THE PROTECTIVE EFFECT OF BIOPREPARATIONS APPLIED AS THE DRESSING FOR COMMON BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) AND PEA (Pisum sativum L.)

Danuta Pięta

Agricultural University in Lublin

Elżbieta Patkowska

Agricultural University in Lublin

Alina Pastucha

Agricultural University in Lublin



Abstract

The studies conducted in a growth chamber observed the protective effect of biopreparations such as Biosept 33 SL, Biochikol 020 PC and Polyversum, used as seed dressing for common bean and pea. The fungicide Zaprawa Oxafun T was used as a comparison, while the seeds that were not dressed constituted the control. The studied plants grew in the medium grown over with different species of fungi pathogenic towards pea and common bean. Irrespective of the species, the fewest plants, with the greatest proportion of infected ones, were obtained in control combinations. The application of biopreparations and the fungicide turned out to be an effective protection of pea and common bean from the infection by the examined phytopathogens. Biosept 33 SL in the concentration of 0.2% showed to have the best effect among the tested biopreparations.

Keywords:

pea, common bean, biopreparations, fungicide, pathogenic fungi

Angioni A., Cabras P., Hellewin G., Pirsi F. M., Reniero F., Scirra M., 1998. Synthesis and inhibitory activity of 7-geranoxycoumarin against Penicillium species in Citrus fruit. Phytochemistry 4, 8, 1521–1525.
Lisansky S., G., Coombs J., 1994. Development in the market of biopesticides. Brighton Crop Prot. Res. Conference, 3, 1049–1054.
Łacicowa B., 1970. Badania szczepów Helminthosporium sorokinianum (= H. sativum) oraz odporność odmian jęczmienia jarego na ten czynnik chorobotwórczy. Acta Mycol. 6(2), 187–248.
Oktaba W., 1987. Metody statystyki matematycznej w doświadczalnictwie. PWN, Warszawa.
Orlikowski L. B., 2001. Effect of grapefruit extract on development of Phytophthora cryptogea and control of root rot of gerbera. J. Plant Prot. Res. 41, 3, 84–90.
Orlikowski L. B., Skrzypczak Cz., 2001. Biopreparat z wyciągu grejpfruta – postęp w biologicznej ochronie roślin przed chorobami. Annales UMCS, sectio EEE, IX, suppl., 261–269.
Orlikowski L. B., Skrzypczak Cz., 2003. Biocides in the control of soil-borne and leaf pathogens. Hortic. Veget. Grov. 22, (3), 426–433.
Orlikowski L. B., Skrzypczak Cz., Jaworska-Marosz A., 2001. Influence of grapefruit extract on the growth and development of Botrytis spp. and grey mold development on lily and peony. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Biol. Sci. 49, 4, 373–378.
Orlikowski L. B., Skrzypczak Cz., Wojdyła A., Jaworska-Marosz A., 2002. Wyciągi roślinne i mikroorganizmy w ochronie roślin przed chorobami. Zesz. Nauk. AR. Kraków, 387, (82), 19–32.
Patkowska E., Pita D., 2004. Introductory studies on the use of biopreparations and organic compounds for seed dressing of runner bean (Phaseolus coccineus L.). Folia Univ. Agric. Stetin., 2004. Agricultura 239, (95), 295–300.
Patkowska E., 2005. The effect of bipreparations on the healthiness of soybean cultivated in the conditions of a growth chamber. EJPAU, Horticulture, Volume 8, Issue 4. http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume8/issue4/art-08.html
Picard K., Ponchet M., Blein J. P., Rey P., Tirlly Y., Benhamou N., 2000. Oligandrin A proteinaceous molecule produced by the mycoparasite Pythium oligandrum induces resistance to Phytophthora parasitica infection in tomato plants. Plant Physiol. 124, 379–395.
Pięta D., 1992. Zdrowotność i plonowanie różnych odmian fasoli (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) w zależności od zmianowania. Biul. IHAR 181/182, 261–267.
Pięta D., Pastucha A., Struszczyk H., 2001a. Efficiency of chitosan in limiting fungi pathogenic for runner bean. Progress on Chemistry and Application of Chitin and Its Derivatives. Monograph VII, 73–78. H. Struszczyk (ed.). Polish Chitin Society, Łódź.
Pięta D., Pastucha A., Struszczyk H., Wójcik W., 2001b. Kształtowanie się zbiorowisk mikroorganizmów w glebie pod wpływem chitozanu i uprawy fasoli wielokwiatowej (Phaseolus coccineus L.). Acta Agrobot. 54, 2, 105–115.
Pięta D., Patkowska E., Pastucha A., 1998. The efficiency of microbiological dressing of pea (Pisum sativum L.) against pathogenic soilborne fungi. Ann. Agric. Sci. s. E, 1/2, 81–89.
Pospieszny H., Struszczyk H., 1994. Chitozan – potencjalny biopreparat przeciwko patogenom roślin. Mat. XXXIV Sesji Nauk. IOR, cz. I, 117–123.
Pospieszny H., Żołobowska L., Maćkowiak A., Struszczyk H., 1995. Antibacterial activity of chitin derivatives. Pol. Phytopathol. Soc., 99–102.
Sadowski Cz., Rzekanowski S., 1987. Wpływ nawadniania na plonowanie i zdrowotność żyta na glebie bardzo lekkiej. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. 133, 363–370.
Saniewska A., 2002a. Aktywność antygrzybowa endogennych flawonoidów grejpfruta (Citrus paradisi). Mat. Symp. Nauk. ,,Fitopatologia polska w Europie”. 17–19 września, 2002, 62.
Saniewska A., 2002b. Oddziaływanie biopreparatu Biosept 33 SL na Phoma narcissi Aderh. Post. Ochr. Roślin 42, (82), 801–803.
Solarska E., Jończyk K., 2003. Ocena skuteczności działania preparatu Biosept 33 SL w pszenicy ozimej uprawianej w systemie ekologicznym. J. Res. Appl. Agric. 48, (3), 20–23.
Stetter J., 1998. Pesticide innovation: Trends in research and development. MFLBER, 63/2a, 135–181.
Vesely D., Kocova L., 2001. Pythium oligandrum as the biological control agent the preparation of Polyversum. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci., Biol. Sci. 49, (3), 209–218.
Woedtke T., Schuter B., Pfleger P., Lindequist U., Julich U. D., 1999. Aspects of the antimicrobial efficacy of grapefruit seeds extract and its relation to preservative substances contained. Pharmacie 54, 6, 452–456.
Wojdyła A. T., 2001. Chitosan in the control of rose diseases-6year-trials. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Biol. Sci. 49, 3, 243–252.
Download

Published
2005-12-31



Danuta Pięta 
Agricultural University in Lublin
Elżbieta Patkowska 
Agricultural University in Lublin
Alina Pastucha 
Agricultural University in Lublin



License

 

Articles are made available under the conditions CC BY 4.0 (until 2020 under the conditions CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Submission of the paper implies that it has not been published previously, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

The author signs a statement of the originality of the work, the contribution of individuals, and source of funding.

 


Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>