THE GRAFTING SUCCESS OF FOURTEEN GENOTYPES GRAFTED ON THREE DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS ON PRODUCTION OF SWEET CHERRY (Prunus avium L.) SAPLING
Hamdi Zenginbal
Abant Izzet Baysal University, Vocational Community College of Bolu, 14100 Bolu, TurkeyTaki Demir
Sakarya University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Food Engineering, 54187 Sakarya, TurkeyHüsnü Demirsoy
Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, 55139 Samsun, TurkeyÖmer Beyhan
Sakarya University, Vocational Community College of Pamukova, 54900 Sakarya, TurkeyAbstract
This study was conducted in Çanakkale Province, Bayramiç County between 2011 and 2013. The aim of this study was to determine the best rootstock × genotype combination by grafting 14 standard and local sweet cherry genotypes cultivated in Amasya Province on Mazzard, Gisela 5 and Gisela 6 rootstocks with T-budding method. Graftings were conducted on August 15th in both years. Following the grafting, the average daily temperature and relative humidity values in addition to bud sprout ratios and graft shoot lengths and diameters were examined. The experiment location was suitable for fall T-budding based on obtained climate data. The results of research showed that cherry genotypes and rootstocks had significant effects on bud sprout ratio. The best bud sprout rates among the sweet cherry genotypes and rootstocks were obtained from ‘Kargayüreği’ genotype (100%) and Gisela 6 rootstock (91.4 and 94.5%, respectively) in both year. Graft shoot lengths and diameters showed differences depending on genotypes and rootstocks. Among the sweet cherry genotypes and rootstocks, the best graft shoot length were obtained from ’Kargayüreği’ genotype and Gisela 5 rootstock in both year. The highest graft shoot diameter values among the sweet cherry genotypes and rootstocks were obtained from ‘Bing’ genotype and Gisela 5 rootstock in both years. As a result, it was shown that the 14 sweet cherry genotypes cultivated in Amasya can be successfully grafted on Mazzard, Gisela 5 and Gisela 6 cherry rootstocks and that 1st and 2nd class sweet cherry saplings can be produced.
Keywords:
Prunus avium, sweet cherry, rootstock, budding, grafting successReferences
Barritt, B.H. (1992). Intensive orchard management. Good fruit grower. Yakima, Washington, 211 p. Betrán, J.A., Val, J., Montañés Millán, L., Monge, E., Mon-tañés, L., Moreno, M.A. (1997). Influence of rootstock on the mineral concentrations of flowers and leaves from sweet cherry. Acta Hort., 448, 163–167.
Charlot, G., Edin, M., Floc’hlay, F., Soing, P., Boland, C. (2005). Tabel® Edabriz: A dwarf rootstock for intensive cherry orchards . Acta Hort., 667, 217–221.
Çelik, M. (1983). The Importance of rootstocks in fruit culti-vation and rootstock problem in fruit cultivation in Turkey. Ankara Univ. Agric. Fac. Publ., No 886, Ankara, 29 p.
Çelik, M., Sakin, M. (1991). The current situation of fruit arboriculture in Turkey. The First Turkish Arboriculture Symposium, October 26–28, 1987, Ankara, Turkey, 169–180 p.
Demirsoy, H., Demirsoy, L. (2000). Rootstocks used for some mild climate fruit types today. The Second National Ar-boriculture Symposium, September 25–29, 2000, Bademli, Turkey. Demirsoy, L., Demir, T., Demirsoy, H., Okumuş, A., Kaçar, Y.A. (2008). Identification of some sweet cherry cultivars grown in Amasya by RAPD markers. Acta Hort. (ISHS), 795,147–153.
Eriş, A., Barut, E. (2000). Mild climate fruits-I. Uludağ Univ. Fac. of Agric. Textbook No 6, Bursa, 226 p.
Eroğul, D. (2012). The use of rootstocks in cherry growing. J. Adnan Menderes Univ. Agric. Fac., 9(2), 19–24.
Facteau, T.J., Chesnut, N.E., Rowe, K.E. (1996). Tree fruit size and yield of ‘Bing’ sweet cherry as influenced by rootstock replant area and training system. Sci. Hortic., 67, 13–26.
Gonda, I., Kiraly, K., Holb, I.J. (2007). Examination of growth of cherry cultivars adapted to intensive production. Acta Hort., 732, 429–434.
Hartmann, H.T., Kester, D.E., Davies, Jr. F.T., Geneve, R.L. (2011). Plant propagation: principles and practices. 8th Edition. Regents/Prentice Hall International Ed., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 915 p.
