HORIZONTAL CANOPY FOR PLUMS MECHANICALLY HARVESTED IN CONTINUOUS MOTION
Augustyn Mika
Research Institute of Horticulture in SkierniewiceZbigniew Buler
Research Institute of Horticulture in SkierniewiceJacek Rabcewicz
Research Institute of Horticulture in SkierniewicePaweł Białkowski
Research Institute of Horticulture in SkierniewiceDorota Konopacka
Research Institute of Horticulture in SkierniewiceAbstract
Mechanical harvesting of plum fruit cuts drastically costs of production. ‘Elena’ plum trees were planted, at a high density (4 × 1.0 m and 4 × 1.5 m) and trained to
a horizontal canopy. The trees, trellised on wires 1 m above the ground, created a continuous, open-texture, fruit-bearing horizontal surface, 2 × 200 m long. Plum trees planted at the distance 4 × 1.5 m and 4 × 2.0 m trained to the standard leader tree served as the control. In the fifth to seventh year from planting (2012–2014), plums from the horizontal canopy were harvested with a tractor-driven, canopy-contact harvester. Fruits from the standard leader trees, having a height of 2.8 m, were harvested with a self-propelled canopy-contact straddle harvester. The mean volume of a horizontally trained tree was 3.6 m3, compared with 7.4 m3 of a standard leader tree. The efficiency of mechanical fruit harvesting of control trees was 40 times higher than of hand picking. The efficiency of fruit harvesting of horizontal canopy trees was 25 times higher than of hand harvesting. The effectiveness of fruit collecting of standard leader trees was 86–94% against horizontal canopies 72–80%. Plums harvested with the small tractor-driven harvester were of good quality. After grading, 80% of them were suitable for the fresh market. Plums harvested with the large straddle harvester were of medium quality. After grading only 50% of them were suitable as dessert fruits.
Keywords:
Prunus domestica, harvesting technology, fruit qualityReferences
Botu,M.,Mitra Amza,M., Botu, I., Papachatzis, A. (2013). European plum (Prunus domestica L.) cultural system trial. Acta Hort., 985, 169–173.
Brunner, T. (1990). Pruning with bending effect on the basis of inducing hypotonic ramification. Physiological fruit tree training for intensive culture. Akad. Kiado, Budapest, 81–97.
Castro-Garcia, S., Blanco Roldan, G.L., Jimenez-Jimenez, F., Gil-Ribes, J.A., Ferguson, L., Glozer, K., Krueger, W.H., Fichtner, E.J., Burns, J.K., Miles, J.A., Rosa, U.A. (2012). Preparing Spain and California table olive industries for mechanical harvesting. Acta Hort., 965, 29–40.
Chun, O.K., Kim, D.O., Moon, H.Y., Kang, H.G., Lee, C.Y. (2003). Contribution of individual polyphenolics to total antioxidant capacity of plums. J. Agric. Food Chem., 51(25), 7240–7245.
Czynczyk, A., Mika, A., Chlebowska, D. (1976). Progress report on 12 years of experimentation with established spur, renewal and regulated pruning of apple trees. Fruit Sci. Rep., 3(2), 25–28.
Day, K., Johnson, R.S., Dejong, T.M. (2013). Developing a pedestrian plum orchard: the role of tree form, density and height. Acta Hort., 985, 175–180.
Fanning, K.M., Netzel, G., Netzel, D., Edwards, T., Treloar, R., Stanley, D., Russell, B., Topp, B. (2012). Queen Garnet: story of high anthocyanin plum. 10 Int. Symp. Plum and Prune Genetics, Breeding and Pomology. May 20–25, University of California, Davis, 12.
Ferguson, L., Glozer, K., Crisosto, C., Rosa, U.A., Castro-Garcia, S., Fichtner, E.J., Guinard, J.X., Lee, S.M., Krueger, W.H., Miles, J.A., Burns, J.K. (2012). Improving canopy contact olive harvester efficiency with mechanical pruning. Acta Hort., 965, 83–87.
Hartmann, W., Neumuller, M. (2013). The next generation of European plum cultivars resistant to plum pox virus. Acta Hort., 985, 149–154.
McKenzie, D.W. (1971). The potential value of intensive and super-intensive orchards in New Zealand. Comp. Fruit Tree, 4(3), 27–39.
Mika, A., Buler, Z. (2011). Intensive plum orchard with summer training and pruning. Adv. Hortic. Sci., 25(3), 193–198.
Mika, A., Wawrzyńczak, P., Buler, Z., Krawiec, A., Białkowski, P., Michalska, B., Plaskota, M., Gotowicki, B. (2011). Results of experiments with densely – planted sour cherry trees for harvesting with continuously moving combine harvester. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res., 19(2), 31–40.
Mika, A., Wawrzyńczak, P., Buler, Z., Konopacka, D., Konopacki, P., Krawiec, A., Białkowski, P., Michalska, B., Plaskota, M., Gotowicki, B. (2012). Mechanical harvesting of plums for processing with a continuously moving combine harvester. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res., 20(1), 29–42.
Morales-Sillero, A., Rallo, P., Jimenez, M.R., Casanova, L., Suarez, M.P. (2014). Suitability of two table olive cultivars (‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’ and ‘Manzanilla Cacerena’) for mechanical harvesting in superhigh-density hedgerows. HortSci., 49(8), 1028–1033.
Mullins, M.G. (1965 a). The gravitational response of young apple trees. J. Hort. Sci., 40(3), 237–247.
Mullins, M.G. (1965 b). Lateral shoot growth in horizontal apple stems. Ann. Bot., Lond., 29, 73–78.
Rozpara, E., Grzyb, Z.S. (2007). Growth, yield and fruit quality of eighteen plum cultivars grafted on two rootstocks. Acta Hort., 734, 157–161.
Stacewicz-Sapuntzakis, M. (2013). Dried plums and their products: Composition and health effects-an updated review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 53(12), 1277–1302.
Stacewicz-Sapuntzakis, M., Bowen, P.E., Hussain, E.A., Damayanti-Wood, B.I., Farnsworth, N.R. (2001). Chemical composition and potential health effects of prunes: a functional food? Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 41(4), 251–86.
Wertheim, S.J. (1981). High-density planting: development and current achievements in the Netherlands, Belgium and West Germany. Acta Hort., 114, 318–323.
Wustenberghs, H., Keulemans, J. (1996). A comparison of 3 plum tree training systems during the first five years of growth. Acta Hort., 451, 625–631.
Research Institute of Horticulture in Skierniewice
Research Institute of Horticulture in Skierniewice
Research Institute of Horticulture in Skierniewice
Research Institute of Horticulture in Skierniewice
Research Institute of Horticulture in Skierniewice
License
Articles are made available under the conditions CC BY 4.0 (until 2020 under the conditions CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Submission of the paper implies that it has not been published previously, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
The author signs a statement of the originality of the work, the contribution of individuals, and source of funding.
