Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ASPHC Baner

Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023)

Articles

The impact of foliar dikegulac and Asahi SL sprays on the shoot production of highbush blueberry nursery plants

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2023.4329
Submitted: August 13, 2021
Published: 2023-02-24

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the usefulness of dikegulac (2,3:4,6-di-O-isopropylidene-α-Lxylo-2-hexulofuranosonic acid) and Asahi SL (sodium ortho- and para-nitrophenolate, sodium 5-nitroguaiacolate) in production of highbush blueberry nursery plants. The experiment was carried out on three cultivars of highbush blueberry: ‘Bluecrop’, ‘Brigitta blue’ and ‘Darrow’. Pot plants were treated two times with dikegulac (0.1%) or/and Asahi SL (0.2%) foliar sprays in the late spring. The reaction of blueberry clones to the tested chemicals was different. Dikegulac-treated plants developed significantly more shoots making them a good and efficient source of cuttings when using the traditional propagation. Dikegulac limited the shoot elongation of two studied cultivars (‘Bluecrop’, ‘Darrow’). It also reduced the size of leaf blades but generally did not change the fluorescence and the relative content of chlorophyll. The influence of dikegulac in the applied dose was much stronger than the impact of nitrophenolates. The application of Asahi SL, alone or together with dikegulac, did not give any spectacular and advantageous effects.

