Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 12 No. 5 (2013)

Articles

INFLUENCE OF CULTIVATION METHOD AND BULBS PLANTING DEPTH ON THE GROWTH AND YIELDING OF TULIPS

Submitted: December 16, 2020
Published: 2013-10-31

Abstract

Tulips belong to one of the most important bulbous plants from the economic point of view. Bulbs are reproduced in order to force for cut flowers. The biggest problem for the Polish producers is to obtain high yield of good quality bulbs, so that it is advisable to verify other than traditional methods of cultivation. The field experiment was conducted in 2006–2009. ‘Ballerina’ tulips were cultivated with a traditional method flat and on the ridges. Bulbs were planted at the depth of 9, 12, 15 and 19 cm. Cultivation methods used in the experiment did not affect the length of tulips flowering shoots. Tulips cultivated on the ridges produced longer tepals. Flowering shoots and tepals were shorter in case of tulips cultivated at the depth of 19 cm in comparison to those cultivated at the depth of 9–12 cm. Cultivation on the ridges led to production of 7.5% more of daughter bulbs and 8.2% of commercial bulbs. Weight of daughter bulbs was higher in ridge cultivation
on average by 10.8%, and the weight of commercial bulbs on average by 14% in relation to flat cultivation. Cultivation on the ridges also increased the amount and weight of first grade bulbs (of circumference of >12 cm) by respectively 19.5 and 23.3% in comparison to traditional cultivation. The highest yield of commercial bulbs in ridge cultivation was obtained when bulbs were planted at the depth of 12–15 cm. In flat cultivation, greater amount and weight of commercial yield bulbs and first grade bulbs was obtained by planting tulips at the depth of 15–19 cm. Cultivation on the ridges ensures better aeration of soil, what results in smaller share of bulbs infected with pathogens in the total yield, in comparison to flat cultivation.

References

Babik J., Dudek J., 2000. New, complex machine for ridge forming, and simultaneous sowing vegetable crops. Veg. Crops Res. Bull. 53, 103–110.
Babik, J., 2000. Wpływ nowego sposobu formowania redlin na plon i jakość korzeni cykorii sałatowej (Cichorium intybus L. var. foliosum Hegi). Annales UMCS sec. EEE, Horticultura 8, Suppl., 211–217.
Bing Q.Z., Zhang B.G., Zhang Z., Chen Z.H., 2008. Study on good agricultural practice for Tulipa edulis – planting density and sowing depth tests. China J. Chin. Mat. Med. 33(21), 2463–6.
Buschmann J.C.M., 2005. Globalisation – Flower – Flower Bulb – Bulb Flowers. Acta Hort. 673, 27–33.
Cebulak T., Sady W., 2000. Effect of cultivation methods on nutritive compounds in the carrot. Fol. Hort. 12(1), 77–84.
Ferens E., 2007. Wpływ zróżnicowanej uprawy roli i roślin na skład gatunkowy i liczebność chwastów w uprawie cykorii korzeniowej. Zesz. Nauk. AR Kraków 444, 93, 215–221.
Konopiński M., 2009. Influence of intercrop plants and varied tillage on yields and nutritional value of salsify (Tragopogon porrifolius L.) roots. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 8(2), 27–36.
Konopiński M., 2011. Influence of intercrop plants and varied tillage on yields and nutritional value of scorzonera (Scorzonera hispanica L.) roots. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 10(1), 49–59.
Konopiński M., Ferens E., 2007. Wpływ zróżnicowanej uprawy roli i roślin na skład gatunkowy i liczebność chwastów w uprawie skorzonery. Rocz. AR Poznań 383, Ogrodnictwo, 41, 533–540.
Konopiński M., Ferens E., 2011. Influence of cultivation methods and foliar nutrition with Cu and Mn on yields and biological value of scorzonera (Scorzonera hispanica L.) roots. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 10(4), 141–151.
Le Nard M., De Hertogh A., 2002. Research needs for flower bulbs (geophytes). Acta Hort. 570, 121–127.
Michalik Ł., 2003. Wpływ metody uprawy na plonowanie selera naciowego w warunkach klimatycznych Olsztyna. Folia Hort., Sup. 2003(2), 321–324
Nawrocki J., Mazur S., Kucmierz J., 2003. Influence of different cultivation methods on health status of parsley (Petroselinum sativum Hoffm.) roots. Sodinink. Darzinink. 22(3), 407–412.
Polak M., Ponican J., Jech J., Angelovic M., 1999. Comparison of cultivating root vegetables in soil prepared by the classical method and in ridges. Zemedel. Tech. 45(1), 1–8
Rasmussen E., 1980. Effect of different growing methods in tulips on the yield of saleable bulbs. Acta. Hort. 109, 43–48.
Rasmussen E., 1982. Effect of growing methods, with different spacing and two nitrogen levels, on the yield of salable tulip bulbs. Tidsskr. Plant. 86, 1, 23–30. 4 ref.
Sady W., Cebulak T., 2000. Effect of cultivation methods on nutritive compounds in the carrot. Folia Hort. 12(1), 77–84.
Wierzbicka B., Pierzynowska-Korniak G., Majkowska-Gadomska J., 2004. Wpływ metody uprawy i przechowywania na plon i jędrność korzeni spichrzowych dwóch odmian marchwi. Folia Univ. Agric. Stein. Agric. 239(95), 415–418.
Wróblewska W., 2009. The directions of flower bulbs supply and distribution in Poland in the years 1990 and 2004, EJPAU 12(2), 6, www.ejpau.media.pl
Zhou G.N., 1998. Effect of deep planting on the growth of tulip. Zhejiang Nongye Kexue. 2, 92–93.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.