Iezzoni, A, Schmidt, H., Albertini, A. (1990). Cherries (Prunus) in: Genetic resources of temperate fruits and nuts. Acta Hort., 290, 111–176. Jiménez, S., Garín, A., Albás, E.S., Betrán, J.A., Gogorcena, Y., Moreno, M.A. (2004 a). Effect of several rootstocks on the fruit quality of ‘Sunburst’ sweet cherry. Acta Hort., 658, 353–358.
Jiménez, S., Garín, A., Betrán, J.A., Gogorcena, Y., Moreno, M.A. (2004 b). Flower and foliar analysis for prognosis of sweet cherry nutrition: influence of different rootstocks. J. Plant Nutr., 27(4), 701–712.
Küden, A. (1998). The integrated fruit cultivation in Turkey scale. Training Course, Adana, 58 p. (unpublished).
Moghadam, E.G., Khalighi, A. (2007). Relationship between vigor of Iranian Prunus mahaleb L. selected dwarf rootstock and some morphological charecters. Sci. Hort., 111, 209–212. Moreno, M.A., Adrada, R., Aparicio, J., Betrán, J.A. (2001). Performance of ‘Sunburst’ sweet cherry grafted on differ-ent rootstocks. J. Hort. Sci. Biotech., 76(2), 167–173.
Neilsen, G., Kappel, F. (1996). ‘Bing’ sweet cherry leaf nutrition is affected by rootstock. Hortscience, 31(7), 1169–1172.
Öz, F. (1988). Sweet and sour cherry. Agricultural Research and Development Support Foundation Publ., No16, Yalo-va, Turkey, 27 p.
Özbek, S. (1989). General fruit cultivation. Çukurova Univ. Fac. of Agric. Textbook, No 31, Ankara, Turkey, 386 p.
Özçağiran, R., Ünal, A., Özeker, E., İsfendiyaroğlu, M. (2003). Mild climate fruit types, stone fruits, vol. 1. Ege Univ. Agric. Fac. Publ., No 553, Ege University Press, Izmir, Turkey, 229 p.
Ruisa, S., Rubauskis, E. (2004). Preliminary results of testing new sweet cherry rootstocks. Acta Hort., 658, 541–546.
Stachowiak, A., Świerczyński, A. (2009). The influence of mycorrhizal vaccine on the growth of maiden sweet cherry trees of selected cultivars in nursery. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 8(1), 3–11.
Świerczyński, S., Stachowiak, A. (2004). Usefulness of five sour cherry cultivars grafted on two different footstocks for commercial orchard. Roczn. AR w Poznaniu, 360(38), 169–174.
SPSS, IBM Corp. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. IBM Corp, Armonk, NY.
Trefois, R. (1985). Dwarfing rootstocks for sweet cherries. Acta Hort., 169, 147–155.
TSE. (1996). Turkish Standard. Fruit Saplings – Stone Fruits Turkish Standards Institution, TS 4217/January 1996. Turkish Standards Institution, Ankara. TSMS. (2014). Turkish State Meteorological Service. Official Statistics (Statistical Database of Çanakkale, Turkey).
TUIK. (2014). Prime Ministry Turkish Statistical Institute. Ankara.
Webster, A.D., Schmidt, H. (1996). Rootstocks for sweet and sour cherries. Cherries crop phsiology, production and us-es, CAB international, Wallingford, UK, 127–166 p.
Westwood, M.N. (1995). Temperate-zone pomology, physiology and culture. 3rd ed., Timber Pres, Oregon, 523 p.
Yilmaz, M. (1992). Horticultural crops growing techniques. Cukurova Univ. Publ., Adana, Turkey, 150 p.
Zenginbal, H. (2007). The effect of different grafting methods on success grafting in different kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa, A. chev) cultivars. Inter. J. Agric. Res., 2(8), 736–740.
Abant Izzet Baysal University, Vocational Community College of Bolu, 14100 Bolu, Turkey
Sakarya University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Food Engineering, 54187 Sakarya, Turkey
Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, 55139 Samsun, Turkey
Sakarya University, Vocational Community College of Pamukova, 54900 Sakarya, Turkey
License
Articles are made available under the conditions CC BY 4.0 (until 2020 under the conditions CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Submission of the paper implies that it has not been published previously, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
The author signs a statement of the originality of the work, the contribution of individuals, and source of funding.