References

  1. Antonopoulou, C., Dimassi, K., Therios, I., Chatzissavvidis, C. (2018). Does dikegulac affect in vitro shoot proliferation and hyperhydricity incidence in olive explants? Hort. Sci. (Prague), 45, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.17221/212/2016-HORTSCI DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/212/2016-HORTSCI
  2. Banko, T.J., Stefani, M.A. (1995). Cutless and Atrimmec for controlling growth of woody landscape plants in containers. J. Environ. Hortic., 13(1), 22–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-13.1.22
  3. Banko, T., Stefani, M. (1996). Chemical growth control of Salvia farinacea ‘Victoria Blue’. Proc. SNA Res. Conf., 41, 214–215.
  4. Bocion, P.F., de Silva, W.H. (1977). Some effects of dikegulac on the physiology of whole plants and tissues: interactions with plant hormones. In: Plant growth regulation. Proceedings in life sciences, Pilet, P.E. (eds). Springer, Berlin−Heidelberg, 189−198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-66589-9_21
  5. Chen, Y., Dong, H. (2016). Mechanisms and regulation of senescence and maturity performance in cotton. Field Crops Res., 189, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02.003
  6. Cline, M.G. (1996). Exogenous auxin effects on lateral bud outgrowth in decapitated shoots. Ann. Bot., 78, 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0119
  7. Cline, M.G. (1997). Concepts and terminology of apical dominance. Am. J. Bot., 84, 1064–1069. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2446149
  8. Cochran, D.R., Fulcher, A. (2013). Type and rate of plant growth regulator influence vegetative, floral growth, and quality of Little Lime™ Hydrangea. Horttechnology, 23, 306–311. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.23.3.306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.23.3.306
  9. Csizinszky, A.A. (2001). Yield response of bell pepper cultivars to foliar-applied ‘Atonik’ biostimulant. Horticultural Sciences Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, HS819.
  10. Djanaguiraman, M., Devi, D.D., Sheeba, J.A., Bangarusamy, U., Babu, R.Ch. (2004). Effect of oxidative stress on abscission of tomato fruits and its regulation by nitrophenols. Tropical Agric. Res., 16, 25–36.
  11. Djanaguiraman, M., Sheeba, J.A., Devi, D.D., Bangarusamy, U. (2005a). Effect of Atonik seed treatment on seedling physiology of cotton and tomato. J. Biol. Sci., 5(2), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2005.163.169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2005.163.169
  12. Djanaguiraman, M., Sheeba, J.A., Devi, D.D., Bangarusamy, U. (2005b). Response of cotton to Atonik and TIBA for growth, enzymes and yield. J. Biol. Sci., 5(2), 158–162. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2005.158.162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2005.158.162
  13. Djanaguiraman, M., Sheeba, J.A., Devi, D.D., Bangarusamy, U. (2009). Cotton leaf senescence can be delayed by nitrophenolate spray through enhanced antioxidant defence system. J. Agron. Crop. Sci., 195, 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2009.00360.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2009.00360.x
  14. Górnik, K., Grzesik, M. (2008). Improvement of rooting and development of grapevine cuttings by Asahi SL, Biochikol 020 pc, Tytanit, Citrosept and Biosept. In: Monographs series: biostimulators in modern agriculture, Fruit Crops. Wieś Jutra, Warszawa, 31–41.
  15. Grossman, M., Freeborn, J., Scoggins, H., Latimer, J. (2013). Timing of benzyladenine and dikegulac sodium application affects branching of liners and finished herbaceous perennial plants. HortScience, 48(7), 875–882. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.48.7.875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.48.7.875
  16. Jacyna, T., Starbuck, C.J., Ellersiek, M.R. (1994). Increasing branching of landscape pear trees with promalin and dikegulac-sodium. J. Environ. Hortic., 12, 90–92. https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-12.2.90 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-12.2.90
  17. Kocira, A., Kocira, S., Stryjecka, M. (2015). Effect of Asahi SL application on common bean yield. Agric. Agric. Sci. Proc., 7, 103–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.12.045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.12.045
  18. Libbenga, K.R., Mennes, A.M. (1987). Hormone binding and its role in hormone action. In: Plant hormones and their role in plant growth and development, Davies P.J. (ed.). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 194–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3585-3_11
  19. Litwińczuk, W., Prokop, A. (2010). The usefulness of dikegulac in propagation of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) ‘Herbert’. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res., 18(2), 85–92.
  20. Litwińczuk, W., Szczerba, G., Wrona, D., (2005). Field performance of highbush blueberries (Vaccinium × corymbosum L.) cv. ‘Herbert’ propagated by cuttings and tissue culture. Sci. Hort., 106(2), 162−169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2005.02.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2005.02.025
  21. MARD gov.pl (2022). Wyszukiwarka Środków Ochrony Roślin – zastosowanie. Ministerstwo Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi [Plant Protection Products Search Engine – application. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. Available: https://www.gov.pl/web/rolnictwo/wyszukiwarka-srodkow-ochrony-roslin---zastosowanie [date of update: 15.07.2022, date of access: 21.07.2022].
  22. Marosz, A., Matysiak, B. (2005). Influence of growth retardants on growth and flower bud formation in rhododendron and azalea. Dendrobiology, 54, 35–40.
  23. Mendoza de Gyves, E., Mira, F.R., Ruiu, F., Rugini, E. (2008). Stimulation of node and lateral shoot formation in micropropagation of olive (Olea europaea L.) by using dikegulac. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 92, 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-007-9314-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-007-9314-4
  24. Norcini, J.G., Aldrich, J.H., McDowell, J.M. (1994). Flowering response of Bougainvillea cultivars to dikegulac. HortScience, 29, 282–284. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.29.4.282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.29.4.282
  25. Pozo, L., Redondo, A., Hartmond, U., Kender, W.J., Burns, J.K. (2004). Dikegulac promotes abscission in citrus. HortScience, 39, 1655–1658. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.39.7.1655 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.39.7.1655
  26. Przybysz, A., Wrochna, M., Słowiński, A., Gawrońska, H. (2010). Stimulatory effect of Asahi SL on selected plant species. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 9(2), 53–64.
  27. Rademacher, W. (2015). Plant growth regulators: backgrounds and uses in plant production. J. Plant Growth. Regul., 34, 845–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-015-9541-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-015-9541-6
  28. Sachs, R.M., Hield, H., Debie, J. (1975). Dikegulac, a promising new foliar-applied growth regulator for woody species. HortScience, 10, 367–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.10.4.367
  29. Sansberro, P., Mroginski, L., Bottini, R. (2006). Stimulation of lateral branch formation on Ilex paraguariensis (Aquifoliaceae) seedlings. Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 46(5), 707–710. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA04178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/EA04178
  30. Sarropoulou, V., Dimassi-Theriou, K., Therios, I. (2014). Dikegulac-sodium effect on micropropagation and biochemical parameters in the cherry rootstocks CAB-6P and Gisela 6. Turk. J. Agric. Nat. Sci., 2, 1713–1726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1212-81
  31. Serres, R.A., Zeldin, E.L., McCown, B.H., Yarborough, D.E. (ed.), Smagula, J.M. (1997). Applying biotechnological approaches to Vaccinium improvement: a review. Acta Hort., 446, 221–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.446.32
  32. Stutte, C.A., Clark, T.H. (1990). Radiolabeled studies of Atonik in cotton using HPLC. Altheimer Laboratory, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703, USA, Arysta LifeScience Report.
  33. Sun, Y., Bi, G., Niu, G., Perez, C. (2015). Foliar application of dikegulac sodium increases branching of ‘Merritt’s Supreme’ bigleaf hydrangea. Horttechnology, 3, 306–312. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.25.3.306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.25.3.306
  34. Thetford, M., Berry, J.B. (2000). Response of five woody landscape plants to Primo and pruning. J. Environ. Hortic., 18, 128–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-18.3.132
  35. Vavrina, C.S. (1998a). Atonik plant growth stimulator: effect on bell pepper under drip irrigation in SW Florida. Veg. Hortic., 23 Mar. 98. Available: www.imok.ufl.edu/veghort/pubs/sta_rpts/atonikpepper97
  36. Vavrina, C.S. (1998b). Atonik plant growth stimulator: effect on cucumber under seepage irrigation in SW Florida. Veg. Hortic., 30 Mar. 98. Available: www.imok.ufl.edu/veghort/pubs/sta_rpts/ atoncuke97
  37. Vavrina, C.S. (1998c). Atonik plant growth stimulator: effect on tomato under seepage irrigation in SW Florida. Veg. Hortic. 06 Apr. 98. Available: www.imok.ufl.edu/veghort/pubs/sta_rpts/ atoniktom97
  38. Whipker, B.E., Latimer, J.G. (2016). Wide assortment of available PGRs. Grower talks. 2016-17. Guide to growing top-quality perennials. Ball Publishing, West Chicago, 10–57.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.