Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 16 No. 4 (2017)

Articles

INVESTIGATING EFFECTS OF OVER-IRRIGATION AND DEFICIT IRRIGATION ON YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY IN PINK LADYTM ‘ROSY GLOW’ APPLE

Submitted: October 20, 2020
Published: 2017-08-31

Abstract

Fruit production has to be adapted to climate change that is often associated with heat and water deficit episodes. To develop efficient strategies on how to manage commercial orchards under deficit water supply, we need to know the effects of water-stress on crop production. However, when the water supply is abundant
apple growers often think that over-irrigation gives higher marketable fruit yield than potential evapotranspiration-based or sensor-based (e.g. tensiometer, dendrometer) irrigation. We therefore aimed to evaluate the effects of three water regimes, namely well-watered (100% of crop evapotranspiration – ETc, WW), 25% of ETc water deficit over the season (water-stressed, WS), and twofold of WW (200% of ETc, 2xWW), on midday stem water potential (SWP), crop yield and fruit quality of Pink LadyTM ‘Rosy Glow’ apples. As expected, SWP was lower in WS than in the others, but both WS and 2xWW decreased fruit yield, although 2xWW tended to increase yield in the >70% color class and ensured quite a constant amount of yield at each picking time. Soluble solid content (SSC) in fruit was higher in WS. As a whole, our results suggest that over-irrigation that is sometimes recommended to keep a safety margin should be considered with caution. Rather, a mild water-stress, between WS and WW in our experiment, may represent a good compromise for a good quality yield.

References

Allen, R.G., Pereira. L.S., Raes, D., Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and drainage paper no. 56. FAO, Rome, Italy.
Akhtar, I., Nazir, N. (2013). Effect of waterlogging and drought stress in plants. Intl. J. Water. Res. Environ. Sci., 2, 34–40.
Chai, Q., Gan, Y., Zhao, C., Xu, H.L., Waskom, R.M., Niu, Y., Siddique, K.H.M. (2015). Regulated deficit ir-rigation for crop production under drought stress. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 36, 1–21.
Crisosto, C.H., Mitchell, F.G., Johnson, S. (1995). Factors in fresh market stone fruit quality. Postharvest News Inf., 6, 17–21.
Jaleel, C.A., Manivannan, P., Wahid, A., Farooq, M., Al-Juburi, H.J., Somasundaram, R., Panneerselvam, R. (2009). Drought stress in plants: a review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 11, 100–105.
Jenkins, M. (2003). Prospects for biodiversity. Science, 302, 1175–1177.
Lauri, P.E., Willaume, M., Larrive, G., Lespinasse, J.M. (2004). The concept of centrifugal training in apple aimed at optimizing the relationship between growth and fruiting. Acta Hortic., 636, 35–42.
McCutchan, H., Shackel, K.A. (1992). Stem-water potential as a sensitive indicator of water stress in prune trees (Prunus domestica L. cv. French). J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 117, 607–611.
Naor, A. (2006). Irrigation scheduling and evaluation of tree water status in deciduous orchards. Hortic. Rev., 32, 111–116.
Naor, A., Naschitz, S., Peres, M., Gal, Y. (2008). Response of apple fruit size to tree water status and crop load. Tree Physiol., 28, 1255–1261.
Sadras, V.O., Trentacoste, E.R., Meinzer, F. (2011). Phenotypic plasticity of stem water potential correlates with crop load in horticultural trees. Tree Physiol., 31, 494–499.
Stewart, W.L., Fulton, A.E., Krueger, W.H., Lampinen, B.D., Shackel, K.A. (2011). Regulated deficit irrigation reduces water use of almonds without affecting yield. Calif. Agric., 65, 90–95.
Sun, O.J., Sweet, G.B., Whitehead, D., Graeme, D. (1995). Physiological responses to water stress and waterlogging in Nothofagus species. Tree Physiol., 15, 629–638.
Yordanov, I., Velikova, V., Tsonev, T. (2000). Plant responses to drought, acclimation, and stress tolerance. Photosynthetica, 38, 171–186.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.