Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Agronomy Science Baner text

Vol. 78 No. 3 (2023)

Articles

Number of weeds and their species composition in the potato crop after the application of herbicide and biostimulants

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2023.5168
Submitted: May 8, 2023
Published: 22.01.2024

Abstract

The field research was carried out in 20188–2020, at the Agricultural Experimental Station in Zawady, belonging to the University of Natural Sciences and Humanities in Siedlce. The experiment was conducted in three repetitions, in a split-plot arrangement, on slightly acidic soil belonging to the very good rye complex. The study included two factors: the first (first order) – two varieties of edible potato: Oberon and Malaga. Both varieties are medium-early, with a leaf-stalk habit. The second factor (second order) – five methods of potato cultivation with the use of mechanical  treatments, herbicide, biostimulants and with the use of herbicide and biostimulants. The aim of the study was to examine the effect of herbicide and its combination with biostimulants on the species composition and number of weeds. Using the frame-weight method, the average number of weeds per 1 m2 and their species composition were determined. The herbicide Avatar 293 ZC and the biostimulants Agro-Sorb Folium and PlonoStart significantly reduced the density of weeds per
1 m2 at the two determination dates, compared to the control object. The application of Avatar 293 ZC herbicide and Agro-Sorb Folium biostimulant reduced to the greatest extent the occurrence of such weed species as: Echinochloa crus-galli, Chenopodium album L., Polygonum aviculare and Viola arvensis Murr. At the first date of weed evaluation, i.e. before the rows were short-circuited, a higher number of weeds was recorded than just before the potato tubers were harvested. Potato varieties had no significant effect on crop weed infestation.

