Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2014)

Articles

EFFECTS OF NANOTECHNOLOGY LIQUID FERTILIZERS ON THE PLANT GROWTH AND YIELD OF CUCUMBER (Cucumis sativus L.)

Submitted: November 26, 2020
Published: 2014-06-30

Abstract

Various fertilizers are used in order to increase the yield and quality of the cultivated vegetables. Therefore, products obtained from different sources can be used as fertilizer. Fertilizers produced with nanotechnology are one of them. Fertilizers derived from nanotechnology have started to attract attention in agriculture nowadays. This study was undertaken to determine the effects of nanotechnology liquid fertilizer on the plant growth and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). The experiment was carried out in the Department of Horticulture at Ataturk University under unheated greenhouse conditions in Erzurum, Turkey, in 2011–2012. The doses of 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 L ha-1 of Nanonat and Ferbanat were used as fertilizer source. The plant leaves were sprayed with Nanonat and Ferbanat
suspension until becoming wet at ten day intervals for three times during plant growth. The results showed that the fertilizer treatments significantly improved the yield compared to control. According to the average of years the highest yield (149.17 t ha-1) occurred in Ferbanat 4.0 L ha-1 application. As a result, this study suggested that the foliar applications of liquid fertilizer could improve the plant growth and yield of cucumbers.

References

Baruah S., Dutta J., 2009. Nanotechnology applications in pollution sensing and degradation in agriculture: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 7(3), 191–204.
DeRosa M.C., Monreal C., Schnitzer M., Walsh R, Sultan Y., 2010. Nanotechnology in fertilizers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5(2), 91.
Ditta A., 2012. How helpful is nanotechnology in agriculture? Adv. Nat. Sci.: Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 3, 10.
Ekinci M., Dursun A., Yıldırım E., Parlakova F., 2012. The effects of nanotechnological liquid fertilizers on plant growth and yield in tomato. 9. Ulusal Sebze Tarımı Sempozyumu, 326–329, 14–12 Eylül, Konya, 2012 (Turkish).
Ferbanat L, 2013. http://www.ferbant.com/, December.
Khan W., Prithiviraj B., Smith D.L., 2003. Photosynthetic responses of corn and soybean to foliar application of salicylates. J. Plant Physiol. 160, 485–492.
Mousavi S.R., Rezaei M., 2011. Nanotechnology in agriculture and food production. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci. 1(10), 414–419.
Nanonat, 2013. http://www.nanotim.com/index-tr.php., December.
Neufeld H., Chappelka A.H., Somers G.L., Burkey K.O., Davison A.W., Finkelstein P., 2006. Visible foliar injury caused by ozone alters the relationship between SPAD meter readings and chlorophyll concentrations in cut leaf coneflower. Photosynth. Res. 87, 281–286.
Srilatha B., 2011. Nanotechnology in agriculture. J. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. 2, 7, 5.
Wang X., Song H., Liu Q., Rong X., Peng J., Xie G., Zhang Z., Wang S., 2011. Effects of nanopreparation coated nitrogen fertilizer on nutrient absorption and yield of early rice. http://enki.com.en/Article_en/.htm.
Wu W., Mao Y., Liang Y., Zhu F., Sun G., 2012. Optimization of function parameters of nanomaterials on germination of paper. http://en.enki.com.en/Article_en/htm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.