Abstrakt
In this study, gene action, genetic variances (δ2A and δ2D ), and combining abilities were estimated for fruit related traits using North Carolina Design ІІ (NCD ІІ) for ten different parental genotypes of greenhouse cucumber. This experiment was performed over a two-year period from 2014 to 2015. The variance components
of male, female, and male × female were found to be significant for all the studied traits in a combined analysis of variance. Genetic component analysis showed that fruit diameter, fruit length, total fruit weight, fruit number in early picking and fruit number per node were predominantly under the additive gene action, but internode length and plant height were under the dominance of gene action. Male × female × environment interaction was significant for total fruit weight. The highest general combining ability (GCA) effect for total fruit yield was observed in Zohal (male parent) and YaldaR2 (female parent) genotypes. GCA estimation revealed that male parent of Adrian 4510 provided good general combiners for total fruit number. Specific combining ability (SCA) estimation determined the suitability of Janeete × Adrian 4510. Salar hybrid exhibited higher positive SCA effects for total fruit yield and total fruit number in early picking.
Bibliografia
Acquaah, G. (2012). Principles of plant genetics and breed-ing. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
Bhateria, S., Hateria, S., Sood, S.P., Pathania A. (2006). Genetic analysis of quantitative traits across environ-ments in linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.). Euphytica, 1, 185–194.
Comstock, R.E., Robinson, H.E. (1948). The components of genetic variance populations. Biometrics, 4, 254–266.
Dogra, B.S., Kanwar, M.S. (2011). Exploitation of combin-ing ability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Res. J. Agric. Sci., 2, 55–59.
Falconer, D.S., Mackay, J. (1996). Introduction to quantita-tive genetics. 4th ed. Longman, Essex. FAO STAT, 2012. www.fao.org/faostat/es/
Golabadi, M., Golkar, P., Eghtedary, A.R. (2015). Combin-ing ability analysis of fruit yield and morphological traits in greenhouse cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Can. J. Plant Sci., 95(2), 377–385.
Gulam-ud-Din, N.A., Ahmed, N. (2002). Studies and com-bining ability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Appl. Biol. Res., 4, 31–38.
Hormuzdi, S.G., More, T.A. (1989). Studies on combining ability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed., 49, 161–165.
Jagesh, K., Munshi, A.D., Kumar, R., Sureja, A.K., Shar-ma, R.K. (2013). Combining ability and its relationship with gene action in slicing cucumber. Indian J. Hortic., 70, 135–138.
Joshi, S.K., Sharma, S.N., Singhania, D.L., Sain, R.S. (2004). Combining ability in the F1 and F2 generations of diallel cross in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell). Heriditas., 141, 115–21.
Kanobdee, J., Lavapaurya, T., Subhadrabandhu, S., Srinives, P. (1990). Combining ability of yield and yield components in pickling cucumber. Kasetsart J., 24, 102–107.
Kearsey, M.J., Pooni, H.S. (1996). The genetical analysis of quantitative traits. Chapman and Hall, London.
King, J.G., Quinby, J.R., Stephens, J.C., Kramer, N.W., Lahr, K.A. (1961). An evaluation of parents of grain sorghum hybrids. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull., M.P. 510.
Liebig, H.P., Fricke, A., Iebig, H.P., Fricke, A. (2002). Cucurbitaceae (Kurbisgewachse). In: Gemuse produc-tion Krug, H., Liebig, H.P., Stutzel, H., Verlag Eugen, Ulmer, Stuttgart, 330–345.
Lopez-Sese, A.I., Staub, J. (2002). Combining ability anal-ysis of yield components in cucumber. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 127, 931–937.
Mather, K., Jinks, J.K. (1982). Introduction to biometrical genetics. 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall, London.
Mule, P.N., Khandelwel, V., Patil, A.B., Chaudhary, B.R. (2011). Combining ability studies in cucumber (Cu-cumis sativus L.). Vegetable Sci., 38, 203–205.
Munshi, A.D., Kumar, R., Panda, B., 2006. Combining ability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 76, 750–752.
Nduwumuremyi, A., Tongoona, P., Habimana, S. (2013). Mating designs: helpful tool for quantitative plant breed-ing analysis. J. Plant Breed. Genet., 1(3), 117–129.
Olfati, J.A. Samizadeh, H., Rabiei, B., Peyvast, G.H. (2012). Griffing’s methods comparison for general and specific combining ability in cucumber. Sci. World J., 1–4.
Plader, W., Burza, W., Malepszy, S. (2007). Cucamber. Biotechnol. Agric. For. 59, Transgenic Crops IV, 181–199.
Robinson, R.W., Decker-Walters, D.S. (1997). Cucurbits. CAB International, New York, NY, USA.
Sarkar, M., Sirohi, P.S. (2011). Diallel analysis of quantita-tive characters in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Veg-etable Sci., 38, 73–75.
SAS Institute Inc. (2002). SAS/STAT 9 user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary.
Shetty, N.V., Wehner, T.C. (2002). Screening the cucum-ber germplasm collection for fruit yield and quality. Crop Sci., 42, 2174–2183.
Singh, R., Singh, A.K., Kumar, S., Singh, B.K., Singh, S.P. (2011). Studies on combining ability in Cucumber (Cu-cumis sativus L.). Vegetable Sci., 38, 49–52.
Singh, S., Pawar, I.S. (2005). Theory and application of biometrical genetics. 1st ed. CBS Press, Frederiksberg.
Strefeler, M.S., Wehner, T.C. (1986). Estimates of herita-bilities and genetic variances of three yield and five quality traits in three fresh-market cucumber popula-tions. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 111(4), 599–605.
Wang, Y.H., Behera, T.K., Kole, C.H. (2011). Genetics, genomics and breeding of cucurbits. CRC Press, Boca Raton–New York–Abingdon.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