References

  1. Andrejiová A., Adamec S., Hegedűsová A., Hegedűs O., Rosa R. 2023. Verification of the humic substances and PGPB biostimulants beneficial effects on the potato yield and bioactive substances content. Potravinarstvo Slovak J. Food Sci. 17, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5219/1805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5219/1805
  2. Baranowska A., Mystkowska I., Zarzecka K., Gugała M., 2016. Efficacy of herbicides in potato crop. J. Ecol. Eng. 17(1), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/61194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/61194
  3. Barbaś P., Sawicka B., 2020. Dependence of potato yield on weed infestation. Agron. Res. 18(2), 346–359. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.20.1222
  4. Domaradzki K., 2001. Metodyka doświadczeń biologicznej oceny herbicydów, bioregulatorów i adiuwantów. Cz. I. Doświadczenia polowe. Wyd. IUNG, Puławy.
  5. Dzieżyc H., Chmura K., Dmowski Z., 2012. Określenie wpływu warunków opadowych na plonowanie ziemniaka bardzo wczesnego i wczesnego w południowej Polsce. Woda, Śr., Obsz. Wiej. 12(2), 133–141.
  6. Gugała M., Zarzecka K., Dołęga H., Sikorska A., 2018. Weed infestation and yielding of potato under conditions of varied use of herbicides and bio-stimulants. J. Ecol. Eng. 19(4), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/89654 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/89654
  7. Haliniarz M., Chojnacka S., Rusecki H., Gawęda D., Łukasz J., 2018. The effect of combined use of herbicide and growth retardants as well as diversified mineral fertilization on weed infestation of spring wheat. Agron. Sci. 73(4), 111–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.24326/asx.2018.4.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asx.2018.4.10
  8. Kalbarczyk R., Kalbarczyk E., 2009. Potrzeby i niedobory opadów atmosferycznych w uprawie ziemniaka średnio późnego i późnego w Polsce. Infrastrukt. Ekol. Teren. Wiej. 3, 129–140.
  9. Kanatas P., Travlos I., Gazoulis I., Antonopoulos N., Tataridas A., Mpechliouli N., Petraki D., 2022. Biostimulants and herbicides: A promising approach towards green deal implementation. Agronomy 12(12), 3205. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123205
  10. Kołodziejczyk M., 2015. The effect of living mulches and conventional methods of weed control on weed infestation and potato yield. Sci Hortic. 191, 127–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.05.016
  11. IUSS Working Group WRB, 2022. World Reference Base for Soil Resources. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. 4th edition. International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS), Vienna, Austria.
  12. Matysiak K., Miziniak W., Kaczmarek S., Kierzek R., 2018. Herbicydy z naturalnymi i syntetycznymi biostymulatorami w pszenicy jarej. Ciênc. Rur. 48(11). https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20180405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20180405
  13. Mystkowska I., Zarzecka K., Baranowska A., Gugała M., 2017. Zachwaszczenie łanu i plonowanie ziemniaka w zależności od sposobu pielęgnacji i warunków pogodowych. Acta Agroph. 24(1), 111–121.
  14. Mystkowska I., Zarzecka K., Gugała M., Ginter A., 2023. Ocena ekonomiczna kontroli zachwaszczenia i odżywiania roślin ziemniaka za pomocą biostymulatorów. Prog. Plant. Prot. 63, 35–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.14199/ppp-2023-004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14199/ppp-2023-004
  15. Pszczółkowski P., Barbaś P., Sawicka B., Krochmal-Marczak B., 2020. Biological and agrotechnical aspects of weed control in the cultivation of early potato cultivars under cover. Agriculture 10(9), 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10090373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10090373
  16. Roztropowicz S. (red.), 1999. Metodyka obserwacji pomiarów i pobierania prób w agrotechnicznych doświadczeniach z ziemniakiem. Wyd. IHAR Oddział w Jadwisinie, ss. 1–50.
  17. Shehata S.A., Abouziena H.F., Abdelgawad K.F., Elkhawaga F.A., 2019. Weed control efficacy, growth and yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) as affected by alternative weed control methods. Potato Res. 62, 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-018-9404-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-018-9404-1
  18. Skowera B., Puła J., 2004. Skrajne warunki pluwiotermiczne w okresie wiosennym na obszarze Polski w latach 1971–2000. Acta Agrophys. 3(1), 171–177.
  19. Trawczyński C., 2020. Wpływ biostymulatorów na plon i jakość bulw ziemniaka uprawianego w warunkach suszy i wysokiej temperatury. Biul. IHAR, 289, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.37317/biul-2020-0017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37317/biul-2020-0017
  20. Urbanowicz J., 2016. Zachwaszczenie plantacji ziemniaka w Polsce w latach 2000–2015. Ziemn. Pol. 26(3), 42–47.
  21. Urbanowicz J., 2021. Skuteczność zwalczania chwastów w ziemniaku za pomocą wybranych herbicydów przedwschodowych. Ziemn. Pol. 1, 24–34.
  22. Wadas W., 2023. Nutritional value and sensory quality of new potatoes in response to silicon application. Agriculture 13(3), 542–552. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030542 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030542
  23. Wichrowska D., Jaskólski D., 2014. Effect of organic and mineral fertilization and soil fertilizer on the weed infestation of potato plantation. Acta Sci. Pol. Agric. 13(1), 61–71.
  24. Yadav S.L., Lal S.S., Srivastava A.K., Bag T.K., Singh B.P., 2015. Efficacy of chemical and non-chemical methods of weed management in rainfed potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 85, 382–386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i3.47160
  25. Yakhin O.I., Lubyanov A.A., Yakhin I.A., Brown P.H., 2017. Biostimulants in plant science: A global perspective. Front. Plant. Sci. 7, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.02049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.02049
  26. Zarzecka K., Gugała M., Grzywacz K., Sikorska A., 2020. Agricultural and economic effects of the use of biostimulants and herbicides in cultivation of the table potato cultivar Gawin. Acta Sci. Pol. Agricultura 19(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.37660/aspagr.2020.19.1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37660/aspagr.2020.19.1.1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.