The effect of herbicides on biomass weeds, grain yield and some yielding elements of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)
CEZARY A. KWIATKOWSKI
Katedra Herbologii i Technik Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul. Akademicka 13, 20-950 LublinALENA YAKIMOVICH
Instytut Ochrony Roślin w Priłukach, Dystrykt Mińsk, ul. Mira 2, 223011 BiałoruśELŻBIETA HARASIM
Katedra Herbologii i Technik Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul. Akademicka 13, 20-950 LublinMAŁGORZATA HALINIARZ
Katedra Herbologii i Technik Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul. Akademicka 13, 20-950 LublinAbstract
This paper shows results of studies conducted at the same time in Belarus and in Poland (over the period of 2014–2016) on the tolerance of millet towards some foliar herbicides
(2,4-D + fluroxypyr; tribenuron-methyl + fluroxypyr; dicamba + triasulfuron) applied at rates reduced by 1/3 relative to the recommended rates for oats crops. Plots without herbicide application (mechanical weed control) were the control treatment. The experiment was set up with the same design (one-factional) under the soil and climatic conditions of central-eastern Belarus (Priluki near Minsk) and the central Lublin region (Czesławice, Poland), respectively. The Belarussian soil was characterized by medium nutrient availability (soil class III), whereas the soil in Poland had higher nutrient availability (soil class II). In both places, the same agricultural practices were used (tillage system, previous crop, seeding rate, and row spacing), while mineral NPK fertilization was adjusted to the initial soil nutrient availability in both study areas. It was proved that the foliar herbicides applied in the experiment (at the tillering stage of millet) had high weed control efficacy and that the low level of weed infestation contributed to the high productivity of millet compared to the mechanical weed control treatment (without herbicides). The action of the herbicides 2,4-D + fluroxypyr and tribenuron-methyl + fluroxypyr was evaluated particularly positively, since they did not induce a phytotoxic response in millet plants, but eliminated weeds biomass from the crop almost completely. In turn, the herbicide dicamba + triasulfuron exhibited a slightly lower weed-killing ability and, moreover, caused damage to millet plants in a small percentage. Some differences (though statistically insignificant) in weeds biomass and millet yield which were found between the experiments in Belarus and Poland should be attributed to the difference in the soils and more favorable weather conditions for the growth of millet in Belarus.
Keywords:
millet, herbicides, weeds biomass, grain yieldReferences
Anderson R.L., 1988. Kochia infestation levels in proso millet as affected by planting date. West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Rep. (USA),Newark, CA, 292–293.
Anderson R.L., 2000. A cultural system approach can eliminate herbicide need in semiarid proso millet (Panicum miliaceum). Weed Technol. 14, 602–607.
Bac S., Koźmiński C., Rojek M., 1993. Agrometeorologia. PWN, Warszawa, 32–33.
Gardani G., Cerrone R., Biella C., Galbiati B., Proserpio E., Casiraghi M., Travisi O., Meregalli M., Trabattoni P., Colombo L., Giani L., Messina G., Arnoffi J., Lissoni P., 2007. A case-control study of Panicum Miliaceum in the treatment of cancer chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Minerva Medica 98, 661–664.
Grabouski P.H., 1971. Selective control of weeds in proso millet with herbicides. Weed Sci. 19, 207–209.
GUS, 2014. Rocznik Statystyczny Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. Użytkowanie gruntów, powierzchnia zasiewów i pogłowie zwierząt gospodarskich w 2013 roku. Warszawa.
GUS, 2015. Rocznik Statystyczny Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. Użytkowanie gruntów, powierzchnia zasiewów i pogłowie zwierząt gospodarskich w 2014 roku. Warszawa.
IOR, 2016. Zalecenia ochrony roślin na lata 2016/17. Cz. II. Rośliny rolnicze. IOR – PIB, Poznań 2016.
Hanna W.W., Baltensperger D.D., Seetharam A., 2004. Pearl millet and other millets. In: L.E. Moser et al., Warm-Season (C4) Grasses. Agronomy Monographs 45. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, 537–560.
