Abstract
The aim of the study was to identify and assess the spatial diversity of generating of animal and vegetal waste by entities from the agricultural sector in the EU countries along with the determination of the importance of this type of waste in total waste generated in individual countries. Statistical data used in the study were obtained from EUROSTAT. The research period was 2016, while the research area covered 25 EU countries. The data was subjected to quantitative analysis using descriptive and parametric statistics. It was found that animal and vegetal waste has the largest share in the structure of waste from the agricultural sector (accounting for 81.6% of all waste in the agricultural sector in the EU in 2016). It has been shown that generating of vegetal and animal waste in agricultural sector in the EU countries is characterized by spatial diversity. Most of this waste type was generated in Spain and the Netherlands. The dominant position of Spain resulted from significant share of this country in the EU volume of animal faeces, urine and manure generation. High position of the Netherlands was associated with a large share of vegetal waste. France, Germany, Slovakia and Sweden ranked next. Nearly 80% of all analyzed groups of waste came from these countries, which indicates a high degree of spatial concentration of the studied phenomenon. In this context, it can be stated that these countries are predestined to base their development on the concept of the bioeconomy. It is a challenge for the research and development sphere regarding development of innovative ways of managing agricultural vegetal and animal waste.
References
- ANNEX ‒ Correspondence of waste codes to the four material flows MF1 to MF4, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/8105938/8465062/env_ac_cur_esms_MFA_correspondence.pdf [download date 19.03.2019].
- Bartoszczuk P., 2012. Opłacalność energetycznego wykorzystania energii elektrycznej z biologicznych nośników energii oraz wiatru. In: D. Niedziółka (ed.), Zielona energia w Polsce. CeDeWu, Warszawa, 153‒178.
- Biogas Barometer, 2017. Eurobserv’er, https://www.eurobserv-er.org/biogas-barometer-2017/ [download date 15.05.2019].
- Chyłek E.K., Niepytalski T., Śliwa J.A., 2016. Biogospodarka o obiegu zamkniętym. Przem. Spoż. 70(7), 2‒6, DOI 10.15199/65.2016.7.1
- Commission Regulation (EU) No 849/2010 of 27 September 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 2150/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste statistics (Text with EEA relevance), 2010. Official Journal of the European Union, L 253/2.
- Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Eco-nomic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe, 2012. COM(2012) 60, Brussels, http://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/201202_innovating_sustainable_ growth [down-load date 15.05.2019].
- Directive 2008/98/EC of The European Parliament and of The Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (Text with EEA relevance), 2008. Official Journal of the European Union, L 312/3.
- Directorate-General for Environment, European Commision, Circular Economy Package, ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/index_en.html [download date 15.05.2019].
- EBA Statistical Report, 2018. Annual Statistical Report of the European Biogas Association European Overview Chapter, 2018. European Biogas Association (EBA), Brussels.
- EUROSTAT, 2019a. Eurostat’s Database, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat [download date 19.03.2019].
- EUROSTAT, 2019b. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:Purchasing_power_standard_(PPS) [download date 28.04.2019].
- Godlewska-Majkowska H., Komor A., 2014. Biogospodarka a zarządzanie marketingowe w wy-branych jednostkach samorządu terytorialnego. Pr. Nauk. UE Wrocł. Gospod. Przestrz. 341, 23‒36, DOI: 10.15611/pn.2014.341.02
- Gradziuk P., 2017. Potencjał i prognozy wykorzystania biogazu rolniczego w Polsce. Rocz. Nauk. Stow. Ekon. Agrobiz. 19(3), 64‒70.
- Kacprzak M., Chabelski T., Zakrzewski J., 2018. Przetwarzanie odpadów biodegradowalnych na organiczno-wapniowy nawóz oraz dystrybucja i plonotwórcza efektywność nawozu. Inż. Ekol. 6, 182‒190, DOI: 10.12912/23920629/99309
- Komor A., 2018. Przestrzenne zróżnicowanie produkcji biomasy rolniczej pochodzenia roślinnego w państwach UE w kontekście rozwoju biogospodarki. Zesz. Nauk. SGGW Warsz. Probl. Roln. Świat. 18(1), 100‒110, DOI: 10.22630/PRS.2018.18.1.9.
- Kowalczyk-Juśko A., 2008. Wykorzystanie wybranych odpadów z przemysłu rolno-spożywczego jako substratów do produkcji biogazu. In: P. Gradziuk (ed.), Energia odnawialna. „Wieś Jutra”, Płońsk–Warszawa, 125‒132.
