Abstract
The study focused on characterizing the three German plum cultivars (‘Jojo’, ‘Hanita’ and ‘Katinka’) hypersensitive (oversensitiveness) and/or tolerant to Sharka to acknowledge the tree vigour, precocity, yield performances and main physico-chemical quality attributes of the fruits grown in a Serbian agro-climatic conditions. The cultivars were grafted on ‘Wangenheim Prune’ seedlings rootstock and established at a 4 × 1.5 m. The following determinations were assessed: trunk cross sectional area, yield per tree and unit area, yield efficiency, fruit and stone mass, fruit linear dimensions, flesh rate, geometric mean diameter, sphericity, aspect ratio, surface area, soluble solids and sugars content, titratable acidity, and ratio between them, respectively. The cultivar per se (genotype) behaved as the most influencing factor conditioning plum tree vigour, yield characteristics, physical attributes, soluble solids content, titratable acidity and sugar profiles.
The assessment of plum chemical compositions implies the great potential of German cultivars for fresh market, fruit processing and drying. In fact, the ‘Katinka’ seems particularly suitable for fresh consumption, whereas ‘Jojo’ and ‘Hanita’ can be recommended for fresh consumption, processing and drying. Finally, all three cultivars grafted on ‘Wangenheim Prune’ seedlings can be recommended for growers in similar conditions.
References
Blažek J., Pištĕkova I., 2009. Preliminary evaluation results of new plum cultivars in a dense planting. Hortic. Sci. 36(2), 45–54.
Blažek J., Vávra R., Pištĕkova I., 2004. Orchard performance of new plum cultivars on two rootstocks in a trial at Holovousy in 1998–2003. Hortic. Sci. 31(2), 37–43.
Çalışır, S., Hacıseferoĝulları, H., Özcan, M., Arslan, D., 2005. Some nutritional and technological properties of wild plum (Prunus spp.) fruits in Turkey. J. Food Eng. 66(2): 233–237.
Crisosto C.H., Garner D., Crisosto G.M., Bowerman E., 2004. Increasing ‘Blackamber’ plum (Prunus salicina Lindley) consumer acceptance. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 34(3), 237–244.
FAOSTAT, 2012. FAO Statistics Division, February 29, 2012. Available from http://faostat.fao.org.
Forni E., Erba M.L., Maestrelli A., Polesello A., 1992. Sorbitol and free sugar contents in plums. Food Chem. 44(4), 269–275.
Grzyb Z.S., Sitarek M., 2007. Preliminary results on the influence of seedling and clonal rootstocks on tree growth and yield of two plum cultivars. Acta Hort. 732, 267–271.
Halapija-Kazija D., Jelačić T., Vujević P., 2009. Introduction of table plum varieties – preliminary results. In: 44th Croatian and 4th International Symposium of Agriculture, February 16–20, 2009, Opatija, Croatia. Proceedings, 827–831.
Hartmann W., Neumüller M., 2006. Breeding for resistance: breeding for Plum pox virus resistant plums (Prunus domestica L.) in Germany. EPPO Bull. 36(2), 332–336.
Jacob H.B., 2007. Twenty-five years plum breeding in Geisenheim, Germany: Breeding targets and previous realisations. Acta Hortic. 734, 341–346.
Jannatizadeh A., Naderi-Boldaji M., Fatahi R., Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti M., Tabatabaeefar A., 2008. Some postharvest physical properties of Iranian apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) fruit. Int. Agrophys. 22(2), 125–131.
Klewicki R., Uczciwek M., 2008. Effect of osmotic dehydration in fructose, sucrose and fructooligosaccharide solution on the content of saccharides in plums and apples and their energy value. Agr. Food Sci. 17(4), 367–375.
Kosina J. (2004). Orchard performance of two plum cultivars on some clonal rootstocks. Hortic. Sci. 31(3), 93–95.
Kumar J., Rana S.S., Verma H.S., Parmar D.K., 2001. Long-term effects of intercrops on growth, yield and fruit quality of plum (Prunus salicina). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 71(11), 687–690.
Maduako J.N., Faborode M.O., 1990. Some physical properties of cocoa pods in relation to primary processing. IFE J. Technol. 2(1), 1–7.
Milošević, T., Petrović, S., 2000. State, problems and perspective of plum production in highland of central Serbia. In: 1st International Scientific Symposium, “Plum Days” – Production, processing and marketing of plum and plum products, Semptember 9–11, Koštunići, Serbia, 143–154. [in Serbian]
Milosevic T., Milosevic N., Mratinic E., 2010a. Morphogenic variability of some autochthonous plum cultivars in Western Serbia. Braz. Arch. Biol. Techn. 53(6), 1293–1297.
Milosevic M.T., Glisic P.I., Milosevic T.N., Glisic S.I., 2010b. Plum pox virus as a stres factor in the vegetative growth, fruit growth and yield of plum (Prunus domestica) cv. ‘Cacanska Rodna’. Europ. J. Plant Pat. 126(1), 73–79.
Milošević T., Milošević N., 2011a. New plum hybrids resistant to Plum pox virus from the Cacak breeding program (Serbia). Compt. rend. Acad. bulg. Sci. 64(8), 1213–1220.
Milošević T., Milošević N., 2011b. Quantitative analysis of the main biological and fruit quality traits of F1 plum gonotypes (Prunus domestica L.). Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 10(2), 95–107.
Milošević T., Milošević N., 2012. Phenotypic diversity of autochthonous European (Prunus domestica L.) and Damson (Prunus insititia L.) plum accessions based on multivariate analysis. Hortic. Sci. 39(1), 8–20.
Mohsenin N.N., 1986. Physical properties of plant and animal materials. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, USA, 80–85.
Nergiz C., Yldz H., 1997. Research on chemical composition of some varieties of European plums (Prunus domestica) adapted to the Aegean district of Turkey. J. Agric. Food Chem. 45(8), 2820–2823.
Ruiz D., Egea J., 2008. Phenotypic diversity and relationships of fruit quality traits in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) germplasm. Euphytica 163(1), 143–158.
Schneider F., 1979. Sugar Analysis. Official and Tentative Methods Recommended by the International Commission for Uniform Methods of Sugar Analysis. ICUMSA, Peterborough, 41–73.
Sosna I., 2010. Effect of pruning time on yielding and fruit quality of several early ripening plum cultivars. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 9(1), 37–44.
Sosna I., 2012. Effect of hand and chemical thinning on yielding and fruit quality of two lateripening plum cultivars. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 11(2), 41–51.
Stefanova B., Dinkova H., Dragoyski K., 2008. Plum cultivar Hanita in the Troyan conditions. Universitatea din Craiova, Seria: Biologie, Horticultură, Tehnologia prelucrării produselor agricole, Ingineria mediului, 13: 165–168.
Walkowiak-Tomczak D., Reguła J., Łysiak G., 2007. Physico-chemical properties and antioxidant activity of selected plum cultivars fruit. Acta Sci. Pol., Technologia Alimentaria 7(4), 15–22.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
