Attitudes of life sciences students towards farm animal welfare issues
MONIKA BUDZYŃSKA
Department of Ethology and Technological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 LublinWANDA KRUPA
Department of Ethology and Technological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 LublinAbstract
The aim of this study was to examine the knowledge and opinions about farm animal welfare (FAW) aspects amongst 199 students of various faculties (Animal Husbandry, Biology, Environmental Protection, Science of Commodities) at the University of Life Sciences in southeastern Poland. The study was conducted during a face-to-face interview using a self-designed questionnaire consisting of 11 questions. The great majority of respondents, regardless of the degree programme, marked the appropriate definition of animal welfare, confirming that a high level of FAW provides better quality of animals’ life. The survey showed inconsistency of students’ attitudes towards some species, which can be related to various levels and range of animal welfare education in the curricula of particular faculties. Animal Husbandry and Science of Commodities students evaluated horses (p = 0.0005) and dairy cattle (p = 0.04) welfare significantly higher than other student groups and it is probably due to their more specific knowledge about the production/use of particular farm species. This response suggests that life sciences students reflect a relatively high degree of knowledge concerning animal welfare issues. However, there are some areas where FAW education should be improved regarding behaviour and welfare issues of particular groups of farm animals. Moreover, the survey on students’ attitudes can be helpful for adequate development of education contents in the programmes of particular faculties.
Keywords:
animal welfare, attitudes, education, farm animals, studentsReferences
Bousfield B., Brown R., 2010. Animal welfare. Veterinary Bulletin – Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Newsletter 1 (4), 1–11.
Broom D.M., 1991. Animal welfare: concepts and measurements. J. Anim. Sci. 69 (10), 4167–4175.
Coleman G., Hemsworth P., Hay M., 1998. Predicting stockperson behaviour towards pigs from attitudinal and job-related variables and empathy. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 58 (1), 63–75.
Duncan I.J.H., Fraser D., 1997. Understanding animal welfare. In: M.A. Appleby, B.O. Hughes (eds.). Animal welfare. CABI Publ., Wallingford, 19–31.
European Commission, 2005a. Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals. [Online] Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/euro_barometer25_en.pdf [accessed 10 October 2013].
European Commission, 2005b. Summary of response statistics for public internet consultation on the protection and welfare of farmed animals. [Online] Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/sum_response_stats_en.pdf [accessed 10 October 2013].
Heleski C.R., Mertig A.G., Zanella A.J., 2004. Assessing attitudes toward animal welfare:
A national survey of animal science faculty members. J. Anim. Sci. 82 (9), 2806–2814.
Hemsworth P., Coleman G., Barnett J., 1994. Improving the attitude and behaviour of stockpersons towards pigs and the consequences on the behaviour and reproductive performance of commercial pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 39 (3), 349–362.
Hewson C.J., 2003. What is animal welfare? Common definitions and their practical consequences. Can. Vet. J. 44 (6), 496–499.
Levine E.D., Mills D.S., Houpt K.A., 2005. Attitudes of veterinary students at one US College toward factors relating to farm animal welfare. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 32 (4), 481–490.
Malak-Rawlikowska A., Gębska M., 2010. Postrzeganie dobrostanu zwierząt przez uczestników łańcucha żywnościowego w wybranych krajach Unii Europejskiej i w Polsce: Chain attitudes towards animal welfare problems in chosen EU member states and in Poland. Rocz. Nauk Rol. Series G 97 (4), 135–148.
Martelli G., 2009. Consumers’ perception of farm animal welfare: an Italian and European perspective. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 8 (Suppl. 1), 31–41.
Philips C.J.C., Izmirli S., Aldavood S.J., Alonso M., Choe B.I., Hanlon A., Handziska A., Illmann G., Keeling L., Kennedy M., Lee G.H., Lund V., Mejdell C., Pelagic V.R., Rehn T., 2012. Students’ attitudes to animal welfare and rights in Europe and Asia. Anim. Welf. 21 (1), 87–100.
Sitkowska B., Piwczyński D., Kowaliszyn B., Mrowiński M., 2012. Opinions expressed by cattle breeders on human-animal relations and the conditions in which animals are kept. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 13 (1), 177–187.
Veljković S., Stojanović Ž., Filipović J., 2015. Attitudes toward farm animals welfare and consumer’s buying intentions – case of Serbia. Econ. Agric. 62 (1), 53–71.
Department of Ethology and Technological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin
Department of Ethology and Technological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin
License
From 2022 articles are made available under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0). Articles published before 2022 are available under Creative Commons Attribution – Non-commercial use – No derivative works 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Submission of the paper implies that it has not been published previously, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
