). Rhizosphere bac-teria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase increase yield of plants grown in drying soil via both local and systemic hormone signalling. New Phytol., 181, 413–423.
Chakraborty, U., Chakraborty, B., Basnet, M. (2006). Plant growth promotion and induction of resistance in Ca-mellia sinensis by Bacillus megaterium. J. Basic Mi-crobiol., 46, 186–195.
Compant, S., van der Heijden, M.G.A., Sessitsch, A. (2010). Climate change effects on beneficial plant-microorganism interactions. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 73, 197–214.
Creus, C.M., Sueldo, R.J., Barassi, C.A. (2004). Water relations and yield in Azospirillum-inoculated wheat exposed to drought in the field. Canad. J. Bot., 82, 273–281.
Dilek, M., Sabir, A. (2016). Responde of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) levaes to different leaf fertilizers under a semiarid condition. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 15, 145–155.
Dimkpa, C., Weinand, T., Asch, F. (2009). Plant–rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions. Plant, Cell Environ., 32, 1682–1694.
Hardoim, P.R., van Overbeek, L.S., van Elsas, J.D. (2008). Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol. 16, 463–471.
Ipek, M., Pirlak, L., Esitken, A., Donmez, F., Turan, M., Sahin, F. (2014). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) increase yield, growth and nutrition of strawberry under high-calcareous soil conditions. J. Plant Nutr., 37, 990–1001.
Karakurt, H., Aslantas, R. (2010). Effects of some plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains on plant growth and leaf nutrient content of apple. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res., 18, 101–110.
Karlidag, H., Esitken, A., Yildirim, E., Donmez, M.F., Turan, M. (2011). Effects of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) on yield. Growth, leaf water content, membrane permeability and ionic composition of strawberry under saline conditions. J. Plant Nutr., 34, 34–45.
Kassa, A. (2015). Lime-induced iron chlorosis in fruit trees. J. Chemistry Chem. Sci., 5, 293–302.
Nadeem, S.M., Zahir, Z.A., Naveed, M., Arshad, M. (2007). Preliminary investigations on inducing salt tolerance in maize through inoculation with rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminase activity. Canad. J. Micro-biol., 53, 1141–1149.
Richards, L.A. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. USDA Agric. Handbook 60. Washington, D.C.
Rolli, E., Marasco, R., Saderi, S., Corretto, E., Mapelli, F., Cherif, A., Borin, S., Valenti, L., Sorlini, C., Daffonchio, D. (2017). Root-associated bacteria promote grapevine growth: from the laboratory to the field. Plant Soil, 410, 369–382. Rousk, J., Baath, E., Brookes, P.C., Lauber, C.L., Lozupone, C., Caporaso, J.G., Knight, R., Fierer, N. (2010). Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J., 4, 134–151.
Sabir, A. (2013). Improvement of grafting efficiency in hard grafting grape Berlandieri hybrid rootstocks by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Sci. Hortic., 164, 24–29.
Sabir, A., Bilir-Ekbic, H., Erdem, H., Tangolar, S. (2010). Response of four grapevine (Vitis spp.) genotypes to direct or bicarbonate-induced iron deficiency. Span. J. Agric. Res., 8, 823–829.
Sabir, A., Yazici, M.A., Kara, Z., Sahin, F. (2012). Growth and mineral acquisition response of grapevine root-stocks (Vitis spp.) to inoculation with different strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). J. Sci. Food Agric., 92, 2148–2153.
Saleem, M., Arshad, M., Hussain, S., Bhatti, A.S. (2007). Perspective of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) containing ACC deaminase in stress agriculture. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotech., 34, 635–648.
Sánchez-Rodríguez, A.R., del Campillo, M.C., Torrent, J., Jones, D.L. (2014). Organic acids alleviate iron chlorosis in chickpea grown on two p-fertilized soils. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 14, 292–303.
Shakeri, E., Modarres-Sanavy, S.A.M., Dehaghi, M.A., Tabatabaei, S.A., Moradi-Ghahderijani, M. (2016). Im-provement of yield, yield components and oil quality in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) by N-fixing bacteria fertilizers and urea. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 62, 547–560.
Xue, Q.Y., Chen, Y., Li, S.M., Chen, L.F., Ding, G.C., Guo, D.W., Guo, J.H. (2009). Evaluation of the strains of Acinetobacter and Enterobacter as potential biocontrol agents against Ralstonia wilt of tomato. Biol. Con-trol, 48, 252–258.
Xun, F., Xie, B., Liu, S., Guo, C. (2015). Effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPR) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation on oats in salinealkali soil contaminated by petroleum to enhance phytoremediation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 22, 598–608.
Winkler, A.J., Cook, J.A., Kliewer, W.M., Lider, L.A. (1974). General Viticulture. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA, 710 pp.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.