Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ASPHC Baner

ONLINE FIRST

Articles

Nondestructive discrimination of advanced clones and cultivars of strawberry using an innovative approach involving image analysis and machine learning

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2025.5370
Submitted: April 8, 2024
Published: 27.03.2025

Abstract

Different clones and cultivars of strawberry can differ in morphological and chemical properties, as well as productivity, adaptation to cultivation conditions,  and post-harvest quality during storage and processing. Due to differences in the quality of raw materials and final products depending on the strawberry clone/cultivar, correct distinguishing clones and cultivars is important for growers, consumers and processors. This study was aimed at distinguishing advanced clones and cultivars of strawberry using an innovative approach involving image processing and artificial intelligence. The raw material included the advanced clones and cultivars of strawberry, such as clone with the breeding code T-201457-16 (Grandarosa × Elsanta), clone T-201536-06 (Clery × Grandarosa), clone T-201567-01 (Patty × Panvik), as well as the cultivars Fibion, Grandarosa, and Markat. The fruit image acquisition was performed using a digital camera. As many as 2172 image parameters were extracted from the image of each fruit converted to different color channels R, G, B, L, a, b, X, Y, Z, U, V, and S and textures with the highest discriminative power were selected to develop models using various machine learning algorithms, such as Multilayer Perceptron, MultiClass Classifier, IBk, and LMT, Linear Discriminant, Quadratic SVM, Subspace Discriminant, and Wide Neural Network. The most accurate classifications were obtained for a model built using Subspace Discriminant (96.30%) and Multilayer Perceptron (95.83%). For the model developed using Subspace Discriminant, clone T-201567-01 and cultivar Markat were completely correctly classified with the highest accuracy of 100%. Whereas in the case of the model built using Multilayer Perceptron clone T-201567-01 was characterized by the highest classification metrics, such as Precision and F-measure equal to 0.983, MCC of 0.980, PRC Area and ROC Area of 1.000. The developed approach can be used in practice to discriminate advanced clones and cultivars of strawberry in an objective and nondestructive manner.