- Łabętowicz J., Stępień W., Kobiałka M., 2019. Innowacyjne technologie przetwarzania odpadów na nawozy agroekologicznej użyteczności. Inż. Ekol. 1, 13‒23, DOI: 10.12912/23920629/106203
- Lewandowski W.M., Ryms M., Meler P., 2010. Techniczno-chemiczna piroliza do biopaliw ciekłych i gazowych, jako metoda podnoszenia sprawności konwersji energii biomasy. Nafta-Gaz 8, 675‒680.
- Owczuk M., Wardzińska D., Zamojska-Jaroszewicz A., Matuszewska A., 2013. Wykorzystanie odpadów biodegradowalnych do produkcji biogazu jako alternatywnego źródła energii odnawialnej. Stud. Ecol. Bioeth. UKSW 11(3), 133‒144.
- Poskrobko B., Poskrobko T., 2012. Zarządzanie środowiskiem w Polsce. PWE, Warszawa.
- Pyłka-Gutowska E., 2004. Ekologia z ochroną środowiska. Oświata, Warszawa.
- Rechkemmer A., Falkenhayn L. von, 2009. The human dimensions of global environmental change: Ecosystem services, resilience and governance. Eur. Phys. J. Conferences 1, 3‒17, EDP Sciences, DOI: 10.1140/epiconf/e2009-00906-y
- Regulation (EU) No 691/2011 of The European Parliament and of The Council of 6 July 2011 on European environmental economic accounts (Text with EEA relevance), 2011. Official Journal of the European Union, L 192/1.
- Sabiiti E.N., 2011. Utilising agricultural waste to enhance food security and conserve the environment. Afr. J. Food Agric. Nutr. Dev. 11(6), 1‒9.
- Sadecka Z., Suchowska-Kisielewicz M., 2016. Możliwość wykorzystania substratów organicznych w procesie fermentacji. Rocz. Ochr. Środ. 18, 400‒413.
- Saveyn H., Eder P. (tłumaczenie B. Wiese), 2014. Kryteria end-of-waste dla odpadów biodegradowalnych poddawanych obróbce biologicznej (kompost i fermentat): Propozycje techniczne. Raport końcowy. IPTS Sewilla, Hiszpania, DOI: 10.2791/6295, available online: http://pigo.org.pl?wp-content/uploads/2015/07/JRC87124_PL-2.pdf [download date 15.05.2019].
- Wytyczne w zakresie wykorzystania produktów ubocznych oraz zalecanego postępowania z odpadami w rolnictwie i przemyśle rolno-spożywczym, 2010. Wyd. ITP, Falenty-Warszawa.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
-
Armand Kasztelan,
The state and opportunities of ecological agriculture development in Poland on the example of Lublin region
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 59 No. 1 (2004)
-
ALICJA SŁUPSKA,
Diversity of forestry sector in Poland in comparison to the European Union
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 71 No. 3 (2016)
-
Anna Barbara Majchrowska-Safaryan,
Cezary Tkaczuk,
Pavol Findura,
Krzysztof Kapela,
Mirolslav Pristavka,
Occurrence of entomopathogenic fungi in cultivated soils in Slovakia in the intensive agricultural system production
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 80 No. 2 (2025)
-
Alina Syp,
Robert Borek,
Dariusz Osuch,
Economic and environmental performance of the arable organic farms of the selected EU countries
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 79 No. 1 (2024)
-
ANNA NOWAK,
ARTUR KRUKOWSKI,
Competitiveness of farms in new European Union member states
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 74 No. 2 (2019)
-
Marek Kołodziejczyk,
Kamil Gwóźdź,
The effect of fertilizers containing free amino acids on the yield of modern and old common wheat cultivars in organic production
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 78 No. 2 (2023)
-
MORTEZA HOSSEINZADEH,
FARIBORZ SHEKARI,
MOHSEN JANMOHAMMADI,
NASER SABAGHNIA,
Effect of sowing date and foliar application of salicylic acid on forage yields and quality of globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 68 No. 2 (2013)
-
Elsayed M. Zeidan,
Abdel-Satar A. El-Khawaga,
Hamdy A. Basha,
Ismail M. El-Hmeed,
Improvement of wheat productivity in newly reclaimed soil in Egypt
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 60 (2005)
-
NASER SABAGHNIA,
MOHSEN JANMOHAMMADI,
ADEL BASHIRI,
REZA ASGHARI-SHIRGHAN,
Genetic variation of several bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes based on some morphological traits
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 69 No. 1 (2014)
-
BARBARA SAWICKA,
PIOTR PSZCZÓŁKOWSKI,
HONORATA DANILČENKO,
ELVYRA JARIENE,
Impact of ultrasounds on physicochemical characteristics of potato tubers
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 75 No. 1 (2020)
<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.