Higgins R.K., Lyon D.J., Miller S.D., 1998. Chemical weed control in proso millet. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 5, 15–16.
Kudsk P., 1999. Optimising herbicide use – the driving force behind the development of the Danish decision support system. The BCPC Conference – Weeds 3, 737–746.
Lyon D.J., Baltensperger D.D., 1993. Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) tolerance to several postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 7, 230–233.
Lyon D.J., Burgener P.A., DeBoer K.L. et al., 2008. Producing and marketing proso millet in the Great Plains. University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension Circular 137. Available at http://www.ianrpubs.unl.edu/epublic/live/ec137/build/ec137.pdf. Accessed: December 31, 2009.
Lyon D.J., Kniss A.R., 2010. Proso millet tolerance to saflufenacil. Weed Technol. 24, 349–355.
Lyon D.J., Kniss A., Miller S.D., 2007. Carfentrazone improves broadleaf weed control in proso and foxtail millets. Weed Technol. 21, 84–87.
Lyon D.J., Miller S.D., 1999. Herbicide injury in proso and foxtail millets. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 52, 24.
Petersen J., Augustin B., 2006. Weed control in millet corn (Panicum miliaceum). J. Plant Dis. Prot., Special Issue 20, 773–779.
Pudełko J., Małecka I., Pitalnik J., 1996. Możliwości zwalczania chwastów w uprawie prosa perłowego (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. BR.). Prog. Plant Prot./ Post. Ochr. Rośl. 36(2), 311–313.
Seefeldt S.S., Jensen J.E., Feurst E.P., 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol. 9, 218–227.
Shahidi F., Chandrasekara A., 2013. Millet grain phenolics and their role in disease risk reduction and health promotion. A review. J. Funct. Foods 5(2), 570–581.
Stahlman P.W., Geier P.W., Charvat L.D., 2009. Tolerance of three millet types to saflufenacil. Proc. North Centr. Weed Sci. Soc. 64, 127.
Tomilina E.A., Soroka S.W., 2002. Влияние гербицидов на засоренность и урожайность проса посевного. Интегрир. системы защиты растений. Настоящее и будущее: материалы Междунар. науч. конф., Минск – Прилуки, 15–17 июля 2002 г. Минск, 2002, 72–74.
Wrage J.L., 2000. Weed control in small grain and millet. South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, 19–20.
Yakimovich А., 2004. Фитотоксичность гербицидов рейсер и кугар в посевах проса. Защита растений: сб. науч. тр. РУП «Институт защиты растений» НАН Беларуси. Минск, РУП «ИВЦ Минфина» 29, 68–72.
Yakimovich A., 2010. Biologitcheskoie owosnowanie chimitcheskoi zastchiti posiewow prosa ot sornych rastienij. Dissiertacija. Institiut Zastchiti Rastienij. NAN Belarus. UDK 633.171:632.934:632.51, 124 pp.
Yakimovich A., Soroka S.W., 2004. Эффективность линтура в посевах проса в зависимости от срока внесения. Земляробства і ахова раслiн 3, 18–19.
Zarnkow M., Faltermaier A., Back W., Gastl M., Arendt E.K., 2010. Evaluation of different yeast strains on the quality of beer produced from malted proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Eur. Food Res. Technol. 231, 287–295.
Katedra Herbologii i Technik Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul. Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin
Instytut Ochrony Roślin w Priłukach, Dystrykt Mińsk, ul. Mira 2, 223011 Białoruś
Katedra Herbologii i Technik Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul. Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin
Katedra Herbologii i Technik Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie, ul. Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin
License
Articles are made available under the conditions CC BY 4.0 (until 2020 under the conditions CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Submission of the paper implies that it has not been published previously, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
The author signs a statement of the originality of the work, the contribution of individuals, and source of funding.
Self-Archiving Policy
Agronomy Science has adopted a self-archiving policy called blue by the Sherpa Romeo database. From 2021 authors can self-archive article postprints and editorial versions (under the CC BY 4.0 licence). Articles from earlier years (available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence) can only be self-archived as editorial versions.