References

  1. Amoriello, T., Ciccoritti, R., Ferrante, P. (2022). Prediction of strawberries’ quality parameters using artificial neural networks. Agronomy, 12, 963. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040963
  2. Boonyakiat, D., Chuamuangphan, C., Maniwara, P., Seehanam, P. (2016). Comparison of physico-chemical quali-ty of different strawberry cultivars at three maturity stages. Int. Food Res. J., 23, 2405–2412.
  3. Bouckaert, R.R., Frank, E., Hall, M., Kirkb, R., Reutemann, P., Seewald, A., Scuse, D. (2016) WEKA manual for version 3-9-1. University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
  4. Choi, J.Y., Seo, K., Cho, J.S., Moon, K.D. (2021). Applying convolutional neural networks to assess the external quality of strawberries. J. Food Compos. Anal., 102, 104071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2021.104071
  5. de Souzam D.C., Ossani, P.C., Costa, A.S., Guerra, T.S., Araújo, A.L., Resende, F.V., Resende, L.V. (2021). Selection of experimental strawberry clones for fruit appearance attributes. Pesqi. Agropecu. Bras., 56, e02560. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2021.v56.02560
  6. Dziadczyk, P., Bolibok, H., Tyrka, M., Hortyński, J.A. (2003). In vitro selection of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) clones tolerant to salt stress. Euphytica, 132(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024647600516
  7. Frank, E., Hall, M.A., Witten, I.H. (2016). The WEKA Workbench. Online appendix for data mining: practical ma-chine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington.
  8. Galvão, A.G., Resende, L.V., Maluf, W.R., de Resende, J.T.V., Ferraz, A.K.L., Marodin, J.C. (2017). Breeding new improved clones for strawberry production in Brazil. Acta Sci. Agron., 39, 149–155. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v39i2.30773
  9. Gao, Z., Shao, Y., Xuan, G., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Han, X. (2020) Real-time hyperspectral imaging for the in-field esti-mation of strawberry ripeness with deep learning. Artif. Intell. Agric., 4, 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2020.04.003
  10. Jung, H.J., Veerappan, K., Natarajan, S., Jeong, N., Hwang, I., Nagano, S., Shirasawa, K., Isobe, S., Nou, I.S. (2017). A system for distinguishing octoploid strawberry cultivars using high-throughput SNP genotyping. Tropical Plant Biol., 10, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12042-017-9185-8
  11. Ladika, G., Strati, I.F., Tsiaka, T., Cavouras, D., Sinanoglou, V.J. (2024). On the assessment of strawberries’ shelf-life and quality, based on image analysis, physicochemical methods, and chemometrics. Foods, 13, 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13020234
  12. Lee, C., Lee, J., Lee, J. (2022). Relationship of fruit color and anthocyanin content with related gene expression differ in strawberry cultivars during shelf life. Sci. Hortic., 301, 111109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111109
  13. Liu, Q., Sun, K., Peng, J., Xing, M., Pan, L., Tu, K. (2018). Identification of bruise and fungi contamination in straw-berries using hyperspectral imaging technology and multivariate analysis. Food Anal. Methods, 11, 1518–1527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-017-1136-3
  14. Parra-Palma, C., Morales-Quintana, L., Ramos, P. (2020). Phenolic content, color development, and pig-ment−related gene expression: a comparative analysis in different cultivars of strawberry during the ripening process. Agronomy, 10, 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040588
  15. Patel, A., Lee, W.S., Peres, N.A. (2021). Strawberry plant wetness detection using computer vision and deep learning. Smart Agric. Technol., 1, 100013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2021.100013
  16. Patel, H., Taghavi, T., Samtani, J.B. (2023). Fruit quality of several strawberry cultivars during the harvest season under high tunnel and open field environments. Horticulturae, 9, 1084. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101084
  17. Ropelewska, E. (2022). Diversity of plum stones based on image texture parameters and machine learning algo-rithms. Agronomy, 12, 762. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040762
  18. Ropelewska, E., Cai, X., Zhang, Z., Sabanci, K., Aslan, M.F. (2022). Benchmarking machine learning approaches to evaluate the cultivar differentiation of plum (Prunus domestica L.) kernels. Agriculture, 12, 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12020285
  19. Ropelewska, E., Rady, A.M., Watson, N.J. (2023). Apricot stone classification using image analysis and machine learning. Sustainability, 15, 9259. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129259
  20. Strzelecki, M., Szczypiński, P., Materka, A., Klepaczko, A. (2013) A software tool for automatic classification and segmentation of 2D/3D medical images. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., sec. A, Accel. Spectrom. Detect. As-soc. Equip., 702, 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2012.09.006
  21. Sturm, K., Koron, D., Stampar, F. (2003). The composition of fruit of different strawberry varieties depending on maturity stage. Food Chem., 83, 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00124-9
  22. Su, Z., Zhang, C., Yan, T., Zhu, J., Zeng, Y., Lu. X. et al. (2021) Application of hyperspectral imaging for maturity and soluble solids content determination of strawberry with deep learning approaches. Front. Plant Sci., 12 ,736334. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.736334
  23. Sun, C., Yang, X., Gu, Q., Jiang, G., Shen, L., Zhou, J., Li, L., Chen, H., Zhang, G., Zhang, Y. (2023). Comprehensive analysis of nanoplastic effects on growth phenotype, nanoplastic accumulation, oxidative stress response, gene expression, and metabolite accumulation in multiple strawberry cultivars. Science of The Total Environment 897, 165432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165432
  24. Szczypiński, P.M., Strzelecki, M., Materka, A. (2007) Mazda-a software for texture analysis. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Information Technology Convergence (ISITC 2007), Jeonju, Korea, 23–24 November 2007, pp. 245–249.
  25. Szczypiński, P.M., Strzelecki, M., Materka, A., Klepaczko, A. (2009). MaZda – A software package for image tex-ture analysis. Comp. Meth. Progr. Biomed., 94, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.08.005
  26. Şener, S., Sayğı, H., Duran, C.N. (2023). Responses of in vitro strawberry plants to drought stress under the influence of nano-silicon dioxide. Sustainability, 15, 15569. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115569
  27. Tang, X., Li, Y., Fang, M., Li, W., Hong, Y., Li, Y. (2024). Effects of different water storage and fertilizer retention substrates on growth, yield and quality of strawberry. Agronomy, 14, 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14010205
  28. Teribia, N., Buvé, C., Bonerz, D., Aschoff, J., Hendrickx, M., Van Loey, A. (2021). Effect of cultivar, pasteurization and storage on the volatile and taste compounds of strawberry puree. LWT (Lebensm. Wiss. Technol.), 150, 112007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112007
  29. Unlersen, M.F., Sonmez, M.E., Aslan, M.F., Demir, B., Aydin, N., Sabanci, K., Ropelewska, E. (2022). CNN–SVM hybrid model for varietal classification of wheat based on bulk samples. Eur. Food Res. Technol., 248, 2043–2052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-022-04029-4
  30. Whitaker, V.M. (2011). Applications of molecular markers in strawberry. J. Berry Res., 1, 115–127.
  31. Witten, I.H., Frank, E. (2005). Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. Elsevier, San Francisco.
  32. Yamamoto, K., Ninomiya, S., Kimura, Y., Hashimoto, A., Yoshioka, Y., Kameoka, T. (2015). Strawberry cultivar identification and quality evaluation on the basis of multiple fruit appearance features. Comput. Electron. Agric., 110, 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2014.11.018
  33. Zhang, C., Guo, C., Liu, F., Kong, W., He, Y., Lou, B. (2016). Hyperspectral imaging analysis for ripeness evaluation of strawberry with support vector machine. J. Food Eng., 179, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.01.002

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.